applecorped
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 20,145
I guess words are louder than actions sometimes
This. It's outrageous that student athletes generate such vast sums and don't get a cut.
No, they don't get a cut.
They get a free college education, if they want it. Free room and board.
And more importantly they get specific job related training in their field that they can't get anywhere else, if they make it to the pros, this is probably the most valuable part of the package they get.
Quite the over-representation, especially considering that Jews are around 2% of the U.S. population (per census bureau 2012 estimate)
Maybe LeBron James talks like a raging Anti-Semite? Possibly without even knowing it?
Though, this could help explain why he perceives a "slave mentality" among these owners:
Hmm...
Perhaps he is trying to break free of the shekels that bind him in his slave-like condition?
Personally, I condemn his disgusting antisemitism in the strongest possible terms.
Going way back to the OP, I think the issue presented is the double standard for racist speech. The justification I often hear is that POC are not in a position of power and therefore cannot be racist. James does not seem to have that out. He has immense social and economic power. Does this affect his privelege to say hateful things with impunity?
James does still have that.
Has what? The right to say whatever he pleases (a given), or the privilege of doing so with societal approval?
The status of being in a position absent power such that he cannot be racist.
How are you defining racist?
Eta: or power, for that matter
In the same manner as you referred to when you cited the supposed justification. As I understand the theory, there is no exception with sufficient wealth or say.
I would see him in a position of superior power over most of the planet, so I'm not sure how he can claim powerlessness by being black
Because the social science you are citing doesn't make an exception.
I don't care what exception the social science includes. It may be reasonable, or not. Hence the question on a skeptical discussion forum to consider it
Then I don't the no either of us have the requisite knowledge of social sciences to make that judgement if it is accurate or not.
You're doing it again, aren't you?
Going way back to the OP, I think the issue presented is the double standard for racist speech.
Ok. Social science is not a forum member. SS is not being asked to opine. Would you consider James to be immune to accusations of racism based on being black?
I have no opinion on that.