Aridas
Crazy Little Green Dragon
How are Americans not thrilled that they found nothing rising to the level of a prosecutable crime?
There are a few answers to address different aspects of this. First, of course, Mueller's probe did find quite a few things that rise to the level of a prosecutable crime. It's been the most successful of of its kind, in that respect, even. Second, when it comes to Trump, Trump was not going to be prosecuted regardless, given DOJ policy, so him not being charged means nearly nothing at all. Of more interest is what's going on with those like Trump Jr. and his Trump Tower meeting that was done specifically with intent that breaks the law, followed by his recitation of the lies he was directed to tell to Congress. Third, well... Barr provided only the barest of answers to the various questions at hand, under circumstances where it's hard not to take his selectiveness as anything other than a blatant attempt to protect Trump in exactly the way that he was specifically chosen to do.
If Trump actually didn't collude with foreign powers, GOOD! When what we've currently got is little more than bare assertion from a Trump toadie that that's the case, though, it's not particularly convincing. Even moreso when the evidence in the public sphere that points quite firmly to such happening remains completely unaddressed.
Man, you must be pissed at Obama for not doing anything.
At last check... He did do a few things. Looks like W.D. Clinger went into that more in detail though.
I was expecting more. A Congressional statement doesn’t do anything real. It would have changed nothing had McConnell signed off on it. Was that Obama’s best plan of response?
Out of order here, but... Several other measures than the congressional statement were referenced in the article.
I'm amused that you think issuing statements and saying something to Putin constitute doing something. Expelling some diplomats is something, but not much, certainly not enough to dissuade Russia.
You know what's strangely lacking from your list? Any attempt by the Obama administration to warn the Trump campaign about Russian activities. It's almost like they weren't actually worried about the possibility of Russia affecting the election, they only wanted an opportunity to nail Trump for doing something bad.
...Trump and campaign WAS warned, though? That's one of the big reasons that Trump's "joke" request to Russia isn't actually credibly a joke. And that's before getting to his clarification that it wasn't really a joke in an interview from shortly after saying it.
Yes. And anyone else who is should be disappointed by Obama's failures in that regard.
But I'm even more concerned by China's cyber attacks, which were far more severe and consequential, and which have gone unanswered. But they don't play into the anti-Trump narrative, so they don't get much attention even though they deserve more.
Mmm. There's been a somewhat longstanding issue there, as I understand it, though. There have been quite a few sectors in the US that have been rather slow to adapt and take proper precautions, last I heard, including the military. It's one of the issues that certainly does deserve more attention, albeit relatively quiet attention. As plague311 pointed out, though, Trump's not only not ramped things up on that front, he's intentionally undermined the attempts to address the problems that were already in action. That's just one of the many strikes against him, in my opinion.
By this time tomorrow, the conventional wisdom will be that the Mueller report contains a smoking gun, and that Barr is covering it up.
Hmm? Among who?
The hilited prediction has a reasonable chance of being correct. IMO the important thing is for your described procedure to take place. The full unredacted support should be vetted by your congress.
I'm in agreement with this. That is the most important thing, to start with. With that said, though... there's quite a bit that the public likely needs to be informed of, at this point, to address much of the information already floating around.
Does McConnell even know what is actually in the report?
Some of the stuff that's reasonably likely to be addressed a bit, like the NRA stuff, is fairly certain to be rather damning to the Republican Party. Fear of that alone would be enough for him to want to block it, I think.
"I would release it but I'm under audit."
Perhaps better said as "If I released it, I would be under audit."
Last edited: