• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
hank hill said:
Not my channel. Again, all I ask for are some theories on any video, or any reference this guy makes. There are a lot and I want to understand what this thing is. Any details are appreciated.
Click to expand...

How did you find such an obscure channel with only 33 subs and no redeeming qualities?
 
At random. I was looking up "Science 2.0" (which is a new proposal towards the scientific process) and came across this channel, and it was bizarre, and here we are.
 
bknight said:
There is another real possibility (S)he wants whatever the small click fee is being paid to him(her)
Click to expand...

He/she insists he is not astroturfing. I suppose I believe it. But the persistence is what makes it really seem that way to many posters, especially all over a channel with 33 subscribers. I could probably get 33 knobs to subscribe to a channel. Hell, I bet I could get 34.

It's such a drop in the bucket, there's just no reason to care. It's like the stuff that shows up on that DeepIntoYoutube subreddit.

Here is one of my favorites from there.


What's going on with this guy, huh? What is his message? What does he really mean? Bump, bump, bump, anyone? I can't think of anything else, I really need to figure this out, I'm getting riled from the not knowing, MY SKIN IS SPIDERS!
 
Last edited:
See, that's what makes me crazy about this guy. Only 33 subscribers, and yet over 50 videos altogether. Why make so many videos if nobody has subscribed to you? Why persist like he has? Why even think that someone as big as AronRa would debate him?

Also, that video you put above is nonsense. This channel has a constant theme.
 
hank hill said:
This thing has an entire universe around it. There's a detailed mythos, countless Easter Eggs. Not only that, but I can't tell if this guy is being sarcastic or not. Most of his videos are obviously jokes, but even then, this is some good satire. Truly horrifying. Is it a joke?
Click to expand...

How did you determine that there are countless Easter eggs after viewing 3 of the videos?
 
I feel that Science 2.0 is probably pulling our legs, saying that AronRa would debate him. Science 2.0 wasn't even able to debate SciManDan back in January. For an example of how well Science 2.0 debates, I would suggest viewing the full MCToon debate.
 
Did Richard Dawkins leave the planet recently? He must have taken Penn & Teller with him too, along with Bill Maher.

Jeez, imagine the pedantry in that spaceship. I'd think I was lucky to be there for about 5 minutes, and then before long, I'd be scrabbling to open the airlock.
 
By constant theme, I mean to say that this is a consistent webseries, not that the topics always line up. Of course they don't- this is from the view of a lunatic, remember.
 
hank hill said:
Any theories or thoughts yet?
Click to expand...

Here's the thing, as others have said: there's nothing much interesting going on with this YouTuber. Some guy saying inconsequential stuff. Just can't work up a reason to give a horse's petootie. Or even a pony's taint. Just don't care what he says or why.
 
hank hill said:
See, that's what makes me crazy about this guy. Only 33 subscribers, and yet over 50 videos altogether. Why make so many videos if nobody has subscribed to you? Why persist like he has?
Click to expand...

Because he's a nut?

Why even think that someone as big as AronRa would debate him?
Click to expand...

Who?

Also, that video you put above is nonsense. This channel has a constant theme.
Click to expand...
 
I have no idea why nobody knows who AronRa is. The guy had a debate with Kent Hovind a while back, even.

If you are not interested in this channel, you don't need to post in this thread. Again, this thread is for proposed theories, not dismissal. I'm interested in this thing as I believe it's one of the most insane things ever released. Mkay?
 
hank hill said:
If you are not interested in this channel, you don't need to post in this thread.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing about 33 people are interested in his channel and none of them post here. I'm also going to guess that about seven of those 33 are his own aliases.

Again, this thread is for proposed theories, not dismissal. I'm interested in this thing as I believe it's one of the most insane things ever released. Mkay?
Click to expand...

Have you posted comments on his videos on YouTube?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom