• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged I killed Duality and Uncertainty for a Theory of Everything

pittsburghjoe said:
yeah, it's ahhh, common sense? I said current quantum experiments support my claims.
Click to expand...

Would you then agree that if the shape of the pattern on the back plane when there is a detector showing which slit the particle passes through is due to the wave properties of the electron then your theory must be wrong?
 
Without the detector that tells you which slit the particle you sum the waves as interfering with each other, with that detector you do a simple sum of the waves. Waves in either case.
 
But lets leave aside which one of us has our facts mixed up.

Would you agree that if the shape of the pattern on the back plane when there is a detector showing which slit the particle passes through is due to the wave properties of the electron then your theory must be wrong?

(Edit, was the earlier "Yes" to this question?)
 
Last edited:
pittsburghjoe said:
Observed particles travel like little bullets
Click to expand...
Still wrong, pittsburghjoe.
Macroscopic particles travel like little bullets because they are literally bullets
The physical evidence is that quantum particles travel like waves and like particles: Wave/particle duality
Observed particles such as electrons, neutrons, protons, C60 fullerenes, tetraphenylporphyrin (a large molecule) passing through a double slit behave as waves.

6 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: What does your theory predict for the single electron double slit experiment?
6 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Quote the single electron double slit experiment part of your original OP.
6 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Where in your theory are quaternions used (citation or quotation needed) [or say you wasted our time with an irrelevant video]?
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats ignorance and/or fantasies about the delayed choice quantum eraser.
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Quantum observation non-science - an observation at any place is an observation, e.g. electrons at a screen!
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: An ignorant "entangled particle" statement and a signaling fantasy.
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Partial ignorance about a detector in physics.
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: "polarizers at the slits are detectors" ignorance.
 
Last edited:
pittsburghjoe said:
Observed particles do not travel as waves. Get it through your head that the final panel doesn't count.
Click to expand...
I know that is what you claim.

I say that particles that are observed mid path travel as waves where the final amplitude depends upon an intermediate amplitude.

One of us is wrong, clearly.

But since you are the expert, please give me your mathematical account of the shape of the pattern built up by electrons on the back plane of the experiment where there is a detector to tell us which slit the electron passed through.
 
That wasn't directed at you.
You want a mathematical account of a bullet traveling. There isn't a model necessary for this.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
That wasn't directed at you.
You want a mathematical account of a bullet traveling. There isn't a model necessary for this.
Click to expand...
Even if it were just a bullet travelling it would need a model.

But I asked for a mathematical account of the shape of the pattern that builds up on the back plane in the double slit experiment where there is a detector that allows us to know which slit the electron passes through.
 
Persists with ignorance about the double silt experiment and a "final panel" fantasy

pittsburghjoe said:
Observed particles do not travel as waves. Get it through your head that the final panel doesn't count.
Click to expand...
Usual ignorance not directed at anyone. You need to use the quote function.

9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Persists with ignorance about the double silt experiment and a "final panel" fantasy.
Observed particles such as electrons, neutrons, protons, C60 fullerenes, tetraphenylporphyrin (a large molecule) passing through a double slit behave as waves.
 
Last edited:
pittsburghjoe said:
the trajectory of particles from the gun are randomized on purpose.
Click to expand...
Can you answer my question or can't you?

If not, can you describe one of the ways that a mainstream physicist would describe that pattern mathematically?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom