Status
Not open for further replies.
To touch on Manafort appearing in court in a wheelchair. Back in October of last year it was reported (this is from Bloomberg):
Manafort was wheeled into the courtroom, the same one where he had appeared daily in a business suit during his three-week trial. “There are significant issues about Mr. Manafort’s health right now,” defense attorney Kevin Downing told the judge. “A lot of it has to do with his terms of confinement.” Ellis responded: “I’m not the judge who ordered those terms of confinement.” Manafort, who’s been in custody since June 15, appeared in a jail jumpsuit after Ellis denied his request to appear at the hearing in street clothes. Link

Based on the lawyer's statement that Manafort's medical condition has a lot "to do with his terms of confinement," plus the failure to give any specifics as to exactly what that medical condition is, it does seem possible Manafort is trying to use his appearance to gain sympathy from the public (and Donald Trump?) plus leniency from the court. It reminds me of a New York Mafioso boss who, when he was on trial years ago, came to court strapped to a gurney with an oxygen mask attached. At one point the Mafioso's lawyer interrupted the proceedings to ask for a recess claiming his client was having a sudden medical emergency. That backfired because the court summoned NY City EMS who examined the defendant and pronounced his vital signs normal. But EMS then transported him to an emergency room as a precaution and that also backfired. The emergency room they took him to was in a city hospital and the doctors there reported finding nothing wrong. The court was not too happy.

At the same time, on a human level, I do sympathize with Manafort. He always appeared to me to be someone who was pretty soft, having led a life of privileged affluence. The situation he finds himself in now must be extremely stressful and stress can easily effect someone's health. Manafort is looking into the abyss. Faced with losing most of his money and having to spend years in prison. He must ask himself, "How the hell did I put myself in this position?" At the age of 69 he's pretty much at the end of the road. Very bleak future. Anybody would be profoundly depressed.

.
 

Attachments

  • Manafort in wheelchair.jpg
    Manafort in wheelchair.jpg
    91.9 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
To touch on Manafort appearing in court in a wheelchair. Back in October of last year it was reported (this is from Bloomberg):


Based on the lawyer's statement that Manafort's medical condition has a lot "to do with his terms of confinement," plus the failure to give any specifics as to exactly what that medical condition is, it does seem possible Manafort is trying to use his appearance to gain sympathy from the public (and Donald Trump?) plus leniency from the court. It reminds me of a New York Mafioso boss who, when he was on trial years ago, came to court strapped to a gurney with an oxygen mask attached. At one point the Mafioso's lawyer interrupted the proceedings to ask for a recess claiming his client was having a sudden medical emergency. That backfired because the court summoned NY City EMS who examined the defendant and pronounced his vital signs normal. But EMS then transported him to an emergency room as a precaution and that also backfired. The emergency room they took him to was in a city hospital and the doctors there reported finding nothing wrong. The court was not too happy.

At the same time, on a human level, I do sympathize with Manafort. He always appeared to me to be someone who was pretty soft, having led a life of privileged affluence. The situation he finds himself in now must be extremely stressful and stress can easily effect someone's health. Manafort is looking into the abyss. Faced with losing most of his money and having to spend years in prison. He must ask himself, "How the hell did I put myself in this position?" At the age of 69 he's pretty much at the end of the road. Very bleak future. Anybody would be profoundly depressed.

.

I don't feel sorry for someone whose daughters' describe as lacking a moral compass and questioning whether he's coerced their mother into orgies.
 
Yes, but at least some of the charges Manafort faced in the first trial involved bank fraud related to real estate. I'm just concerned that some of these new charges might get thrown out because they are related to incidents and charges he's been on trial for federally.

From Wikipedia...

Conversely, double jeopardy comes with a key exception. Under the dual sovereignty doctrine, multiple sovereigns can indict a defendant for the same crime. The federal and state governments can have overlapping criminal laws, so a criminal offender may be convicted in individual states and federal courts for exactly the same crime or for different crimes arising out of the same facts.
 
I find it suspicious how quickly Mandatory went from a springy, sprightly gait before his confinement to a debilitating gout. Puttin' on a pity party, says I.

And about his age. Who frikkin' cares? Are we supposed to be so observant of what time remains of a criminal's miserable existence to greatly diminish his punishment? As I've pointed out previously, having lived for many younger and vital years off his illl gotten gains, Manafort should endure the same justice whatever his age. Otherwise society would essentially be telling the guilty to just avoid getting caught until into dotage, and thereby largely escape the worst of the Law's redress.

Why, I'll bet he'll be out quite soon on grounds of 'medical' issues. His backup against a pardon not coming...
 

...

Graham pointed to controversies surrounding a surveillance warrant on Trump aide Carter Page and text messages by two FBI employees that were critical of President Donald Trump.

**** you, Graham. Those "controversies" that are equivalent to the "controversy" being pushed by cdesign proponentsists in both honesty and purpose deserve no more time on the public stage.
 
Last December, Aleksej Gubarev's defamation lawsuit against Buzzfeed for publishing the Steele dossier was dismissed. The dossier said Gubarev's XBT company had been involved in the hacking of Democratic Party officials and in running social media bots. The judge dismissed the suit because he ruled that the publication of the dossier had a "fair reporting privilege," regardless of the accuracy of the claim. However, Rachel Maddow had a segment last night about the unsealing of court documents, and apparently a private investigation during discovery turned up proof that XBT servers had been involved in the phishing scams and the bots. So far, several items in the dossier have been confirmed, and none have been conclusively disproved (the closest being Cohen's denial of meeting Russians in Prague).
 
Last edited:
Trump Tweeted

“New evidence that the Obama era team of the FBI, DOJ & CIA were working together to Spy on (and take out) President Trump, all the way back in 2015.” A transcript of Peter Strzok’s testimony is devastating. Hopefully the Mueller Report will be covering this. @OANN @foxandfriends
 
Trump Tweeted

“New evidence that the Obama era team of the FBI, DOJ & CIA were working together to Spy on (and take out) President Trump, all the way back in 2015.” A transcript of Peter Strzok’s testimony is devastating. Hopefully the Mueller Report will be covering this. @OANN @foxandfriends

The idea that Peter Stzok's testimony is devastating is beyond absurd if you read it in its entirety. In fact, what it shows is a hard working dedicated FBI agent doing his job properly.
 
Trump Tweets

So, if there was knowingly & acknowledged to be “zero” crime when the Special Counsel was appointed, and if the appointment was made based on the Fake Dossier (paid for by Crooked Hillary) and now disgraced Andrew McCabe (he & all stated no crime), then the Special Counsel.......

....should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report. This was an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime. Russian Collusion was nothing more than an excuse by the Democrats for losing an Election that they thought they were going to win.....

.....THIS SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN TO A PRESIDENT AGAIN!
 
Trump Tweets

So, if there was knowingly & acknowledged to be “zero” crime when the Special Counsel was appointed, and if the appointment was made based on the Fake Dossier (paid for by Crooked Hillary) and now disgraced Andrew McCabe (he & all stated no crime), then the Special Counsel.......

....should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report. This was an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime. Russian Collusion was nothing more than an excuse by the Democrats for losing an Election that they thought they were going to win.....

.....THIS SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN TO A PRESIDENT AGAIN!

Some days I think "Maybe the Mueller report won't contain anything more damming on Trump than what we already know".

But then these constant, ranting tweets keep coming. I have a hard time seeing any plausible reason for them other than that Trump is well aware the report will reveal serious crimes by him and his family and he wants to get ahead of it.

If Mueller has nothing to reveal, why on earth would he get so unhinged?
 
Some days I think "Maybe the Mueller report won't contain anything more damming on Trump than what we already know".

But then these constant, ranting tweets keep coming. I have a hard time seeing any plausible reason for them other than that Trump is well aware the report will reveal serious crimes by him and his family and he wants to get ahead of it.

If Mueller has nothing to reveal, why on earth would he get so unhinged?

Because Trump is always vicious to all his opponents. Look at the stuff he said about Ted Cruz during the primaries. You're expecting some sort of proportionality to his response, but history doesn't give justification for that assumption.
 
Because Trump is always vicious to all his opponents. Look at the stuff he said about Ted Cruz during the primaries. You're expecting some sort of proportionality to his response, but history doesn't give justification for that assumption.

But Mueller isn't an opponent. He's not a politician. He's law enforcement. He is only an opponent if Trump believes he will uncover something serious Trump is hiding. Otherwise Trump could just as easily say that the report will exonerate him.
 
But Mueller isn't an opponent. He's not a politician. He's law enforcement. He is only an opponent if Trump believes he will uncover something serious Trump is hiding. Otherwise Trump could just as easily say that the report will exonerate him.

Mueller has already caused problems for Trump, even if the rest of the investigation exonerates him. That suffices to make him an opponent for Trump. And Trump attacks all his opponents. You're trying to analyze this as if Trump were a normal politician, but he isn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom