Grizzly Adams
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 1,226
It is not just policy, it is mandated by law.Detaining asylum-seekers pending review of their petition for asylum is a reasonable policy.
It is not just policy, it is mandated by law.Detaining asylum-seekers pending review of their petition for asylum is a reasonable policy.
This is true. It is also true, however, that the law mandates detention for asylum claimants. It is not optional. It is also true that many thousands of claimants have broken the law by crossing illegally into the United States prior to making their asylum claim. That is not a right. It is illegal and they get arrested for it and held in detention (as mandated) pending review of their claim.Seeking asylum within the United States is not a crime. It's a right.
Know that if a group is apprehended by Border Patrol, they crossed illegally. This is a fact.
Those who forget history...
I am ready to completely eliminate the possibility that a group of 100+ migrants wandering the desert who surrender to a BPA and claim asylum is in the country lawfully.You seriously wanna stick with this? Are you ready to completely eliminate the possibility that a border patrol agent might mistakenly apprehend someone who is legally authorized to be within the United States?
You are wrong about crossing illegally, there is no such law that one crossing the border cannot ask for asylum if they did not come through an entry port.This is true. It is also true, however, that the law mandates detention for asylum claimants. It is not optional. It is also true that many thousands of claimants have broken the law by crossing illegally into the United States prior to making their asylum claim. That is not a right. It is illegal and they get arrested for it and held in detention (as mandated) pending review of their claim.
IOW this is unsettled law.While U.S. law provides arriving asylum seekers the right to be in the United States while their claim for protection is pending, the government has argued that it has the right to detain such individuals. Some courts have rejected this interpretation and held that asylum seekers meeting certain criteria have a right to a hearing over their detention if they have been held for at least six months. Several lawsuits have challenged the practice of detaining asylum applicants, including class-action suits that document the prolonged detention—sometimes lasting years—of individuals with credible fear awaiting adjudication of their claim for asylum.
Ok but these so-called concentration camps are not extermination camps. They are in place to protect Americans from the child traffickers, murderers, and other criminals flooding our borders. I can't think of anything else that can be done to protect us.
Well, are you saying that there are no illegals who are child traffickers? Seeing a toddler holding the hand of an unrelated adult is a good bit of evidence that there are indeed child traffickers who are crossing our borders with the intent of selling these kids to perverts.
The US really is the worst country on the planet. You suck so much.
The US is running consentration camps.
Innocent children are suffering in these consentration camps.
US citizens are happily giving their tax dollars to pay for these camps.
Seems like the whole "taxation is theft" thing doesn't really bother you much at all.
Funny how that works. The US really is the worst country on the planet. You suck so much.
The US migration debate is not about migration. It is about reality, and the unwillingness to face it.
Comparing US migration policies to countries like Australia, Japan or the EU ignores both the history of America and the geographic and economic facts.
The US economy can't function without a large pool of migrant labor, and it can't completely stop illegal migration even if it tried with all its might.
I don't think ten over generally rises to the arresting level.
You are wrong about what I have claimed. I have never claimed that a person who crossed illegally cannot petition for asylum, I simply stated that crossing illegally is illegal. Claiming asylum after crossing illegally doesn't retroactively change that crossing into a lawful act.You are wrong about crossing illegally, there is no such law that one crossing the border cannot ask for asylum if they did not come through an entry port.
After a certain point they can request release on bond. But that point is not before they have a credible fear determination and certainly not immediately upon saying "asylum!"If they are required to be detained, how is it they can apply for work visa after 150 days while their case is pending?
That's why I quoted the statute.You are spouting legal opinions Trump has repeated. He's a demonstrably unreliable source.
Which "assertions" are those?Your assertions don't look reliable either.
...Believe that America 2019 is the same as Germany 1936.
Anther lie from a Trump supporter. Do any of you know how to be honest? Seriously. No one has accused Trump of setting in motion a plan to build death camps. That is an important difference that has been pointed out to you and your fellow travelers multiple times. Why do you persist in this lie? Is it because not backing down from a lie is what your dear leader would do?
Make up your minds, please. The first Nazi death camps were instituted around 1941. Concentration camps were in existence in 1936. If you're claiming these are concentration camps, don't fly into a tizzy when someone suggests you are drawing similarities to Germany in 1936.Anther lie from a Trump supporter. Do any of you know how to be honest? Seriously. No one has accused Trump of setting in motion a plan to build death camps. That is an important difference that has been pointed out to you and your fellow travelers multiple times. Why do you persist in this lie? Is it because not backing down from a lie is what your dear leader would do?