Mueller Investigation pt 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
smartcooky said:
Those of us who were actually paying attention were already pretty sure that Assange/Wikileaks were in cahoots with the Russians.
Click to expand...
I think it's worth repeating that the Assange-Putin connection was widely accepted, for very good reasons, long before Trump became anything more than a US TV celebrity.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Try to comprehend the texts you read.
Click to expand...

Try to comprehend that your hostility does not belong in this discussion so please do kindly shove it...

The source of the claim that Mueller requested the postponing is given as "House democrats". A factual claim. The claim you claim I omitted is an opinion. It just "also appeared" to Democrats if we read the sentence benevolently. If not, it's just the opinion of the author of the text. Value in both cases: zero.
Click to expand...

So basically the source is: people with actual knowledge of what's going on

The hearing is being expanded. The hearing was then delayed.

I find that far more credible than your insane web of random information with little squiggly lines drawn everywhere. I give that a value of: less than zero.
 
Last edited:
Segnosaur said:
Just witness ChildhoodEmpress... tries attacking the CNN article, and does so by referring to some "journalist" that probably nobody here has heard of, who has her work published in such high quality locations as GlobalResearch.ca, and seems to have written a book on astrology. Yet to her that is somehow this person is somehow someone who's opinion actually matters.
Click to expand...


I did not "try to attack" the CNN article, I skimmed it for a minute and gave you what you need to know. In addition to it I linked Caitlin's article (because it just showed up in my newsreader which I checked after sending my post), which gives several tons of links you could inquire without ad hom-ing her.

And it is far from the first time I linked to her articles (she is just so superior to the pseudo-skeptical mindset that watching the reactions is always amusing), it is also far from the first time that ad homs followed. And believe it or not, you weren't the first to point to the astrology book she once wrote. Or the second. Or the third. One time I answered that by linking the article she herself wrote on that, and that was enough. You can search my posts if you like.

Reading your reply I just thought "I could program that bot in half an hour".

Try to be more original next timet.
 
Delphic Oracle said:
Try to comprehend that your hostility does not belong in this discussion so please do kindly shove it...
Click to expand...


You wasted my time with something you could have found yourself in a minute (the court order) and then continued to passive-aggressively "I love how you...." bother me. It's you who has to change the tone, buddy. People get back from me what they send out.
 
Childlike Empress said:
You wasted my time with something you could have found yourself in a minute (the court order) and then continued to passive-aggressively "I love how you...." bother me. It's you who has to change the tone, buddy. People get back from me what they send out.
Click to expand...

Actually, that's not true. I asked you a question. What I got back was BS.
 
Cabbage said:
Actually, that's not true. I asked you a question. What I got back was BS something that went way over my head although the quintessence was right in the headline. And it's not that I cared about the answer anyway - as I told you last time I just want to troll hahaha got you again.
Click to expand...


FTFY. I guess this is where our "conversations" end, Cabbage.
 
Segnosaur said:
Never underestimate the ability of Trump supporters and the like to ignore evidence. As I have stated before, you could publish the video of Trump giving oral sex to Putin as he personally accesses the Democratic email servers (and Assange lovingly looks on) and it still wouldn't be enough for some people.

Just witness ChildhoodEmpress... tries attacking the CNN article, and does so by referring to some "journalist" that probably nobody here has heard of, who has her work published in such high quality locations as GlobalResearch.ca, and seems to have written a book on astrology. Yet to her that is somehow this person is somehow someone who's opinion actually matters.
Click to expand...

I see it like this

Debating with Trumpistas is like playing a game of "Jenga" but one with special rules - you are trying to make the tower fall, they are trying to keep it up.

The tower is the whole imaginary Trump construct they believe in
- what a great job Trump does
- no collusion
- no obstruction
- not a racist or a white supremacist
- biggest and best at everything

Your turn is when you provide and/or show them new evidence - that's you pulling a piece out of the tower.

Their turn is to claim that you haven't pulled out any pieces.

But you know, that if you keep pulling those pieces out, the tower is going to fall.
 
Last edited:
With Mueller testifying live and on TV this week, The PDJT is going to have to do something extraordinary to attempt a distraction this time. Start a war, maybe?
 
Trump Tweets

Highly conflicted Robert Mueller should not be given another bite at the apple. In the end it will be bad for him and the phony Democrats in Congress who have done nothing but waste time on this ridiculous Witch Hunt. Result of the Mueller Report, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION!...

....But the questions should be asked, why were all of Clinton’s people given immunity, and why were the text messages of Peter S and his lover, Lisa Page, deleted and destroyed right after they left Mueller, and after we requested them(this is Illegal)?
 
Another bite at the apple? Wouldn't that mean he's starting the investigation over again?

I'm trying to figure out what the "best case scenario" is from testifying in front of these committees. In my heart of hearts I hope they use the information to strengthen our voting processes and equipment. I don't want this to be a petty soundbyte competition.

What I'd like to learn is, in no particular order:

Why have so many investigations been closed since the report was issued?

Does Mueller believe those investigations should have been closed, and what evidence was used to begin the investigations in the first place?

Was there any pressure by Barr to limit the investigation after taking over?

Lastly, I would like the details of the obstruction laid out in layman's terms so that the average individual can understand what happened. Put a rest to that "No Obstruction" nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom