Merged Hulsey presents research arguing WTC7 not brought down by fires/University of Alaska

[Trojan]

Also, look for this

http://branches.asce.org/fairbanks/sites/branches.asce.org.fairbanks/files/2016-10-19.pdf

 

[bknight]

PDC is ? Professional XX?

 

[ozeco41]

PDC is ? Professional XX?

"plan design construct" - an Alaskan engineering firm.
https://www.pdceng.com/

 

[bknight]

"plan design construct" - an Alaskan engineering firm.
https://www.pdceng.com/

Ok,thanks.

 

[Josarhus]

Did anything interesting happen in Alaska yesterday?

 

[Whip]

Did anything interesting happen in Alaska yesterday?

a Palin didn't get arrested?

 

[MileHighMadness]

Did anything interesting happen in Alaska yesterday?

The presentation will probably get posted on YouTube, shortly.

 

[SpitfireIX]

I'm waiting for that so I can watch it before I email Bill Schnabel.

 

[Gamolon]

The presentation will probably get posted on YouTube, shortly.

Unfortunately, it will not. I emailed and asked about it and was told that they do not record those luncheons.

 

[Trojan]

I am interested in seeing the sign-in sheet

 

[Oystein]

I hope to get the PowerPoint, after some changes.
Hulsey hopes to have a rough draft report in about a month.

 

[Trojan]

It appears Hulsey has a good audience, for the venue - 32

http://branches.asce.org/fairbanks/...banks/files/2019_05 Hulsey WTC 7 Findings.pdf

 

[bknight]

It appears Hulsey has a good audience, for the venue - 32

http://branches.asce.org/fairbanks/...banks/files/2019_05 Hulsey WTC 7 Findings.pdf

Don't you mean had?

 

[Trojan]

yes, had

 

[DGM]

I do like the totally open nature of this study...........I'm sure the published paper will be available shortly....

 

[Jaytje46]

Still waiting...

I assume, now that this report is finished, they start with WTc 1 and 2

 

[bknight]

Still waiting...

I assume, now that this report is finished, they start with WTc 1 and 2

We all grow old waiting for this piece of work. He should at least start with WTC 1 and the damage it caused, but we'll just have to wait.

 

[DGM]

Should we start the monthly count of the forgotten (like with the dust study)?

 

[Oystein]

Should we start the monthly count of the forgotten (like with the dust study)?

An idea that is pretty much having itself, but I see a problem: Which of the several due dates would you wish to count from? The end of the original 2-year runtime (April 30 2017)? Of the 3-year project that you currently see at the UAF site (April 30 2018)? The "end of 2018" talk that we heard last September?

Most recently, Hulsey told me 54 days ago that he "hope[d] to complete the rough draft in 30 days".

 

[Gamolon]

An idea that is pretty much having itself, but I see a problem: Which of the several due dates would you wish to count from? The end of the original 2-year runtime (April 30 2017)? Of the 3-year project that you currently see at the UAF site (April 30 2018)? The "end of 2018" talk that we heard last September?

Most recently, Hulsey told me 54 days ago that he "hope[d] to complete the rough draft in 30 days".

The UAF website now shows Septmember 30, 2019 as the finish date.
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7