Dont get me wrong at the moment I'm more than willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, it was just a musing from what one of them posted.Concussions have been known to cause memory loss.
Dont get me wrong at the moment I'm more than willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, it was just a musing from what one of them posted.Concussions have been known to cause memory loss.
Call me old fashioned and blame my dead mother and father for it, but unless they smashed their own bodies around to cause the blood, dudes don't hit chicks.
Yeah I was brought up that way and understand how those behaviour restraints are programmed into us but it is a load of crap. Everyone should be allowed to defend themselves with an appropriate amount of force regards of the sex of the attacker.Call me old fashioned and blame my dead mother and father for it, but unless they smashed their own bodies around to cause the blood, dudes don't hit chicks.
Yeah I was brought up that way and understand how those behaviour restraints are programmed into us but it is a load of crap. Everyone should be allowed to defend themselves with an appropriate amount of force regards of the sex of the attacker.
I doubt very much that their injuries result from an appropriate amount of self defense even if they were the first to punch.
But I still don't know what it means. Am I supposed to suddenly hate something, or what?
The Mail are fishing for anything they can get about the victims to try to give the story legs. Presumably this story will run at least until the perpetrators are identified and tracked down, so it needs filler until that happens. In the meantime, any salacious gossip or titillating detail they can buy will be spun into another day's story about the victims. They're lesbians: any relationship history the paper can unearth, however mundane, will be spun to sound as titillating as possible.
These women are not just the victims of a violent attack, their lives have now been fed into the tabloid machine and they're going to suffer a couple of weeks of stories that even they will scarcely recognise as referring to themselves.
I was thinking that this was the way for Daily Mail to publish meaningful support for the victims.
Yeah I was brought up that way and understand how those behaviour restraints are programmed into us but it is a load of crap. Everyone should be allowed to defend themselves with an appropriate amount of force regards of the sex of the attacker.
I doubt very much that their injuries result from an appropriate amount of self defense even if they were the first to punch.
The bus company has told reporters that the CCTV footage shows the attack. Due to the nature of CCTV cameras on buses, there is a negligible chance that the footage could somehow show any part of the attack without showing the whole thing, since they are stationary cameras that show the entire passenger area of the bus and are always operating.
Was it on a front page?
What was everyone else on the bus doing, just watching?
There have been 49 murders in London in 2019 so far. There were 119 in 2018. Every one of them on the national front pages ... not.
OK, how about "leading story on the national TV news"?
The basic problem is that London is becoming more and more lawless, provably.
Are we going to have another 8 page thread of London natives refuting No-Go zone claims again?
What was everyone else on the bus doing, just watching?
It was the top deck of a night bus at 02:30 in the morning on a weekday. It's entirely possible that the only ones there were the victims and their assailants, especially given the route and direction of travel.
Tbf While I think we should go with the womens version, this is the bit that sounds extremely odd