• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jeffrey Epstein arrested for child sex trafficking

Checkmite said:
If this was Opposite-World, maybe.

You can't seriously think they believe they'd be held "more responsible" if an inmate flipped out and killed Epstein between checks than they would be for actual prison staff actually sleeping on duty, not checking on Epstein all night, AND fudging logs to try and cover their butts afterwards on top of it. You can't. I refuse to believe it.
Click to expand...

I'm saying they might have felt like they'd be held more responsible if there was a murder AND actual prison staff actually sleeping on duty, not checking on Epstein all night, AND fudging logs to try and cover their butts afterwards on top of it.
 
Epstein used his wealth to get his way.
I wouldn't be surprised if he had paid someone to kill him quicker and less painful than he could on his own.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
Epstein used his wealth to get his way.
I wouldn't be surprised if he had paid someone to kill him quicker and less painful than he could on his own.
Click to expand...

The "partial hanging" method he supposedly used is supposed to be completely painless.
It doesn't break multiple neck bones, tho. Anything that would break bones would probably hurt.
 
kellyb said:
The "celebrity pathologists" was present for Epstein's autopsy and was the coroner for years. He had the exact same job in the exact same city as the one who decided to call it suicide.

Going on Fox doesn't somehow make him a non-expert, does it?
Click to expand...

It makes him a publicity hound - someone who doesn't get paid for giving headline material, not for being professional.
 
kellyb said:
I'm saying they might have felt like they'd be held more responsible if there was a murder AND actual prison staff actually sleeping on duty, not checking on Epstein all night, AND fudging logs to try and cover their butts afterwards on top of it.
Click to expand...

And you think that, considering the guards are evidently going down either way, the prison is going to give the murderer-inmate a free pass and even cover up his crime for him, hanging the whole thing on the prison staff alone, out of the kindness of their magnanimous hearts?
 
kellyb said:
The "partial hanging" method he supposedly used is supposed to be completely painless.
It doesn't break multiple neck bones, tho. Anything that would break bones would probably hurt.
Click to expand...


... if he was still conscious when they broke.
 
Maybe Epstein doesn't deserve any better, but I think it all of this baseless speculation and Dr. Google, Pathology Expert belongs in CT. I apologize for contributing yesterday.
 
Lawyers of the women fighting for Epstein's stuff.

I didn't know they could do that.

More power to them if they succeed.
 
Venom said:
Lawyers of the women fighting for Epstein's stuff.

I didn't know they could do that.

More power to them if they succeed.
Click to expand...

Yeah, his last will and testament may be as important as his last meal. Between litigation costs and civil payouts, his estate is likely to be zeroed out.
 
angrysoba said:
Now, we just need to know who the beneficiary is and that’s your smoking gun: “queue bonobos”!
Click to expand...

Evidently he put the whole kit and kaboodle into a single trust. No individual beneficiaries named. Although it's possible the trust has instructions along those lines; the point of trusts often is to obscure and anonymize exactly such details.
 
Pizzagate is real. It just does not involve pizza, and it is a bipartisan effort.

Are we going to keep letting the ruling class getting away with this ******

Are we going to keep licking their boots?

I suspect most of you will. Because the system is just so dang good. You love it, folks.
 
Lambchops said:
Pizzagate is real. It just does not involve pizza, and it is a bipartisan effort.

Are we going to keep letting the ruling class getting away with this ******

Are we going to keep licking their boots?

I suspect most of you will. Because the system is just so dang good. You love it, folks.
Click to expand...

Nope. It's not real.
 
Far out

I have been pretty open since day one of my issues with literacy, but I think Prince Andy just stole my crown, for a tad dyssy

Did anyone actually check this before posting it?

"I have said previously that it was a mistake and an error to see him after his release in 2010 and I can only reiterate my regret that I was mistaken to think that what I thought I knew of him was evidently not the real person, given what we now know.
Click to expand...

What does that even mean?


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49460263
 
"I have said previously that it was a mistake and an error to see him after his release in 2010 and I can only reiterate my regret that I was mistaken to think that what I thought I knew of him was evidently not the real person, given what we now know.
Click to expand...

I hate this sort of shifting blame.

I made a mistake the other day when I trusted Google maps to tell me which roads were closed with the damage to Todbrook Reservoir dam. This was something that had (mildly) bad consequences for me.

Deciding to go to what seem like orgies hosted by a previously convicted sexual predator* at the least shows a complete lack of moral compass.

I guess he does indeed think it was a mistake, due to the negative PR consequences.

I guess it would be too much to ask for him to say that he's realised that his complete lack of moral compass has further damaged his image, so he'll outsource the role of conscience to an adviser.

*That he only met after the conviction. (Thanks Darat)
 
Last edited:
jimbob said:
I hate this sort of shifting blame.

I made a mistake the other day when I trusted Google maps to tell me which roads were closed with the damage to Todbrook Reservoir dam. This was something that had (mildly) bad consequences for me.

Deciding to go to what seem like orgies hosted by a convicted sexual predator at the least shows a complete lack of moral compass.

I guess he does indeed think it was a mistake, due to the negative PR consequences.

I guess it would be too much to ask for him to say that he's realised that his complete lack of moral compass has further damaged his image, so he'll outsource the role of conscience to an adviser.
Click to expand...

It's actually worse than it first seems. He met Epstein after Epstein was released after being convicted. Whether he had seen anything or not he knew Epstein was a convicted sex offender at that point so before he decided to meet him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom