• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
hank hill said:
No. I post a thread on an interesting channel and expect a good conversation. That's all.
Click to expand...



You posted information about an interesting channel? When? We should be discussing that instead of this “Science 2.0” goober.
 
hank hill said:
Now we're dissecting this. That's all I ask. So Science 2.0, colonelcommand, and Nicolas Sequeira are all the same person?
Click to expand...

You want a dissecton? You got a dissection. Exhibit A:

hank hill said:
Ok. I'm not Nicolas Sequeira. Science 2.0 mentions Nicolas in his video on this thread, as well as in his challenge to BadPiggies9, who accused him of being the guy in question.
Click to expand...

No one said you were Nicky Nick. What an odd thing to say. Crusing Science2.0's 'about' page, he claims to be conservative blogger Salocin Arieuqes. That's Nicolas Sequeira backwards, of course. Protip, dog: if the 'u' dosn't follow the 'q', you tip your hand.

So no question, Science2.0 is Nickity Nick. Now Nicky, in his reddit account, busts u/thescience20's chops for being u/colonelcommand. So all three seem to be the same lying person. You have made it crystal clear that you are colonelcommand. Looking at your 'about me' page here, you claim to be both 17 years old and also an accountant born in 1985, and that you are from Chi town. But we know you're in the Mile High City, right? Actually, that might be more of the endless, endless BS you are shoveling.

All in, my analysis is that you are all the same cat who needs a better hobby. The rest of it is not that interesting.
 
hank hill said:
Here's an example.

Episode 1 of Science 2.0 is a broad subject, but even here we can note a pattern emerging. Here the stock photos correlate better with the dialogue than they do in later episodes. The porch light here seems to be working, and in later episodes the porch is darker. The porch light also works in the channel trailer. Here Science 2.0 also displays a peculiar habit of handling strange random objects. One of them is a Star Trek beam toy. Another is a VHS copy of Meet The Parents. Note the reference to sobriety.

Your turn, episode 2. See how easy this is?
Click to expand...

The porch light is darker. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
Seriously?
If this is your idea of intriguing and insightful analysis, you really should think again. I've encountered gravel that was more interesting than that.

Have you managed to raise the number of views for the video to over 350 yet?
 
Cosmic Yak said:
The porch light is darker. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.

Seriously?

If this is your idea of intriguing and insightful analysis, you really should think again. I've encountered gravel that was more interesting than that.



Have you managed to raise the number of views for the video to over 350 yet?
Click to expand...


I’m pretty sure my 11 year old can do a better job of analyzing the themes in the video. He could also make better videos. I know because I’ve seen the videos he made in the video production class he took last Summer.
 
Thermal said:
All in, my analysis is that you are all the same cat who needs a better hobby. The rest of it is not that interesting.
Click to expand...


I refuse to accept your conclusion because if I did the user agreement would apply to the dingleberry making the videos, which means I’d have to censor what I really think.
 
The most ***** insane channel on YouTube

A lot of the cray-cray I’ve posted here has been overtly disturbed people or creepy. Some crazy videos are cute and fun. For example:

 
hank hill said:
Here's an example.

Episode 1 of Science 2.0 is a broad subject, but even here we can note a pattern emerging. Here the stock photos correlate better with the dialogue than they do in later episodes. The porch light here seems to be working, and in later episodes the porch is darker. The porch light also works in the channel trailer. Here Science 2.0 also displays a peculiar habit of handling strange random objects. One of them is a Star Trek beam toy. Another is a VHS copy of Meet The Parents. Note the reference to sobriety.

Your turn, episode 2. See how easy this is?
Click to expand...
This isn't analysis, it's play-acting.
 
Thermal said:
You want a dissecton? You got a dissection. Exhibit A:



No one said you were Nicky Nick. What an odd thing to say. Crusing Science2.0's 'about' page, he claims to be conservative blogger Salocin Arieuqes. That's Nicolas Sequeira backwards, of course. Protip, dog: if the 'u' dosn't follow the 'q', you tip your hand.

So no question, Science2.0 is Nickity Nick. Now Nicky, in his reddit account, busts u/thescience20's chops for being u/colonelcommand. So all three seem to be the same lying person. You have made it crystal clear that you are colonelcommand. Looking at your 'about me' page here, you claim to be both 17 years old and also an accountant born in 1985, and that you are from Chi town. But we know you're in the Mile High City, right? Actually, that might be more of the endless, endless BS you are shoveling.

All in, my analysis is that you are all the same cat who needs a better hobby. The rest of it is not that interesting.
Click to expand...

So, wait... this person has 3 separate online "identities" that call each other out, make fun of each other, spam this channel, and then accuse each other of spamming this channel? And he just travels to different forums like a strolling minstrel to roll out his act?

That is so weird it's sad. It reminds of that lady who shut down a Harry Potter fanfiction forum years ago because she had an army of (her own) sockpuppets that caused drama by "stalking" her and others. (Yes, she stalked and insulted herself with her alts.) I can't remember her handle, but there are summaries of the story all over the net.


EDIT: Found it! This looks like a really long read, though. https://fanlore.org/wiki/The_Ms.Scribe_Story:_An_Unauthorized_Fandom_Biography
 
Last edited:
isissxn said:
So, wait... this person has 3 separate online "identities" that call each other out, make fun of each other, spam this channel, and then accuse each other of spamming this channel? And he just travels to different forums like a strolling minstrel to roll out his act?

That is so weird it's sad. It reminds of that lady who shut down a Harry Potter fanfiction forum years ago because she had an army of (her own) sockpuppets that caused drama by "stalking" her and others. (Yes, she stalked and insulted herself with her alts.) I can't remember her handle, but there are summaries of the story all over the net.


EDIT: Found it! This looks like a really long read, though. https://fanlore.org/wiki/The_Ms.Scribe_Story:_An_Unauthorized_Fandom_Biography
Click to expand...


Yup. Hank hill introduces the correct spelling of Nick's name to the thread completely out of the blue, and also out of the blue insists that he doesn't know who Nick is and that hank is not Nick. Then he pulls out this 'so are they all the same person' angle, again out of the clear blue sky. He literally can't keep track of his own BS. Colonelcommand on reddit also posts a lot of stuff created by Nick, like comics and movie reviews.

We all have our hobbies and quirks, I suppose.
 
He would be very poor at espionage.

"What do you think of my suit? Yeah, it's nice, but it's not like I'm a spy or anything. I kind of look like a spy in this outfit though, but that's it. So, have you ever been to Langley? Because I totally never have, why would you think that?" beat "Ask me if I'm a spy."
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom