The Trump Presidency: Sweet/Sweat 16

Status
Not open for further replies.
In a sane and rational world, he would have been laughed out of the primaries after Iowa.
But did the GOP realize Trump would be the only candidate with any chance? Rigged or not.
Would he really have been the only candidate that "had a chance" in 2016 against Hillary?

Yes, Trump won, but he ended up getting less votes than Romney. (His victory probably had as much to do with Clinton's unpopularity, and general Democratic miscalculations than anything else, something that would have been of help to any potential Republican nominee.)

Granted, some of the alternative candidates (like Ted "Machine Gun Bacon" Cruz) didn't exactly have much charisma, but there were others (such as Kasich) who might have had a good shot at winning.
 
Trump Tweets

NORTH CAROLINA, VOTE FOR DAN BISHOP TODAY. WE NEED HIM BADLY IN WASHINGTON!
 
Trump Tweets

ABC/Washington Post Poll was the worst and most inaccurate poll of any taken prior to the 2016 Election. When my lawyers protested, they took a 12 point down and brought it to almost even by Election Day. It was a Fake Poll by two very bad and dangerous media outlets. Sad!

One of the greatest and most powerful weapons used by the Fake and Corrupt News Media is the phony Polling Information they put out. Many of these polls are fixed, or worked in such a way that a certain candidate will look good or bad. Internal polling looks great, the best ever!
 
Trump Tweets

ABC/Washington Post Poll was the worst and most inaccurate poll of any taken prior to the 2016 Election. When my lawyers protested, they took a 12 point down and brought it to almost even by Election Day. It was a Fake Poll by two very bad and dangerous media outlets. Sad!

One of the greatest and most powerful weapons used by the Fake and Corrupt News Media is the phony Polling Information they put out. Many of these polls are fixed, or worked in such a way that a certain candidate will look good or bad. Internal polling looks great, the best ever!

I take it that President Trump has fared badly in a recent Washington Post Poll.

Regarding the highlighted, is President Trump suggesting that the Washington Post changed its polling results over time in response to his lawyers (as opposed to it changing in response to changes in polling numbers). ?
 
Trump Tweets

I informed John Bolton last night that his services are no longer needed at the White House. I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration, and therefore....

....I asked John for his resignation, which was given to me this morning. I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week.
 
I'm being perfectly serious. We've got almost two years of more gerrymandering, more voter suppression plans being put in place, maybe another SCOTUS judge or two.
I agree that the Republicans have certainly taken steps to entrench themselves in power... Yes, Gerrymandering will help them win house seats, and suppression will help them win senate seats (and gives them a certain advantage when dealing with the presidency.)

I think the reason people might be skeptical about the Republicans getting enough support to change the constitution is that its such a high bar... not only do they have to win the senate and house (both possible) but they need Super majorities in both the House and Senate (Given the polarization in American politics, its hard to see either party getting more than 60% of the seats), and support from 38 states (Only 27 states have Republican governors... so they'd have to win around a dozen more states.)
Again I'm not getting what magical factor people think is going to make 2020 a harder battle for the GOP then 2016.
There are a couple of things working against the GOP this time around:

- There are more republican senate seats up for grabs. (The problem the democrats had in 2018 is that they had to defend more of their seats than the Republicans)

- Gerrymandering and voter suppression are issues, but many of the states where it was a problem had already been a problem in 2016/2018. (In other words, its bad, but not getting significantly worse)

- Florida (often a key swing state) had a referendum that granted former felons the right to vote. Since people convicted of crimes tend to be in the same demographics as Democratic supporters (namely poor and/or minorities), it could benefit the Democrats in that state. Now, admittedly the republicans are trying to take steps to curb their rights (requiring ex felons to pay certain fines to get their voting rights restored), but given the often razor-thin margins in Florida elections, even a small number of ex-felons voting could make a big difference.

- More Republican congress critters are retiring than Democrats. Being an incumbent does provide an advantage (for example in name recognition), so having more 'fresh' Republicans standing for election gives the Democrats an advantage.

Then of course you have the general unpopularity of Trump, which hopefully carries through to Election day.

Again, I'm not saying that gerrymandering and voter suppression are not problems, just that there are some advantages that the Democrats have this time that they did not have last time.
 
I agree that the Republicans have certainly taken steps to entrench themselves in power... Yes, Gerrymandering will help them win house seats, and suppression will help them win senate seats (and gives them a certain advantage when dealing with the presidency.)

I think the reason people might be skeptical about the Republicans getting enough support to change the constitution is that its such a high bar... not only do they have to win the senate and house (both possible) but they need Super majorities in both the House and Senate (Given the polarization in American politics, its hard to see either party getting more than 60% of the seats), and support from 38 states (Only 27 states have Republican governors... so they'd have to win around a dozen more states.)

Why does what the constitution says suddenly matter? It says a lot about emoluments but that doesn't mean anything.
 
Florida (often a key swing state) had a referendum that granted former felons the right to vote. Since people convicted of crimes tend to be in the same demographics as Democratic supporters (namely poor and/or minorities), it could benefit the Democrats in that state. Now, admittedly the republicans are trying to take steps to curb their rights (requiring ex felons to pay certain fines to get their voting rights restored), but given the often razor-thin margins in Florida elections, even a small number of ex-felons voting could make a big difference.

I'm aware. I live in Florida. I voted for that referendum.

The Republicans have already undid it. That "You have to pay all your fines" thing isn't some minor side detail, it's a total gutting of the referendum to the point that is functionally been revoked.
 
Trump Tweets

I informed John Bolton last night that his services are no longer needed at the White House. I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration, and therefore....

....I asked John for his resignation, which was given to me this morning. I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week.

Interesting. I wonder what Bolton did? Point out that giving the Saudis nuclear technology is a bad idea?
 
Honestly? Probably nothing specific. Trump just realized he hasn't fired anyone in a while.

It's been less than a week! He fired his longtime PA because she got sloshed and told a bunch of people he couldn't pick his daughter Tiffany out of a line-up.
 
Bolton is texting Fox hosts who are on air to dispute trump's version of things.

Kilmeade: "John Bolton just texted me, just now, he's watching. He said, 'let's be clear, I resigned.'"
 
Trump Tweets

I informed John Bolton last night that his services are no longer needed at the White House. I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration, and therefore....

....I asked John for his resignation, which was given to me this morning. I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week.

Bolton is texting Fox hosts who are on air to dispute trump's version of things.
Kilmeade: "John Bolton just texted me, just now, he's watching. He said, 'let's be clear, I resigned.'"

He resigned after being asked to. Maybe. If you believe Trump.
In any case, good riddance to bad rubbish. He must have been VERY disappointed with Trump not bombing the crap out of Iran. And NK, as well.
 
Trump was forced to see Bolton's freaking weird mustache one too many times.

It always puts me in mind of the famous photo of Nietzsche with a similar bedraggled mustache. Nietzsche's was due to his being completely demented and incapable of grooming himself by then, no idea what Bolton's excuse is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom