Paul2
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2004
- Messages
- 8,553
Because then the GOP would can the whole thing and respond to any further accusations with "Mueller did a 'full investigation' and didn't find anything!"
I think I’ve heard that before . . . .
Because then the GOP would can the whole thing and respond to any further accusations with "Mueller did a 'full investigation' and didn't find anything!"
Chief Justice John Roberts on Sunday issued a temporary pause on an order holding an unnamed, foreign government-owned company in contempt over a mystery court case related to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
The order puts on hold the contempt citation issued by a DC federal judge against the company related to a grand jury subpoena it received, but only long enough for the justices to decide whether they want to intervene in the case.
The company asked the Supreme Court to intervene after a federal appeals court ruling that ordered the company to comply with the subpoena, which required it to turn over "information" about its commercial activity in a criminal investigation. The Supreme Court action also paused fines the company was facing for every day of noncompliance.
The pause lasts until the court has time to review a response from the government due on or before December 31.
I wonder if Trump thinks he's shutting down Mueller's investigation with the government shutdown?
I wonder if Trump thinks he's shutting down Mueller's investigation with the government shutdown?
Well if he does, then he's a fool.

Because then the GOP would can the whole thing and respond to any further accusations with "Mueller did a 'full investigation' and didn't find anything!"
We already know that is the case.
True. Good point. But I do think that something is going to come out about Deutsche Bank and Trump.
The giant German lender was hit with about $630 million in penalties on Tuesday over a $10 billion Russian money-laundering scheme that involved its Moscow, New York and London branches...The latest fines penalize Deutsche Bank (DB)'s failure to deal with a stock-trading scheme that enabled some of its clients in Russia to improperly move huge sums of money out of the country and into offshore accounts, according to regulators. Link
Can we please start a pool on who is company A from country A?
I'll take VTB Bank (Russian-owned). Oleg Deripaska is trying to at least appear to divest from Rusal (Russian Aluminium) to try and evade sanctions and keep the company able to do business in the USA. VTB had loaned him a billion or so in 2017. Maybe Deripaska got a heads-up about sanctions from Flynn or Manifort as part of the Trump transition, which is why he was trying to get out ahead of the story with lobbying and appointing a new CEO. Manifort and Gates had worked for him before.
ETA - It's behind a paywall, but here's a great article at NYT. I think that you can read so many articles for free per month.
Two Capitals, One Russian Oligarch: How Oleg Deripaska Is Trying to Escape U.S. Sanctions
Rusal would have been my first guess, but they're not government-owned.
Yeah, but the Trump administration bumped the fine down to $200 million.
Trump, his minions and his blindly loyal and devoted disciples, have often claimed that The Steele Dossier is a completely made-up "fake document", that none of the information in it is true. Trump has constantly lied about how much was paid for it (figures he has used have ranged from $4m to $12.4m)...Well it seems that the dossier is in fact a very accurate document...
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
[T]he Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing email messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the Wikileaks platform. The reason for using Wikileaks was "plausible deniability" and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team. Link
Interesting link to an interesting website.
One quote from the dossier, contained in the linked news article, caught my eye.
[T]he Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing email messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the Wikileaks platform. The reason for using Wikileaks was "plausible deniability" and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team. Link
Sounds like Watergate all over again.