hank hill
Thinker
Have a link of that?
Science 2.0 Episode By Episode
- Status
Thermal
August Member
RoboTimbo already provided it. Go to the discussion with colonelSpammand and click on Boring Science20's comments. I think you are quite familiar with them.
Also, it helps if you direct your questions. This isn't a text session, and it can get confusing what post you are responding to when multiple posters are in.
hank hill
Thinker
Any other links- any that would say why this series exists? The reddit of Science 2.0 is the same as the channel. Just a front.
Dr.Sid
Philosopher
The guy even responded to me in the comments, and fast. IMHO it's primarily artist. He sees woo videos as specific art form, and he wants to participate. He's there certainly for the form, not the content. And he's trolling people from both sides. But he's certainly troll, not believer.
hank hill
Thinker
What did he say? Looking through his comment sections, he's very much active. Anything to give away what this is?
Thermal
August Member
Right. That's the thing. It's just some wannabe 'wild and crazy guy', like all the others. What is there to theorize about? How his mommy and daddy didn't give him enough attention? How his Incel postings didn't get enough upvotes? There's just nothing remotely unusual going on here that hasn't been discussed and debunked a thousand times over.
hank hill
Thinker
This guy is insignificant, I know that. All I ask is to know who he is. I assume he must have something else somewhere out there.
Thermal
August Member
You're at the wrong site for doxxing. That's 4chan territory. We discuss skeptically here. In theory, I mean.
hank hill
Thinker
Discuss his videos skeptically, then. And dox him secondarily. I don't have to know who he is, I just want a full effort analysis of what this channel is supposed to mean.
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
"Visit this website."
Obviously not, or you'd be doing it instead of insisting that other people do it for you.
You want others to produce content for you.
A few people have actually visited the site and talked about it here. But you're not engaging with them. So it doesn't seem like you think there's much to talk about after all.
Last edited:
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 23,296
No.
hank hill
Thinker
I don't ask that you watch the videos to agree with them, I ask that you watch his videos and explain them with a skeptical mindset.
Dr.Sid
Philosopher
My exchange with him, on the chemtrails video (copy-pasted, including typos):
---
Me:
You left a spot ! Oh, ok, thanks.
Science 2.0:
This SPOT was on pupoise to shows that we can stop the EVIL CHEMTRAILS and reverse this UGLY vidyo
Me:
Wow, very deep !
Science 2.0:
I is such a DEEPS and a philosophotizer. Howd you getting to my fine show, Sirs?
I does a FINE show! watches more my fact, shall astonishers
---
IMHO the nature of this endeavor is clear.
---
Me:
You left a spot ! Oh, ok, thanks.
Science 2.0:
This SPOT was on pupoise to shows that we can stop the EVIL CHEMTRAILS and reverse this UGLY vidyo
Me:
Wow, very deep !
Science 2.0:
I is such a DEEPS and a philosophotizer. Howd you getting to my fine show, Sirs?
I does a FINE show! watches more my fact, shall astonishers
---
IMHO the nature of this endeavor is clear.
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
You want a full effort analysis? Seriously?
You have grievously overestimated the degree of entitlement that's appropriate for you here.
Thermal
August Member
Why? I got all I needed in under 50 seconds. Under no circumstances does that boring ass stuff get a full view from me unless there is a damn good reason. I'm not armchair psychoanalyzing some kid unless there's a payoff.
Butter!
Rough Around the Edges
Wow, he's not even trying that hard.
hank hill
Thinker
There is a payoff- the fact that nobody before now has noticed this series. A good analysis could go down in the annals of Internet history.
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Feel free to test that theory any time.
- Status