Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony

The Big Dog said:
No Cohen isn't. I cannot even fathom where you got that from his testimony. In the whole, his testimony destroyed several claims against Trump, particularly collusion, and destroyed the Steele report.

He was nightmare for the leftists on all fronts.
Click to expand...


I actually listened to it before responding.
 
The Big Dog said:
Cool that we agree that I was correct. hands across the aisle my man!

protip: I cited that website not because I agree with everything it says, but because you agree with almost everything it says.

"The best internet argument is made when smart posters use the opponents own prejudices against them."

-Sun Tzu The Art of war
Click to expand...


Now that sounds like what WilliamSeger was speaking about!

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=12618770#post12618770
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
That is true, the fact that this guy is a fanatical, Never Trump, neo-con scum weasel does not mean he is wrong.

Which is why The Big Dog expertly dissected his claim that Cohen squandered his intergrity in service of trump, when in fact he destroyed himself and his family through sleazy bank deals and tax fraud.
Click to expand...

So it could be he's just as wrong about Republicans having any integrity to lose, huh.
 
newyorkguy said:
Your link doesn't seem to support your calling the "gutter punk" (???) pro-war. It is from five years ago, involves the Obama Administration taking military action against Syria and Wehner seems to be counseling against it.


Are you really arguing that Trump is not corrupt? You see no evidence that he is a constant liar and manipulator? I understand you obviously support him, a lot, but this is exactly what Wehner was talking about: see no evil - hear no evil. There have to be certain basic standards that any leader is held to.
Click to expand...

This is the problem you can have when you link to something you THINK will support your argument, without first READING what it says.

Oops (again) TBD!
 
The Big Dog said:
Folks, from the article:

"Neocon Peter Wehner is a bit wobbly from the extremely strong anti-war sentiment of the American public.....
Wehner feels that if Obama attacks Syria despite Congress, and things go badly as a result, it will only strengthen the non-interventionists....

He then warns his fellow neocon destroyers-in-arms:

"Those who favor an active role by America in the world–hawks who have spent their lives rightly resisting the “America Come Home” siren call–need to be wise in their counsel. Because if the next military engagement isn’t well thought out, well executed, and doesn’t lead to a relatively swift and decent outcome, the blowback could be intense."

Typical neocon, already thinking about “the next military engagement”. Any guess as to what he’s most likely talking about? Here’s a clue: The target name begins with an “I” and ends with an “N”."

Golly I wonder why the website called him pro-war? Can a brother get a laughing dog?

"hawks who have spent their lives rightly resisting the “America Come Home” siren call."

Hoo nellie
Click to expand...

smartcooky said:
This is the problem you can have when you link to something you THINK will support your argument, without first READING what it says.

Oops (again) TBD!
Click to expand...

This is the problem you can have when you link to something you THINK will support your argument, without first READING what the actual article or the thread.

Oops (again)

Love ya man, TBD!
 
The Big Dog said:
Trump did not make Mikey the mope lie to financial institutions to game the Taxi medallion system
Trump did not make Miley the rat ****** file fraudulent tax returns.
Click to expand...

WHATABOUTISM-45.jpg
 
smartcooky said:
You didn't read the article OR the thread?

Hooboy

Fantastic!
Click to expand...

Nope, good buddy, you didn't. You just took another poster's word for it, despite the fact that by the time you did so, the big dog had nuked the claim from orbit
 
WilliamSeger said:
But which planet was that?
Click to expand...

This one, planet earth, the one where Wehner admitted in the article to being a hawk, where a poster claimed that the article showed he was not, where TBD proved it again that he was a hawk, and where after I had done that, another poster repeated the same claim that TBD had destroyed.

To sum up, TBD’s planet
 
The Big Dog said:
This one, planet earth, the one where Wehner admitted in the article to being a hawk, where a poster claimed that the article showed he was not, where TBD proved it again that he was a hawk, and where after I had done that, another poster repeated the same claim that TBD had destroyed.

To sum up, TBD’s planet
Click to expand...

Well, from that high an orbit, maybe you don't realize your nukes are missing the mark: Everything Wehner says about Trump is still standing. How are you doing on oxygen?
 
WilliamSeger said:
Well, from that high an orbit, maybe you don't realize your nukes are missing the mark: Everything Wehner says about Trump is still standing. How are you doing on oxygen?
Click to expand...

Well by all means, y’all get right into bed with Mr. Wehner.

:thumbsup:

:D
 
The Big Dog said:
Well by all means, y’all get right into bed with Mr. Wehner.

:thumbsup:

:D
Click to expand...

Well, see this is two good examples of your simplistic political views: Wehner is a "bit wobbly" on being anti-war so you label him pro-war; and all us anti-trumpers are having sex with each other.
 
WilliamSeger said:
Well, see this is two good examples of your simplistic political views: Wehner is a "bit wobbly" on being anti-war so you label him pro-war; and all us anti-trumpers are having sex with each other.
Click to expand...

Be honest, it wouldn't make any difference.

Even if Wehner wasn't "a bit wobbly" on some topic or another, TBD would just spin something Wehner did or said into whatever he needs to fit he and Dear Leader's narrative.
 
WilliamSeger said:
Well, see this is two good examples of your simplistic political views: Wehner is a "bit wobbly" on being anti-war so you label him pro-war; and all us anti-trumpers are having sex with each other.
Click to expand...

:eek:
:eye-poppi
:jaw-dropp

What did you just say about Wehner?????? He is not wobbly on being anti-war, he is wobbly because of the extremely strong anti war sentiment of the American public!

You fellas slay me!

Oh mercy...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom