2020 Democratic Candidates Tracker

Status
Not open for further replies.
Delvo said:
In response to something about Biden & Sanders, how could "Hillary II", complete with the distinguisher added after the name, be literally about Hillary? It obviously must be about not her but somebody nicknamed "Hillary II, which is somebody else... like maybe the more Hillaryous one of the two people who were named in the quote that it was responding to...
Click to expand...

Is this helpful? How?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Where's your evidence banks ask about income before allowing an account? Perhaps you are thinking about a loan.
Click to expand...

First, I want to apologize about my post, as it was rude. I reacted emotionally.

Re: your question about evidence: I only have personal anecdotal evidence and anecdotal evidence from other working poor I know. I haven’t had a bank account in about 7 years. This is mostly my fault, as until last year I couldn’t find full time employment (I used to work for a major grocery store that hates anyone to work full time). Anyhow, I cash checks at the issuing banks, they always ask if I want an account there, then ask my income and deny me.
 
Childlike Empress said:
He has endorsed her and called her "his girl" way before she came on his show (for the second time) now.

Obviously she is the only one in the current set with the stones to beat Trump. If only the hoodwinked morons on the US "left" would be able to recognize an actual adult and stop cheering for fossils like creepy uncle Joe just because that's what the machine tells them to do. Trump would out-uncle him mercilessly as he already showed with that marvelous tweet welcoming him back.

As he would do with automatons like these Warren and Harris characters. And with Bernie who has already proven to not have what it takes to become POTUS.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

Someone who is just as if not more progressive like Warren and with more name recognition and approval and Bernie Sanders is just on another level in either category.

Gabbard's approach has been ineffectual so far. I don't know what she has that Sanders doesn't. It appears you like her cause you want her to withdraw the U.S. from everywhere while other actors continue to do their thing.
 
gabeygoat said:
First, I want to apologize about my post, as it was rude. I reacted emotionally.

Re: your question about evidence: I only have personal anecdotal evidence and anecdotal evidence from other working poor I know. I haven’t had a bank account in about 7 years. This is mostly my fault, as until last year I couldn’t find full time employment (I used to work for a major grocery store that hates anyone to work full time). Anyhow, I cash checks at the issuing banks, they always ask if I want an account there, then ask my income and deny me.
Click to expand...
I just double checked.

You are wrong and/or misunderstanding something. Banks ask about incomes because they collect and sell data, and your debit card also functions as a faux credit card.

But you don't have to tell them to get an account.
 
The_Animus said:
I don't get this sort of response. If you want to actually form an opinion about a candidate you should listen to them yourself and make your own determination rather than of rely on the interpretations of others.
Click to expand...
Absolutely agree. But I don't think it is reasonable to ask me to listen tp 2.5 HOURS of a talk show to get a sense of a candidate.
 
Brainster, I think a better way of listing the candidates is by who has/hasn't made the threshold to make the debates because if someone does not get in the debates, they aren't really a serious candidate.
 
Aridas said:
Biden! Front of the pack primarily because people think that he's the most electable!
Click to expand...
It's even simpler. "People" polled don't bother to get news or listen to candidates. Once they hear final nominees they pick one. Twitter, FB and Foxnews for minor help. Biden will win nomination largely by name recognition. Maybe a slight Obama factor.
 
Last edited:
SezMe said:
Absolutely agree. But I don't think it is reasonable to ask me to listen tp 2.5 HOURS of a talk show to get a sense of a candidate.
Click to expand...

Why even bother getting a sense of the candidate now? They could be gone by the time you get to make your meaningless decision about them.
 
SezMe said:
Brainster, I think a better way of listing the candidates is by who has/hasn't made the threshold to make the debates because if someone does not get in the debates, they aren't really a serious candidate.
Click to expand...

I will be happy to trim the list when the DNC announces who's in and who's out. I'll admit that Gravel is unlikely to make it, and de Blasio's team is apparently managing expectations by saying he doesn't have enough time to achieve the donor threshold.
 
Anyone see that trash woman Tulsi had her enemies list leaked? A lot of my Twitter friends are on it and it helps explain why they were being hit by an avalanche of BS reports the past month or so.
 
Baylor said:
But still very much fertile unlike the tired old hags who rule over Europe.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. You said childless = not bothered with the future of humanity. I mean, it's ridiculous on its face, and there are plenty of people with children who don't care about the future, and having kids would give you interest in their future, not humanity as a whole. As usual your logic is pretty broken.
 
To Elizabeth Warren STFU about the Game of Thrones final season. It's not making you look good.
And you should have know better then to proclaim a fictional characterin an ongoing show a role model for women...particularly since that character going over to The Dark Side as a real possbilitly was established in the First Season. I think the expression is "Don't Count Your CHickens Before They Are Hatched".
 
Travis said:
Anyone see that trash woman Tulsi had her enemies list leaked? A lot of my Twitter friends are on it and it helps explain why they were being hit by an avalanche of BS reports the past month or so.
Click to expand...
Trash woman? Are you honestly expecting informational discussion with that opening?

What is this "enemies list?"

How do you know these "Twitter friends" are really on this list?

What "BS reports" are you referring to?

How much is an avalanche?

Because right now all I'm thinking is this is a vague "question" full of a whole lot of accusations.
 
dudalb said:
To Elizabeth Warren STFU about the Game of Thrones final season. It's not making you look good.
Click to expand...

In your eyes.

A lot more young women will vote for her than old white men, so don't blame her for playing to her demographic instead of yours.

Old white men should have the experience to choose on policy and ignore the social media nonsense.
 
I hate to say it but I'm going all in behind Biden. I'm even registering as a Democrat. I've never registered as a member of a political party before. Today though I did. I really like Mayor Pete and I want him to get a national stage in the next administration because his ideas deserve one. I want Harris to be a running mate. There are others in the pack who need national stages but I care about beating Trump and I feel like Biden can do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom