Space is fake I tells ya!

[Steve001]

SciManDan's Tinfoil Tuesday vid. I thought Flat Earthers were nuts.


http://https://youtu.be/AczntG70upY

 

[bytewizard]

link bad

 

[Thermal]

link bad

Content worse

 

[Elagabalus]

HH is that you?



Oops:

 

[Steve001]

HH is that you?



Oops:

Thanks.

 

[bknight]

Content worse

How so I'm unable to open as bytewizard indicated.

 

[Thermal]

How so I'm unable to open as bytewizard indicated.

Saw content from that YouTuber elsewhere

 

[bknight]

Saw content from that YouTuber elsewhere

Ah, Ok.

 

[bknight]

Ah, Ok.

You saw content from SciManDan? And you believe that content to be suspicious in nature?

 

[Elagabalus]

You saw content from SciManDan? And you believe that content to be suspicious in nature?

It was from HH*.





* First rule of HH. Don't ask who is HH.

 

[p0lka]

Content worse

Well he does spend a lot of time critiquing flat earthers, so the content is kinda useless to them as they care not a jot about evidence.

I couldn't say that SciManDans' content is useless to everyone though, it would be useful resource material for anyone that is going down that flat earth rabbit hole.

SciManDan gets a thumbs up from me.

 

[bknight]

Well he does spend a lot of time critiquing flat earthers, so the content is kinda useless to them as they care not a jot about evidence.

I couldn't say that SciManDans' content is useless to everyone though, it would be useful resource material for anyone that is going down that flat earth rabbit hole.

SciManDan gets a thumbs up from me.

From a pure science vantage point I would agree.

 

[Thermal]

You saw content from SciManDan? And you believe that content to be suspicious in nature?

Not the guy himself. The actual content, ie the subject matter.

 

[p0lka]

Not the guy himself. The actual content, ie the subject matter.

What about the actual content, ie the subject matter did you find suspicious in nature?

for me, his channel is using science to explain the nonsense that flat earthers come out with, I can't see anything wrong with that stance.

 

[Thermal]

What about the content, ie the subject matter did you find suspicious in nature?

Not suspicious. Just eye rollingly bad. Google him, on cel now and awkward to link

 

[Elagabalus]

pssssssssst

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=12670327#post12670327