Status
Not open for further replies.
I think documents made clear that Individual 1 went on to be President, which kind of limits the field of suspects!

True - although I (and I might be misremembering) I thought that needed a very small deductive leap for that.

Regardless, it was a presidential campaign run with the Trump Organisation.
 
Trump Tweets

The Mueller Angry Democrats recently deleted approximately 19,000 Text messages between FBI Agent Lisa Page and her lover, Agent Peter S. These Texts were asked for and INVALUABLE to the truth of the Witch Hunt Hoax. This is a total Obstruction of Justice. All Texts Demanded!
 
Trump Tweets

The Mueller Angry Democrats recently deleted approximately 19,000 Text messages between FBI Agent Lisa Page and her lover, Agent Peter S. These Texts were asked for and INVALUABLE to the truth of the Witch Hunt Hoax. This is a total Obstruction of Justice. All Texts Demanded!

What a dumbass.
 
Trump Tweets

The Mueller Angry Democrats recently deleted approximately 19,000 Text messages between FBI Agent Lisa Page and her lover, Agent Peter S. These Texts were asked for and INVALUABLE to the truth of the Witch Hunt Hoax. This is a total Obstruction of Justice. All Texts Demanded!
Okay, that one's all him.
 
Seconded. As anxious as I am to find out what Mueller has (and I know he has something), I'd rather they wait until they have it all wrapped up in pretty paper with a bow on it for Trump to unwrap. I'll be Christmas for me.

Do you have inside information on the Mueller investigation, or is that more of an opinion based on evidence publicly available?

I certainly hope Mueller has something on Trump - he deserves to be behind bars for a lot of things (IMO) - but I'm sceptical that he has anything specific on Trump himself. Trump has, so far, not tried to shut down the investigation although he has tried to discredit it. To me that says Mueller has stuff that is potentially damaging, but not stuff that would put Trump in jail.

The above is all speculation but then, so is this whole thread.

Unless you think I'm part of the Mueller investigation, Rod Rosenstein, or Matt Whittaker, I think it's pretty apparent that it's my opinion.
 
Do you have inside information on the Mueller investigation, or is that more of an opinion based on evidence publicly available?
What blocked number did Jr call during the Trump Tower meeting? The FBI can find out who the number belongs to. We know Trump has a flimsy excuse for having written Jr's excuse following the meeting.

...- but I'm sceptical that he has anything specific on Trump himself. Trump has, so far, not tried to shut down the investigation although he has tried to discredit it. To me that says Mueller has stuff that is potentially damaging, but not stuff that would put Trump in jail.

The above is all speculation but then, so is this whole thread.
No it is not. But for people ignoring the evidence that is in the public domain including more than 30 indictments and numerous convictions in their minds I suppose it seems like all speculation.

As for Trump trying to shut the investigation down, on this I will speculate: Some powerful Republicans like McConnell have told him shutting the investigation down would be disastrous. Of course who knows what McConnell thinks about there being or not being evidence. There are a number of possibilities how such a warning might be offered and taken.
 
Last edited:
Trump Tweets

The Mueller Angry Democrats recently deleted approximately 19,000 Text messages between FBI Agent Lisa Page and her lover, Agent Peter S. These Texts were asked for and INVALUABLE to the truth of the Witch Hunt Hoax. This is a total Obstruction of Justice. All Texts Demanded!

Okay, that one's all him.

Was it the unnecessary/incorrect caps or the use of "lover" that gave it away?
 
Was it the unnecessary/incorrect caps or the use of "lover" that gave it away?
He had me at "The Mueller Angry Democrats." His ghostwriter is way more presidential than he is, and (so far) hasn't started incorporating his obviously false ad hominems.
 
In that case, I think it is Stacyhs's opinion that, based on publicly available knowledge, it is very likely that Mueller has stuff on Trump. Which is basically what he/she said.

And my opinion that he/she is correct.

The revelations should be fun, but not unexpected.

Thank you for asking.
 
Was it the unnecessary/incorrect caps or the use of "lover" that gave it away?

He had me at "The Mueller Angry Democrats." His ghostwriter is way more presidential than he is, and (so far) hasn't started incorporating his obviously false ad hominems.


All of that, and I figure he wrote out Lisa Page's full name but only wrote "Peter S." either because he couldn't spell "Strzok" or couldn't remember it, and didn't know how to look it up on Google.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom