The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 29,799
If you really want to change the past, get a batch of vaccines and antibiotics and strategically apply them to royal offspring.
Or in some cases you may want to strategically apply some hedge clippers below the belt
And I don't mean for trimming the bush![]()
This assumes time is not a closed loop. If it is, it doesn't matter what the time-traveler does and free will has no meaning.
Now I've made myself depressed.
The central theme of the novel is time travel using a highway that links all times and all possible histories.[2] Exits from the highway lead to different times and places. Changing events in the past cause some exits further up the road, in the future, to become overgrown and inaccessible and new exits to appear, leading to different alternative futures.
The narrator and protagonist, Red Dorakeen, has vague memories of a place or time that is no longer accessible from the Road. He runs guns to the Greeks at Marathon, trying to recreate history as he remembers it in an attempt to open a new exit from the Road to his half-remembered place. The phrase "Last Exit to Babylon" was the manuscript title of the book and appears on the cover art; it was later used as a title for Volume Four in the Collected Stories of Roger Zelazny collection.[3]
So, anyway, the general consensus seems to be that if you had a time travel machine, you should go kill Hitler.
So if we have a time machine we should go back in time and protect Hitler from other time travelers?
I would totally watch a movie of that.
Seconded.
Oh yeah.
I can see it. Start the film as if it's a standard Dystopian future movie, some fascist government or a post-apocalyptic thing. Gradually you build up to the reveal that this is a result of time travelers killing Hitler, leading to a worse outcome (maybe Hans idea of a fascist western state, or perhaps a Russian-German alliance world takeover or something).
Could be good, if done well.
For my own contribution, let's imagine a scenario where Hitler dies at some point in '39. E.g., either the Michał Karaszewicz-Tokarzewski or the Georg Elser plots actually succeed.
It is? I've always thought you shouldn't mess around with the past, and also that the second world war, horrible as it was, was actually a good thing for the world in that it was so horrible that no one wanted another one and worked to make sure one didn't happen.
Why is it always "go back in time and kill baby Hitler" and not "go back in time and raise baby Hitler to not be such a dick"?
I'm gonna go kill Hitler guys. You will know it worked if the timeline changes so American drives on the right hand side of the street and Thursday comes after Wednesday.