Mumbles
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2008
- Messages
- 8,726
Trump Tweets
Campaigning for the Popular Vote is much easier & different than campaigning for the Electoral College. It’s like training for the 100 yard dash vs. a marathon. The brilliance of the Electoral College is that you must go to many States to win. With the Popular Vote, you go to....
....just the large States - the Cities would end up running the Country. Smaller States & the entire Midwest would end up losing all power - & we can’t let that happen. I used to like the idea of the Popular Vote, but now realize the Electoral College is far better for the U.S.A.
In reality, the two candidates spend the great majority of their time in about 5-6 states, while a far higher number of states receive 0-2 visits - there's simply no point in spending time or money in a state where one or the other is certain to win. In fact, here's a map that illustrates the problem - those small midwest /mountain states are still being ignored. Savvier people will watch the debates, and the conventions. Less politically connected people, regardless of why they're less connected, watch the news highlights or nothing at all. And if all they see is the type of nonsense horserace coverage and obsession with emails like last time, that goes badly. And this goes for ads, people on the ground (still tough in rural areas), and campaign surrogates as well.
The actual question is "How do you pull this off", and on that...I don't really know.