• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
hank hill said:
We'll start with episode 1. Analyse it, please.
Click to expand...

Give us one good reason to waste time watching a painfully dull video and analyzing it in any context.

I mean, Batman's slimy hat...that's fun stuff. The girl was cute and is evidently willing to put up with a lot and has low standards. My kind of gal. That's time well spent. Relatively.

You propose the most boring of the boring to watch. Please give one good reason.
 
halleyscomet said:
Is this the one one you're asking us to review?

https://tinyurl.com/4poyc6x
Click to expand...

My man. That was honestly more engaging.

RE: the pastor's kid upthread. Man, that's dark. My experience with churches is that they were filled with good-hearted people. It's always disconcerting to hear what others have experienced. There will always be extreme cases where abuse went down, but I think of them as inevitable fringe cases. Can't tell you how surreal it is to hear how it is more common than I thought.
 
Thermal said:
My man. That was honestly more engaging.

RE: the pastor's kid upthread. Man, that's dark. My experience with churches is that they were filled with good-hearted people. It's always disconcerting to hear what others have experienced. There will always be extreme cases where abuse went down, but I think of them as inevitable fringe cases. Can't tell you how surreal it is to hear how it is more common than I thought.
Click to expand...

There was a schism building in the LCMS churches in the area. The schools run by the factions reflected that. The Lutheran school I transferred to for sixth through ninth grade was VERY well run by skilled, trained, competent staff. The LCMS high school I spent two years at was apparently an employment program for the otherwise unemployable spouses of church deacons. It had sex abuse issues that I found out later were far more explicit. There were even two teachers using their classes and a "homeroom donation trophy" as part of a proxy war over a girl they were both abusing.

My hope is the issues were limited to that faction.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys, would you mind reading all my posts and forming a consequent psychological profile of me? I'd just really like to hear some different theories that you may have about me and my work here. Just a quick summary, like "mostly silly," isn't going to cut it, because there is obviously a lot of nuance there that you guys missed but would perceive if you'd just give me and my work the attention it deserves. Me, me, me, what do you think about me?

No comments are allowed that aren't about me. In case you forgot the topic, it is me.
 
isissxn said:
Hey guys, would you mind reading all my posts and forming a consequent psychological profile of me? I'd just really like to hear some different theories that you may have about me and my work here. Just a quick summary, like "mostly silly," isn't going to cut it, because there is obviously a lot of nuance there that you guys missed but would perceive if you'd just give me and my work the attention it deserves. Me, me, me, what do you think about me?

No comments are allowed that aren't about me. In case you forgot the topic, it is me.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I'm already overdue with my dissertation on Time Cube Guy.
 
Here's an example.

Episode 1 of Science 2.0 is a broad subject, but even here we can note a pattern emerging. Here the stock photos correlate better with the dialogue than they do in later episodes. The porch light here seems to be working, and in later episodes the porch is darker. The porch light also works in the channel trailer. Here Science 2.0 also displays a peculiar habit of handling strange random objects. One of them is a Star Trek beam toy. Another is a VHS copy of Meet The Parents. Note the reference to sobriety.

Your turn, episode 2. See how easy this is?
 
isissxn said:
Hey guys, would you mind reading all my posts and forming a consequent psychological profile of me? I'd just really like to hear some different theories that you may have about me and my work here. Just a quick summary, like "mostly silly," isn't going to cut it, because there is obviously a lot of nuance there that you guys missed but would perceive if you'd just give me and my work the attention it deserves. Me, me, me, what do you think about me?

No comments are allowed that aren't about me. In case you forgot the topic, it is me.
Click to expand...

Young Lord Kenneth, is that you?
 
hank hill said:
Here's an example.

Episode 1 of Science 2.0 is a broad subject, but even here we can note a pattern emerging. Here the stock photos correlate better with the dialogue than they do in later episodes. The porch light here seems to be working, and in later episodes the porch is darker. The porch light also works in the channel trailer. Here Science 2.0 also displays a peculiar habit of handling strange random objects. One of them is a Star Trek beam toy. Another is a VHS copy of Meet The Parents. Note the reference to sobriety.

Your turn, episode 2. See how easy boring and what an utter waste of time this is?
Click to expand...

FTFY
 
wasapi said:
Young Lord Kenneth, is that you?
Click to expand...

Love is just a chemical reaction that makes people stupid! I am above it. You're just making fun of me because you're jealous of how I've shattered the mold.

Now pay more attention to me, but also **** off. But pay more attention to me while you're doing it. /lordkenneth

(If anyone is wondering how I know about this when I joined in 2014, I have read most of the legendary threads. Sometimes I'm just not in the mood for Russian literature.)
 
hank hill said:
Here's an example.

Episode 1 of Science 2.0 is a broad subject, but even here we can note a pattern emerging. Here the stock photos correlate better with the dialogue than they do in later episodes. The porch light here seems to be working, and in later episodes the porch is darker. The porch light also works in the channel trailer. Here Science 2.0 also displays a peculiar habit of handling strange random objects. One of them is a Star Trek beam toy. Another is a VHS copy of Meet The Parents. Note the reference to sobriety.

Your turn, episode 2. See how easy this is?
Click to expand...

I Googled "Episode 1 of Science 2.0 " and this was the first hit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To7we5gWnY8

I didn't see any content in that video that matches your description.

Next I searched for "Episode 1 of Science 2.0" and got this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aN7_jYkHjyA

It appears to be a discussion of the use of carbon fiber in the constriction of sticks for a sport. While a cool topic, I don't think it's what you had in mind.

Got a link to what you're talking about? You should be able to post links by now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom