• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
hank hill said:
All conspiracy theories are a waste of time. They can be discussed in a reasonable manner, though.
Click to expand...

No, they're not. A lot of interesting discussion can arise and the tangental arguments can be downright fascinating. However, there is no argument in the vids you are demanding we all read and analyze for you. If yahoo2.0 makes an account here and argues them, then great. It'll be a hoot. But to just sit here watching his boring ass vids and then critiquing them is dull as a bag of doorknobs.

Here is the critique of the entire series. It's boring and there is nothing fun to discuss. Done and done.
 
Has DV made an episode on Science 2.0 yet?

And will Science .0 be making a video on this thread? Either one would be more entertaining than your off-topic gibberish.
 
hank hill said:
If a conspiracy theory is proven right, it's not a conspiracy theory anymore.
Click to expand...

At that point it's a proven conspiracy, but you're asserting that discussing it before it's proven is a waste of time.

hank hill said:
Is Science 2.0 going to make a video on this thread?
Click to expand...

I don't know, are you?

hank hill said:
And what about DV?
Click to expand...

I doubt it. Tim may play a few clips the next time he feels like offering some cringe worthy comedic failure, but there really isn't any good content for him to use. You should try sending him links and time stamps for anything you think would be worth featuring.
 
hank hill said:
I suggest episode 11 about Trump for the DV show. That's the best one, I think. Scientology is also good.
Click to expand...

There are approximately a bajillion threads on those topics here already. They are likely much better in quality and analysis than these silly vids. Have at them.

Regarding this persona you seem enamoured of:

No. One. Cares.
 
hank hill said:
Why stay here, then?
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? How many different threads would Jesuit Bukkake bombs and Bat ball fungus be on-topic?

This is an intriguing webseries.
Click to expand...

Nope. Still dull. But please, write up your analysis of each episode and maybe someone will find it interesting and we could discuss it.

Your last review fell flat. Nothing interesting. Try again, say with episodes 2-30, and juice it up with some insightful pizzaz. Or Bat ball fungus. That goes over big too.
 
Thermal said:
Are you kidding? How many different threads would Jesuit Bukkake bombs and Bat ball fungus be on-topic?



Nope. Still dull. But please, write up your analysis of each episode and maybe someone will find it interesting and we could discuss it.

Your last review fell flat. Nothing interesting. Try again, say with episodes 2-30, and juice it up with some insightful pizzaz. Or Bat ball fungus. That goes over big too.
Click to expand...

I looked up "Bat ball fungus" and this was the top hit:

Ball State Researcher Working On Treatment For Bat-Killing Fungus

A biology professor at Ball State University is working with other Midwest researchers to find a treatment for a fungus that’s killing the country’s bats at a record rate.

Bats carry a negative reputation through most of the world. This week, scientists announced a theory that bats are the cause of the rapid spread of the Ebola virus that is devastating regions of Africa. But Ball State associate professor Tim Carter says bats play a critical role in our ecosystem.

“We do know for a fact that bats, and the bats here in Indiana, do consume all kinds of insects, including a lot of crop pests – spotted cucumber beetle, corn ear worm," says Carter. "It’s been estimated that US farmers save billions of dollars in pesticide applications because these bats are taking care of the insects for them.”
Click to expand...
 
isissxn said:
Regarding the Trump episode, I think he means this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19eaJj7kdoU
Click to expand...

isissxn uses "Post a Link." It's supper effective.

hank hill tries to learn "Post a link."

hank hill failed to learn "Post a Link."

hank hill is confused.

hank hill hurt itself in its confusion.

All kidding aside, the video feels like a 10 year old trying to imitate their parents' politics made it. The "symbolism" is comically heavy-handed and the image selection gives away the joke in an even more heavy handed manner. It lacks humor and lacks a point. It's as if the video was going for an "Ernest P. Worrell meets the Colbert Report" vibe and manged to fail to hit every note necessary to evoke either personality effectively. The video could have consisted of a close-up of someone in a MAGA hat saying, "I'm a clueless Trump supporter. Hur-dur, and I'm sofa king re-tired. Hurr, hurr," to achieve the same end. At least that would have the virtue of brevity, which this meandering waste of electrons lacks.
 
Last edited:
On this Science 2.0's discussion page, he says he is having a contest with Sean Cowes competing for likes, and the loser deletes his videos. Methinks this is a views race game.
 
Thermal said:
On this Science 2.0's discussion page, he says he is having a contest with Sean Cowes competing for likes, and the loser deletes his videos. Methinks this is a views race game.
Click to expand...

Could you please write up a couple paragraphs about Sean Cowes? Who is he? What's his deal? Is he doing parody or serious work?
 
theprestige said:
Are you intending to help hank hill drive traffic to that channel?
Click to expand...

No, but halleyscomet was looking for it anyway and couldn't find it. I figured most people wouldn't click if they didn't want to give him views.

If there's some way to edit the link so clicking it doesn't count as a view, I'll do it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom