Status
Not open for further replies.
I utterly despise the posturing, the hypocrisy, the lying and the underlying venality that really motivates "liberalism", whether it's in privileged middle-class poseurs or entitled, stupid ne're-do-wells who think the world owes them a living.


Nah, bro, you're just gullible enough to believe every single straw man about liberals you've ever been exposed to.

Sad!
 
Has it ever occurred to you wonder what people mean by "wearing out" a word? What will you and your like do when you finally wear out 'racist'?

Did the above statement make sense to you in your head when you were composing it? What do you mean by wearing a term out...the term will be valid as long as racists exist.
 
Trump Tweets

“Yesterday changed everything, it really did clear the President. He wins.” @ainsleyearhardt “It changed everything in favor of the President, who said all along this investigation is rooted in nothing. Mueller was exposed as being best friends with Comey. Today, you say.....


...impeachment, you have a Party of one. It’s over.” @kilmeade “Nancy said, Jerry, please sit down. Very bad idea. We discovered that after putting so much time & energy into the Mueller Report, it turns out Mueller didn’t know what was in his Report.” @SteveDoocy @foxandfriends
 
Do you actually, seriously not see yourself as "partisan"?

You do realise that he's not an American, right?

Just because you're one thing doesn't mean everybody else is. "Atheism is a religion!", "the official story is a conspicary theory!", etc. Saying that smacks of the realisation that what you're doing is wrong.
 
LoL. Opinions?

Yes, when a judge or jury make a verdict, it is their opinion. When scientists draw a conclusion from years of research, it's their opinion. When investigators complete a report, it's their opinion. Their professional opinion.

You mean the "opinions" fed to corporate media performers like Rachel Maddow and disseminated to a gullible public, the ones citing "unnamed" "Russian officials"? The "opnions" compiled and added to in a certain "report" by an ex-MI6 weasel trading on his old-boy network connections? Those "opinions"?

How about you answer my question? Other than giving the conclusion that doesn't suit you, what's your basis for disagreeing with them?
 
I utterly despise the posturing, the hypocrisy, the lying and the underlying venality that really motivates "liberalism", whether it's in privileged middle-class poseurs or entitled, stupid ne're-do-wells who think the world owes them a living.

I'm sure you think people who believe differently from you cannot sincerely hold these beliefs.

That's the problem with ideologues.
 
But I am most definitely partisan, no bones, in so far that I'm as anti-liberal, anti-socialist, anti-SJW as it's possible for anyone to be.

I wonder about people who say things like that. Do you use public roads? Enjoy the protection of your local police, fire department, or the national military? Did you go to public school?
 
I wonder about people who say things like that. Do you use public roads? Enjoy the protection of your local police, fire department, or the national military? Did you go to public school?

Begrudgingly, I'm sure. He's just waiting for the glorious day when all of this becomes for-profit and he can enjoy paying tolls and fees at every intersection because the next bit of road is owned by a different corporation, and he hasn't renewed his subscription.
 
Mueller was exposed as being "best friends" with Comey, was he? Someone he described as a "colleague" and stated that he went 6 months without having any communication whatsoever with him?

In the meantime, Trump openly said that he wanted to become "best friends" with Vladimir Putin, and that he "fell in love" with Kim Jong Un.
 
LoL. Opinions? You mean the "opinions" fed to corporate media performers like Rachel Maddow and disseminated to a gullible public, the ones citing "unnamed" "Russian officials"? The "opnions" compiled and added to in a certain "report" by an ex-MI6 weasel trading on his old-boy network connections? Those "opinions"?

Serious question: Do we have any conservative posters left here who don’t peddle conspiracy theories?
 
Mueller was exposed as being "best friends" with Comey, was he? Someone he described as a "colleague" and stated that he went 6 months without having any communication whatsoever with him?

I believe that was one of the attempts at a "gotcha". He so wanted Mueller to say "yes". The same thing with the "did you interview for the Director" position, that was shot down several times.

In the meantime, Trump openly said that he wanted to become "best friends" with Vladimir Putin, and that he "fell in love" with Kim Jong Un.

I have heard Kim Jong Un is dreamy, and I challenge you to find a man that looks better shirtless on the back of a horse than Vladdy
 
Really? Truly? Sincerely?

Somebody sez:

"I utterly despise the posturing, the hypocrisy, the lying and the underlying venality that really motivates "liberalism", whether it's in privileged middle-class poseurs or entitled, stupid ne're-do-wells who think the world owes them a living."


Wow! I've never felt so EVIL in my entire utter life! And it turns out that the world (the whole world!) owes me a living! With broads 'n booze 'n a welfare Cadillac! And I get to lie, and to hypocritise (I made that word up; hey, I'm entitled) and be venal on the furniture and all that good stuff!

Oh man, this is the life!
 
But I am most definitely partisan, no bones, in so far that I'm as anti-liberal, anti-socialist, anti-SJW as it's possible for anyone to be.
Why should anyone – especially in a forum dedicated to critical thinking – pay any attention to someone who would declare the highlighted?

as it's possible for anyone to be

Kim? Stalin? Nero? Mao? It's possible to be pretty darned anti-social justice. You're claiming to be more anti-social justice then anyone is now or ever has been.

That is as weird a flex as it is crystal clear indication of uncritical thought.
 
Why should anyone – especially in a forum dedicated to critical thinking – pay any attention to someone who would declare the highlighted?

as it's possible for anyone to be

Kim? Stalin? Nero? Mao? It's possible to be pretty darned anti-social justice. You're claiming to be more anti-social justice then anyone is now or ever has been.

That is as weird a flex as it is crystal clear indication of uncritical thought.

I saw a meme recently that thanked Trumpers for wearing the red hats as it makes them easily identifiable.

I have to agree in this case, and when it comes to people like IsThisTheLife, it's a breath of fresh air when they show you who they are. He advertised that it makes absolutely no difference if you give him any quality information. He isn't a skeptic, he isn't interested in intelligent conversation, he's interested in being partisan.

I dig that. It's nice to not have to waste any time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom