Scorpion
Illuminator
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 3,829
My point was that the title of the book and Dennet's use of the word theory in the preface of it are not, by definition, contradictory, as Scorpion seems to believe.
I have done a little more work on my bit of a page. I have to repost the whole thing as its too late to edit the above.
Page two of my book.
Psychology might be said to be less than a science, because it deals with consciousness which is not understood. At this time nobody knows how we are conscious, unless you take the title of Daniel Dennett's book 'consciousness explained' as literal. But in fact Dennett says in line six of the preface that his ideas are only a theory. He says "I think I can sketch an outline of the solution, a theory of consciousness that gives answers [or shows how to find the answers]". Here Dennett is clearly saying he does not yet think he has the answers.
He dismissed Descartes dualism theory that the mind is separate from the body in a couple of sentences, as not being worthy of further consideration. Therefore I feel equally dismissive of Dennett's book and it can be ignored, because it was his hubris made him claim false status for what is nothing but another failed theory. There are other new theories of mind that also fail to truly explain consciousness. I maintain that Descartes dualism is in fact the truth, and mind is different in its nature to the matter of the brain. Thought is nebulous and non physical whereas the brain is made of matter that resembles porridge. If thought was caused by chemical and electrical actions I do not believe we would have the mental capacity to think freely, and therefore not be able to consider such concepts. The Descartes concept is we are 'the ghost in the machine', although Descartes did not invent the phrase, it was coined by a twentieth century critic of his work.
Dennett has his critics like David Chalmers and Thomas Nagel who have said he simply ignores the subjective aspect of consciousness. With the result his book has been nicknamed 'consciousness explained away'
Last edited: