Ah right, so offering refuge or any kind of assistance to fleeing Syrians is backing Assad. Makes sense!
What is your problem?
---
Anyway, yes. Refugees deserve better than being a guest in someone else's country. They deserve to be citizens in their homeland. We should be thinking about how we can help to make that happen.
Accepting refugees with no plan for their return and reclamation of their homeland really does concede territory to the tyrants and terrorists who drove them out.
I'm not saying refugees should be turned away at the border, and told to go back and solve their own problems. I'm saying they should be welcomed temporarily, and be required to participate in the planning and implementation of their return home.
Not wanting to live under Assad is understandable. Not being able to fight back is also understandable. But Western Europe (for example) certainly has the wherewithal to overturn the Assad regime, and drive out ISIS, if they wish. I think that it would probably be a better use of their resources, long term, to offer that support to Syrian refugees, and condition asylum on that basis. You come, you rest, you train, and you go back and fight for what's yours. There's no need to let Assad drive away the opposition and keep Syria for himself.
---
Or look at it another way: All these Syrian refugees, where should we put them? Why not Syria? Well, Syria isn't a great place right now. So let's fix that, then.