Anti-Muslim Terrorist Attack in... NZ?

That question's been asked a few times now, and I bet the GCSB (NZ's electronic security service) is frantically getting that started.

One of the issues that the GCSB faces is that it's banned from domestic spying, as is the SIS.
 
The 17 year old got what he deserved. He assaulted a man, that man turned and defended himself. That's what I saw. Should he have done it? No, but I sure enjoyed watching it.

I hear this Anning guy is some kind of a-hole, but I'm only judging by what I see in the video.

Some do-gooder thinks it's okay to assault people if they say things that upset him, just like some posters here. He got exactly what he asked for.

The bodyguards attacking him after, not so good, but I absolutely defend Anning for turning and punching him. The kid did attack him. I have no problem with the way it happened personally.

There is enough scope for punching someone in self-defence when you don’t know what’s come your way. I think that’s a fair trade, but his goons went way beyond what was reasonable and proportionate.

I don’t want violence to become legitimized or commonplace in politics, and I disagree with violent assault on any politician. Hopefully Anning will get voted out and simply fall over and break his neck.
 
That question's been asked a few times now, and I bet the GCSB (NZ's electronic security service) is frantically getting that started.
_____________________________

Meanwhile, the NZ Police, determined to keep the stable door firmly shut too late, are still guarding mosques with armed cops. This is in Otahuhu, Auckland, 1000 km from the action.

Plenty of overtime available right now.

http://charman.co.nz/mosque.jpg

Never have just one isolated guard. All what a person needs to do is walk up to this person, shoot him at point blank range with a small hand gun, then carry on. You should always have a second person keeping an eye on the first. Then 6 more people able to respond within minutes if anything happens. So Yes, this is just for the show and overtime.


Fraser Anning punches teen after being egged while speaking to media in MelbourneHe barely has any political support, yet he's still there.

This guy and his thugs are a piece of work. :mad:

He was only elected due to a one off freak series of events. He will not be reelected.
 
One of the issues that the GCSB faces is that it's banned from domestic spying, as is the SIS.

I think the line opens up for them when overseas sites are involved, and there always are. Anyway, if not GCSB, then the oxymoronic police intelligence.
 
There is enough scope for punching someone in self-defence when you don’t know what’s come your way. I think that’s a fair trade, but his goons went way beyond what was reasonable and proportionate.

I don’t want violence to become legitimized or commonplace in politics, and I disagree with violent assault on any politician. Hopefully Anning will get voted out and simply fall over and break his neck.

I suspect the police will charge Anning’s goons, and probably eggboy as well. It will be interesting to see the outcome.

Anning won’t be re-elected. He got in by a freakish sequence of events.
 
Oh right - "ironic" racism...

I think this is all part of the alt-right patois. They spend a lot of time in communication with each other, trading similar memes and making self-referential in-jokes, that what is unintelligible to normal people, has gained its own meaning among their crowd. That upside down OK sign, that frog, "remove kebab", "subscribe to PewDiePie", is just their way of winking at each other.
 
I suspect the police will charge Anning’s goons, and probably eggboy as well. It will be interesting to see the outcome.

Anning won’t be re-elected. He got in by a freakish sequence of events.

ETA posted before I saw rjh01’s post.
 
Never have just one isolated guard. All what a person needs to do is walk up to this person, shoot him at point blank range with a small hand gun, then carry on. You should always have a second person keeping an eye on the first. Then 6 more people able to respond within minutes if anything happens. So Yes, this is just for the show and overtime.

There's one armed cop in the photograph. But that doesn't mean there aren't more off-camera.
 
Probably been mentioned, but a weird fact

If this had happened in the US it would be their second worse mass shooting in modern US history.

Pretty screwed up really
 
I think the line opens up for them when overseas sites are involved, and there always are. Anyway, if not GCSB, then the oxymoronic police intelligence.

Unless you think that the police should searching through absolutely every NZ Citizen and Resident's Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other social media accounts all the time, looking for extremists, then unless someone was aware of this guy's actions and reported him, I can't see why you think he should have been located.
 
Unless you think that the police should searching through absolutely every NZ Citizen and Resident's Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other social media accounts all the time, looking for extremists, then unless someone was aware of this guy's actions and reported him, I can't see why you think he should have been located.

Not sure why this is an issue

I have zero problem with gun licence appliers having to supply their social media profiles and extra searches being done by the people giving them out.

Just add it to the list
 
Not sure why this is an issue

I have zero problem with gun licence appliers having to supply their social media profiles and extra searches being done by the people giving them out.

Just add it to the list

I'm not saying just "gun licence appliers", I'm pretty sure I was the first to raise that particular thing in this thread, I'm talking about ALL NZers.
 
Unless you think that the police should searching through absolutely every NZ Citizen and Resident's Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other social media accounts all the time, looking for extremists, then unless someone was aware of this guy's actions and reported him, I can't see why you think he should have been located.
The only possible means is to get people to say something when they see it.
 
I'm not saying just "gun licence appliers", I'm pretty sure I was the first to raise that particular thing in this thread, I'm talking about ALL NZers.

Fair enough, apologies

I agree all NZer's would be a bit silly

It would also make the whole "GCSB has too much control" argument by the left a few years back look a bit silly if they suddenly decide the SIS should be able to mine citizens info'
 
Typo, I meant to hit the 4, sadly I didn't see that another body has been found. This makes it worse than Featherston, and thus our worse ever mass killing.

And unfortunately at 50 deaths this now makes a new record for New Zealand for massacres over the past couple of centuries. Previous to this there was the Featherston war camp riot which had 49 deaths in 1943. Oh such a sad day that we learn that this has now been exceeded.


OH PUHLEASE!!!!

Featherston was an open revolt by Japanese POWs during WW2. It is in no way relevant or comparable to this. The POWs had already made one attempt at and armed revolt on Christmas eve the year before
 
Last edited:
Not sure why this is an issue

I have zero problem with gun licence appliers having to supply their social media profiles and extra searches being done by the people giving them out.

Just add it to the list

Yep, the onus needs to be switched. Rather than the Police having to prove that you are not a fit and proper person, the applicant should have to prove that they are.
 
Unless you think that the police should searching through absolutely every NZ Citizen and Resident's Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other social media accounts all the time, looking for extremists, then unless someone was aware of this guy's actions and reported him, I can't see why you think he should have been located.

I wonder what would have happened if someone had reported his Facebook posts to police? Would it have made a difference? Or was what was in his Facebook page too vague to act on?
 
I wonder what would have happened if someone had reported his Facebook posts to police? Would it have made a difference? Or was what was in his Facebook page too vague to act on?

I'm personally thinking Facebook has a fair bit of in looking at the moment

If they have algorithms that can pick up a chicks nipple and delete it, it can't be that hard to have alerts for uber amounts of posts of guns and key words of hate, they can pick up and report.

Problem is the whole "We are just a platform, not a media outlet, you can't put the onus on us" argument
 
Why? The kid attacked first. Anning defended himself and his bodyguards neutralized the threat without excessive force.

The kid is now out of jail, and no charges will be brought against him. Anning and his goons may be charged with assault though.

This is what happens in countries where, unlike the US, "Assault" is not defined as "that person looked at me the wrong way and now I'm scared bohoo".

We are not all as laughably weak as you are.
 

Back
Top Bottom