Mueller Investigation pt5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Captain_Swoop said:
Trump Tweets

According to polling, few people seem to care about the Russian Collusion Hoax, but some Democrats are fighting hard to keep the Witch Hunt alive. They should focus on legislation or, even better, an investigation of how the ridiculous Collusion Delusion got started - so illegal!
Click to expand...
Washing down his hamberders with Pepto Bismol is my guess.
 
theprestige said:
Or is this a frustrated paralegal with an opinion and boyfriend who went to the media with anonymous pillow talk?
Click to expand...
A couple of weeks ago, the US House of Representatives voted 420-0 for "the public release of any report Special Counsel Mueller provides to the Attorney General, except to the extent the public disclosure of any portion thereof is expressly prohibited by law."

When passage of that resolution by unanimous consent was proposed in the Senate, Lindsey Graham objected because he wanted to amend its straightforward bipartisan goal by calling for appointment of a special counsel to investigate the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Speaking of the Mueller report, Donald Trump said "Let it come out. Let people see it." More recently, however, Trump has characterized calls to release the report as a "waste of time" and a "disgrace", while his press secretary has said people calling for the report's release are "sore losers" who need to move on. (I assume she didn't mean to imply Trump's earlier calls for releasing the report made him a sore loser.)

If/when Mueller's report is released, theprestige's question won't matter. What matters is what the report says. Lindsey Graham, Sarah Sanders, and Trump's other minions want us to waste our time with questions such as the one asked by theprestige. I assume that is theprestige's goal as well. I'd rather see the report.

JoeMorgue said:
Nobody is stupid here.
Click to expand...
Speak for yourself.
;)
 
Last edited:
CapelDodger said:
Well said.
Click to expand...
It is subjective. I don't mind being called on that. I could easily be wrong.

But I'm sure there are some in the GOP who realize that sitting on the report does not look good for the party. If they can leak it and not get blamed, they will.
 
Childlike Empress said:
The sub-subject was that Teh Donald isn't funny and his request to Russia to release Killary's eMails couldn't possibly have been in jest. Which is of course ridiculous and a completely desperate "argument" to make.

Maybe it would be a sensible step for you to just accept that the sickness of the most sophisticated propaganda system ever invented by mankind has little to do with what you once did in local journalism, and nobody is blaming you for it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, “in jest.” “Ridiculous.”
 

Attachments

  • FCD749EC-D71E-491C-9D3A-1AE4D6E40943.jpg
    FCD749EC-D71E-491C-9D3A-1AE4D6E40943.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 28
Regnad Kcin said:
Yeah, “in jest.” “Ridiculous.”
Click to expand...


^LOL never forget this cartoon buddy.

ZNItnZS.jpg
 
Childlike Empress said:
^LOL never forget this cartoon buddy.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/ZNItnZS.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
I’m unclear, “buddy,” how your cartoon negates Donald Trump’s clear and direct insistence that, contrary to your belief that it’s “a completely desperate argument to make,” his original call out to Russia wasn’t “in jest.”

“Buddy.”
 
Regnad Kcin said:
I’m unclear, “buddy,” how your cartoon negates Donald Trump’s clear and direct insistence that, contrary to your belief that it’s “a completely desperate argument to make,” his original call out to Russia wasn’t “in jest.”

“Buddy.”
Click to expand...
That cartoon is quite the propaganda piece.
 
W.D.Clinger said:
A couple of weeks ago, the US House of Representatives voted 420-0 for "the public release of any report Special Counsel Mueller provides to the Attorney General, except to the extent the public disclosure of any portion thereof is expressly prohibited by law."

When passage of that resolution by unanimous consent was proposed in the Senate, Lindsey Graham objected because he wanted to amend its straightforward bipartisan goal by calling for appointment of a special counsel to investigate the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.
Click to expand...
I don't understand Graham. Is the Senate really happy to kill the report without even knowing what's in it? That seems pretty risky to me.
 
W.D.Clinger said:
When passage of that resolution by unanimous consent was proposed in the Senate, Lindsey Graham objected because he wanted to amend its straightforward bipartisan goal by calling for appointment of a special counsel to investigate the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails.
Click to expand...

It's been blocked 5 times. Quoting from another source:

On 3/14/19, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) voted to block a resolution to make the Mueller report public.
On 3/25/19, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voted to block a resolution to make the Mueller report public.
On 3/27/19, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voted to block a resolution to make the Mueller report public.
On 3/28/19, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) voted to block a resolution to make the Mueller report public.
On 4/2/19, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) voted to block a resolution to make the Mueller report public.
Click to expand...
 
Regnad Kcin said:
I’m unclear, “buddy,” how your cartoon negates Donald Trump’s clear and direct insistence that, contrary to your belief that it’s “a completely desperate argument to make,” his original call out to Russia wasn’t “in jest.”
Click to expand...


It's the same story like with the Mueller report now. The Russians probably have it, somebody said earlier. You lot want your hands on it. If you asked here - not knowing if they really have it - the Russians to release it, it wouldn't mean you colluded with them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom