Official - Michael Jackson was scum

[Pterodactyl]

What evidence would you expect to see, that you haven't?

Forensic evidence, rape kit, confession, pedo porn, the usual stuff.

Again, I'm not saying he didn't do this stuff, I just think that an individual like Jackson has special propensity to be a mark for false accusation considering his unique combination of wealth and eccentric, childlike behavior.

Probably a pedo in some capacity, just haven't seen anything like a smoking gun. I might've missed it though, which is why Im asking.

 

[William Parcher]

I'm not certain, but I seem to recall that at least one boy was able to describe Jackson's Johnson in a way that could only be done if he had actually seen it up close.

 

[Pterodactyl]

I'm not certain, but I seem to recall that at least one boy was able to describe Jackson's Johnson in a way that could only be done if he had actually seen it up close.

Was it smoking though?

Heh. I seem to recall something similar now that you mention it. If true, that significantly increases the likelihood of these accusations being true, IMO.

 

[wasapi]

Yes. One boy described a - uniqueness - about Jackson's penis.

 

[alfaniner]

Yes. One boy described a - uniqueness - about Jackson's penis.

I'd read that also. But I allow for the possibility that the investigative team could have provided leading questions generating that result.

 

[wasapi]

I'd read that also. But I allow for the possibility that the investigative team could have provided leading questions generating that result.

Perhaps. But at the time, I recall thinking of it as a smoking gun. Though one never seemed necessary. My confusion is about how obvious all of the signs were, and I over-estimated people I guess. He didn't need to hold up a sign saying 'I am a pedophile'. Apparently there are still fans who choose not to believe, and to me that's baffling.

 

[Information Analyst]

Yes. One boy described a - uniqueness - about Jackson's penis.

No, he claimed that Jackson's penis had markings consistent with his vitiligo, so could have just been a guess. He also said that Jackson was circumcised, when he wasn't.

 

[wasapi]

No, he claimed that Jackson's penis had markings consistent with his vitiligo, so could have just been a guess. He also said that Jackson was circumcised, when he wasn't.

I stand corrected! Thanks, it has been awhile and I should have checked prior to my post.

 

[William Parcher]

Here's a Google search that gives many sources on this question.

https://www.google.com/search?q=boy+described+michael+jackson's+penis&oq=boy+&aqs

 

[sadhatter]

That's just called getting older.

In reverse ,yes.

 

[qayak]

There were trials. Jackson got off two of them for technical reasons.

And by "technical reasons" you mean the jury acquitted him, right?

 

[qayak]

Getting away with it because nobody dare report the abuse out of fear for their career puts you, in effect, '"above the law".

Small town and the chief of police is up to no good and you know it. Taking bribes, intimidating people for his own gain ... that kind of thing. Are you going to report him?

That's still not what "above the law" means. The best you can say is that these people didn't come to the attention of the law. Except Jackson of course because he was acquitted at trial.

 

[Elagabalus]

And by "technical reasons" you mean the jury acquitted him, right?

He settled out of court in the first trial.

 

[Skeptical Greg]

That's still not what "above the law" means. The best you can say is that these people didn't come to the attention of the law. Except Jackson of course because he was acquitted at trial.

How do you know they did not come to the attention of the law, but were ignored by the law?


That's what " being above the law " means..

 

[qayak]

He settled out of court in the first trial.

Yeah, that's not a technicality either.

 

[qayak]

How do you know they did not come to the attention of the law, but were ignored by the law?


That's what " being above the law " means..

If you have evidence of that please provide it, it would help your argument.
There are many reasons law enforcement decide not to investigate and/or prosecute though and none of them make one "above the law." Most of them mean you haven't done anything wrong.

 

[p0lka]

If you have evidence of that please provide it, it would help your argument.
There are many reasons law enforcement decide not to investigate and/or prosecute though and none of them make one "above the law." Most of them mean you haven't done anything wrong.[/QUOTE]

Unless you're MJ, that's where the "above the law" comes in.

 

[Checkmite]

Yeah, that's not a technicality either.

It's not a jury acquittal.

And settling out of court over a criminal matter, as opposed to a civil one, is also very much an example of Jackson being "above the law". If a not rich/famous person offered their alleged sexual assault victim money to stop cooperating with a police investigation, that person would be charged with witness tampering.

 

[Skeptical Greg]

If you have evidence of that please provide it, it would help your argument.
There are many reasons law enforcement decide not to investigate and/or prosecute though and none of them make one "above the law." Most of them mean you haven't done anything wrong.

We really need and example of what " above the law ' means to you, so we can know why we are wrong.

 

[qayak]

Unless you're MJ, that's where the "above the law" comes in.

Except he was investigated and charged which means he is not above the law, he was acquitted.