• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
halleyscomet said:
If only he put as much effort into his YouTube channel as he does into his AstroTurfing.
Click to expand...

By all accounts, he's putting a lot of effort into his channel.

I think part of the problem is that the joke/satire/parody doesn't really last. Once you've looked at it for a minute or so, you get it. You don't need to keep going back for 60 more videos of the same basic gag.

And it turns out nobody here is very interested in figuring out the mental state of someone who's decided to produce 60 such videos anyway. Kind of like nobody here had much interest in analyzing the Time Cube guy.

---

One exception would be Donald Trump. If you want to get into the mental state of Donald Trump, you'll find plenty of threads here in which to indulge that interest. Including plenty of threads where other members will be more than happy to do all the work for you, so you can just sit back and read the content they've produced. If that's your pleasure, you might want to start here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=318937
 
halleyscomet said:
If only he put as much effort into his YouTube channel as he does into his AstroTurfing.
Click to expand...

Except that he showed his hand too soon by suddenly insisting that we all must watch all 60 videos.

OP has changed opinions and positions on said videos more times in a short amount of pages than Sybil.
 
hank hill said:
This thread isn't about Donald Trump. It's about this channel. Why can't anybody come up with some reasonable theories?
Click to expand...

Because no one cares. No one gives a rats pa-toody. But you seem too thick to comprehend that it is nothing but a parody thread now. I expect 'kittening' to start soon.
 
This has been nothing but hand waving since the beginning. Why won't anyone acknowledge this webseries' existence? It's obscure and I want to know more about it. That's all.
 
hank hill said:
This thread isn't about Donald Trump. It's about this channel. Why can't anybody come up with some reasonable theories?
Click to expand...

Several people have come up with reasonable theories. You're ignoring them. You say you want discussion and analysis, then ignore it when it's provided. A few people have actually gone there and watched a few videos and come back with theories, but you're ignoring them.

You keep saying this isn't about shilling the website, but all you're doing is shilling the website. It's true that you're shilling it by browbeating the people you're trying to enlist, which is a pants-on-head-retarded shilling technique, but that's pretty much what you're doing.
 
hank hill said:
This has been nothing but hand waving since the beginning. Why won't anyone acknowledge this webseries' existence? It's obscure and I want to know more about it. That's all.
Click to expand...



Are your reading the thread you’re posting in?

Your posts suggest you are not.

You’re exhibiting a disconnect from reality and inability to parse criticism I typically see in narcissists or people with delusions of adequacy. Are you perchance in management? An MBA student perhaps?
 
The only theory you're giving is that he's an idiot! I'm talking about a more detailed analysis. A whole paragraph or two on the details of this. There are details that you notice if you watch the whole thing.
 
theprestige said:
Several people have come up with reasonable theories. You're ignoring them. You say you want discussion and analysis, then ignore it when it's provided. A few people have actually gone there and watched a few videos and come back with theories, but you're ignoring them.

You keep saying this isn't about shilling the website, but all you're doing is shilling the website. It's true that you're shilling it by browbeating the people you're trying to enlist, which is a pants-on-head-retarded shilling technique, but that's pretty much what you're doing.
Click to expand...



It’s time we rolled back to the thread title. This thread was started to discuss insane YouTube content. The YouTuber mentioned by the OP failed to deliver. I came to this thread for content disconnected from reality. Since OP’s offering was a dud I will offer some options.

I’ll open things up with a classic. The nuclear bomb of Jesuit spunk that destroyed Canada.
https://youtu.be/pR-IdlAKrwc
 
The most ***** insane channel on YouTube

hank hill said:
The only theory you're giving is that he's an idiot! I'm talking about a more detailed analysis. A whole paragraph or two on the details of this. There are details that you notice if you watch the whole thing.
Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah, whatever. Half-assed YouTuber thinks his lazy, obvious, metaphors are “deep” and “require analysis” because he’s a narcissistic dipstick who doesn’t realize his content is crap. Same old, same old. There are literally thousands of YouTubers with similar acts.

Got anything that delivers on the thread title? Got anything on par with Rev. Manning’s assertions about the secret ingredient in Starbucks Coffee?
https://youtu.be/WC_BU0-rDSg
 
Last edited:
NO, this thread was stared with the intention of talking about "The most batseat insane channel on YouTube". I was referring to Science 2.0. if you feel he's not noteworthy, feel free to analyse the videos and tell me why.
 
hank hill said:
The only theory you're giving is that he's an idiot! I'm talking about a more detailed analysis. A whole paragraph or two on the details of this. There are details that you notice if you watch the whole thing.
Click to expand...

Nope. That's not the only theory.

Why don't you write a couple paragraphs about the details you've noticed?

Or are you still focused on trying to drive traffic to the site?
 
halleyscomet said:
It’s time we rolled back to the thread title. This thread was started to discuss insane YouTube content. The YouTuber mentioned by the OP failed to deliver. I came to this thread for content disconnected from reality. Since OP’s offering was a dud I will offer some options.

I’ll open things up with a classic. The nuclear bomb of Jesuit spunk that destroyed Canada.
https://youtu.be/pR-IdlAKrwc
Click to expand...

OMG! I remember that. Nukkake lady.
 
hank hill said:
NO, this thread was stared with the intention of talking about "The most batseat insane channel on YouTube". I was referring to Science 2.0. if you feel he's not noteworthy, feel free to analyse the videos and tell me why.
Click to expand...



Nah. Not worth the effort. I’ve studied literally and film analysis techniques. You can’t make a meal out of bones, and there isn’t even enough there to make bone broth.

Now, if you want to analyze something, I present this interview with a woman who is spending her retirement savings on a doomed effort at a music career.
https://youtu.be/riM17AGMjro
 
hank hill said:
You've watched all five hours of Science 2.0's content?
Click to expand...



Bits and pieces. If there’s a particular one you think is worth examining post it and I’ll take a closer glance, but I’m not plodding through five hours when my efforts so far have come up empty. When you’re digging a gold mine, you don’t keep sinking shafts in places that are already riddled with tunnels that never turned up a dime’s worth of ore. I’m an old school MST3K fan but even I have my limits when it comes to crap content.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom