Ladewig
I lost an avatar bet.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Messages
- 28,828
And yet he complains about Kaepernick:
United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 §8. Respect for flag
b. The flag should never touch anything beneath it.
Handsomely phrased.
And yet he complains about Kaepernick:
United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 §8. Respect for flag
b. The flag should never touch anything beneath it.
As written about in 2018 to little effect, Congress returns to the storied changes in the plan for the DC FBI building now that the midterm elections have happened.
Aside from Trump’s criticism of the existing design of the Hoover building, it appears that Trump changed the plan for relocating FBI headquarters.
This happened once he discovered that new competition for his existing hotel might emerge if the building were replaced with private commercial development.
Now various committees are finally getting to look at the possibility of corruption where Trump quashed a public project in order to gain private profit.
Trump took $17 million in insurance for hurricane damage to Mar-a-Lago in 2005 that few remember. The @AP looked into it in 2016 and found little evidence of damage. Trump couldn't say how much he spent on repairs; acknowledged pocketing some of the money
From the guy who called the Nazis in Charlottesville "Good People",
Physician , heal thy freaking self.
...And... Trump sons quietly fire hunting retreat caretaker after 18 years of (undocumented) service. Funny how that just keeps happening now that attention's on them.
Trump took $17 million in insurance for hurricane damage to Mar-a-Lago in 2005 that few remember. The @AP looked into it in 2016 and found little evidence of damage. Trump couldn't say how much he spent on repairs; acknowledged pocketing some of the money.
Highest rate of arrests doesn't mean highest rate of attempted crossings.
In fact I keep seeing stats saying crossings are historically low.
Manufactured "crisis."
Trump Tweets
It is shameful that House Democrats won’t take a stronger stand against Anti-Semitism in their conference. Anti-Semitism has fueled atrocities throughout history and it’s inconceivable they will not act to condemn it!
Katelynn Vogt, Price’s communications director, pointed to a January 2019 FAQ from the Congressional Research Service, an article from USA Today, and related fact-checks from The New York Times and NPR as evidence in support of the claim. "Since peaking in the year 2000, there has been a distinct downward trend in apprehensions at the southern border," she said. "While the specific number has fluctuated year-to-year, including a slight uptick for 2018, it remains at historically low levels." Link
Fox will host him, of course. But would any other candidate with scruples bother debasing themselves to appear on that same channel to debate with Trump? He will look fairly silly debating with himself...although he would inevitably lose that debate too.
This is from Congressman David Price's staff, in regard to Price's claim border apprehensions are at a record low.
.
Words not in Donny's vocabulary. I sincerely doubt he can pronounce them let alone say what they mean. So someone else authored that tweet. Who...?Mango Menace said:Senate Republicans are not voting on constitutionality or precedent...
Southwest border. They could have done the whole southern border, but they didn't, and he just says "the border," not "a specific subset of the border." Been a while since I've seen a good lie through statistics like that. I don't know what the whole chart would show, but I do know that this isn't it.
If he's referring to the Presidential Debates, then he of course has the right to not participate. That would put significant pressure on choosing a venue, I'd think.
He says general election but then mentions multiple "radical left Democrats," it's tough to tell given his vast ignorance and idiocy. He just really hates the first amendment.
No.Isn't the entire Mexico border the southwest?
It is tough to tell what he means or whether he means anything specific at all. The mention of "radical left Democrats" is just odd -- does he think he'll debate more than one of them? Is he speaking about the primaries? Who the hell knows?
Handsomely phrased.