Mueller Investigation pt5

[Childlike Empress]

He confirms btw that the sole topic of the twenty minutes meeting was the Magnitzky act for which to lobby against the female Russian lawyer was on US tour. Which is an honorable task, btw, because the story behind that law is a ridiculous hoax which seems to unravel now anyway. Make sure to watch the documentary while it is available for free.

 

[Belz...]

You aren’t doing your credibility any favors here.

Well, he's not wrong. Every "joke" we're told he's uttered was labeled as such after the fact. The only actual joke I heard him do is when the power went out and he jokingly blamed the intelligence agencies.

The man isn't much for humour.

 

[Belz...]

This was explained by Q

...months ago

Q's like Nostradamus. His cultists make him say whatever they want to hear.

 

[Belz...]

Sorry, but is the big Trump defense here: "technically, what he and his campaign did might not have been illegal" ?
Is that really the standard you want to apply to all past, current and future Presidents?

And yet Clinton's process crime about a not-illegal act was vilified by some of the same posters here for years.

 

[applecorped]

First, I don't give a **** about what the First Amendment covers ........

 

[thaiboxerken]

Do you roll your eyes at your deity, Trump, when he ignores the 1st amendment?

 

[Belz...]

Do you roll your eyes at your deity, Trump, when he ignores the 1st amendment?

Amendments and commandments are only what dear leader decides they are.

 

[a_unique_person]

If Benghazi can take up five years of enquiries Trump must have enough material for 100 years worth.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Trump Tweets

In 1998, Rep.Jerry Nadler strongly opposed the release of the Starr Report on Bill Clinton. No information whatsoever would or could be legally released. But with the NO COLLUSION Mueller Report, which the Dems hate, he wants it all. NOTHING WILL EVER SATISFY THEM! @foxandfriends

 

[Belz...]

If Benghazi can take up five years of enquiries Trump must have enough material for 100 years worth.

When the sun expands and engulfs the earth, they'll probably still be busy fact-checking Trump's claims.

 

[Fast Eddie B]

And yet Clinton's process crime about a not-illegal act was vilified by some of the same posters here for years.

Which act was that?

 

[Belz...]

Which act was that?

Getting a blowjob is not illegal.

 

[newyorkguy]

Trump Tweets In 1998, Rep.Jerry Nadler strongly opposed the release of the Starr Report on Bill Clinton. No information whatsoever would or could be legally released. But with the NO COLLUSION Mueller Report, which the Dems hate, he wants it all. NOTHING WILL EVER SATISFY THEM! @foxandfriends

Imagine for a moment, Barack Obama had lost the 2008 election by almost 3 million votes -but won in the Electoral College by virtue of winning two states by a margin of less than 200,000 votes. Then it comes out that the Saudi government had orchestrated a hack of the RNC computers and released the material to WikiLeaks. Not only that, a group of Saudis, including Saudi military, had spent millions of dollars on social media platforms, posting pro-Obama/anti-McCain messaging while pretending to be Americans. That while all this was happening members of the Obama campaign -- including Obama family members -- were meeting with various Saudis. Some of whom were promising "dirt" on John McCain.

Can you imagine the reaction from the right/Fox/Republicans? From people like Ted Cruz, Bill O'Reilly, Mitch McConnell, Ann Coulter, etc? Can you imagine the reaction? Because I can't. I don't want to!

 

[Fast Eddie B]

Getting a blowjob is not illegal.

Agreed. I thought you were talking about a different Clinton.

That said, I do think it’s wrong to trivialize lying under oath. A “process” crime is still a crime.

 

[BobTheCoward]

He confirms btw that the sole topic of the twenty minutes meeting was the Magnitzky act for which to lobby against the female Russian lawyer was on US tour. Which is an honorable task, btw, because the story behind that law is a ridiculous hoax which seems to unravel now anyway. Make sure to watch the documentary while it is available for free.

Do you think bill browder is lying?

 

[Belz...]

Agreed. I thought you were talking about a different Clinton.

Yeah after I posted that I thought it might be confusing.

That said, I do think it’s wrong to trivialize lying under oath. A “process” crime is still a crime.

I know. I was poking fun at the Trump defenders here. Obviously they'd never agree that it was a process crime, because (D).

 

[Ziggurat]

My credibility has nothing to do with it. You think Trump knows how to make a joke provide evidence.

I didn't say it was a good joke. And have you ever seen him on Letterman?

 

[Childlike Empress]

Do you think bill browder is lying?

There's no need to have an opinion on that. Watch the film. It's extraordinary.

 

[BobTheCoward]

There's no need to have an opinion on that. Watch the film. It's extraordinary.

There is no need to have an opinion on almost everything.

Do you think Browder is lying?

 

[Childlike Empress]

There is no need to have an opinion on almost everything.

Do you think Browder is lying?

You mean right now? About what?

Not with me, Bob.