Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
Some say they know Q is a hoax. Some disagree. I think that this cannot be known, yet.

I'm still on the fence hence I apply the term 'pseudoskeptic' to those saying they know Q is a hoax. The more confidently they sling it around the room, the less they seem a skeptic, to me.

Knowing what is knowable is of course the question.


Where those showing a predisposed (political) notion, such as (in this thread) disparaging the right and alt-right indicate defense of a preconceived ideological position, they get extra pseudoskeptic red flags IMO.
Click to expand...

Then show those horrid pseudoskeptics how it's done. Check it for yourself.
Have you contacted NBC yet?
 
Bubba said:
Some say they know Q is a hoax. Some disagree. I think that this cannot be known, yet.

I'm still on the fence hence I apply the term 'pseudoskeptic' to those saying they know Q is a hoax. The more confidently they sling it around the room, the less they seem a skeptic, to me.

Knowing what is knowable is of course the question.


Where those showing a predisposed (political) notion, such as (in this thread) disparaging the right and alt-right indicate defense of a preconceived ideological position, they get extra pseudoskeptic red flags IMO.
Click to expand...


It's Russel's teapot. Q's authenticity is a totally unverifiable claim. Asserted without evidence, or even the chance of collecting evidence, it can be dismissed without evidence.
 
Bubba said:
Some say they know Q is a hoax. Some disagree. I think that this cannot be known, yet.

I'm still on the fence hence I apply the term 'pseudoskeptic' to those saying they know Q is a hoax. The more confidently they sling it around the room, the less they seem a skeptic, to me.

Knowing what is knowable is of course the question.

Where those showing a predisposed (political) notion, such as (in this thread) disparaging the right and alt-right indicate defense of a preconceived ideological position, they get extra pseudoskeptic red flags IMO.
Click to expand...

Bubba, you’re not fooling anyone. At all. You’d get more respect if you simply owned your investment in “Q” claims, rather than this utterly transparent JAQing morality play of yours. Even the thread participants who are unfamiliar with your many previous iterations of the same script see through you.

I have to admit, though, your scolding of other people for their political biases is pretty funny. It’s not really a new plot element, of course, but it’s a nice variation on one of your favorite cliches.
 
sts60 said:
Bubba, you’re not fooling anyone. At all. You’d get more respect if you simply owned your investment in “Q” claims, rather than this utterly transparent JAQing morality play of yours. Even the thread participants who are unfamiliar with your many previous iterations of the same script see through you.

I have to admit, though, your scolding of other people for their political biases is pretty funny. It’s not really a new plot element, of course, but it’s a nice variation on one of your favorite cliches.
Click to expand...



Already did.

I'll say it again. Just for Jets.

I know this Q business could be a hoax, and I hope it is not a hoax.
Click to expand...
 
If in fact one cannot know whether or not Q is a hoax, then I would suggest the skeptical viewpoint is that it is thus impossible to know without information from some other source whether or not anything Q says is true, and the only rational action is to base one's judgment only on other sources, since Q is functionally worthless whether true or false.

I do not know what a "pseudoskeptic" is in its usual usage as a construction of credulous right-wingers, but I would suggest that a pseudoskeptic is likely the opposite of that - a person who believes that the very lack of verifiability entitles even the most nonsensical ideas to serious consideration.
 
Posted by sts60 View Post


if you simply owned your investment in “Q” claims,
Click to expand...



Better yet, if you compose my confession as you deem it should sound, in your words, to your complete satisfaction, I will sign it if it is accurate.
 
Confirmation bias as determining factor and we're the "pseudoskeptics?"

My prediction is that Commandante Boor-O will be saying "good morning" to a judge before any of the individuals in the imaginary indictments will.
 
bruto said:
If in fact one cannot know whether or not Q is a hoax, then I would suggest the skeptical viewpoint is that it is thus impossible to know without information from some other source whether or not anything Q says is true, and the only rational action is to base one's judgment only on other sources, since Q is functionally worthless whether true or false.

I do not know what a "pseudoskeptic" is in its usual usage as a construction of credulous right-wingers, but I would suggest that a pseudoskeptic is likely the opposite of that - a person who believes that the very lack of verifiability entitles even the most nonsensical ideas to serious consideration.
Click to expand...



There are other definitions as well.


Whats your take on Q ?

Hoax?
Real?
Cannot know ?

Are there other possible answers in addition to those three ?
 
Last edited:
bruto said:
If in fact one cannot know whether or not Q is a hoax, then I would suggest the skeptical viewpoint is that it is thus impossible to know without information from some other source whether or not anything Q says is true, and the only rational action is to base one's judgment only on other sources, since Q is functionally worthless whether true or false.
Click to expand...


Agreed.

Among 'other sources'.......

How to know which of 'other sources' are opinion vs fact ?
How to know which can be known to be who they say they are?

Either of those two questions can be tricky.


Q followers seek so called "proofs" of Q authenticity, often around the letter Q being the 17th in the alphabet. Like 17 seconds between posts/tweets made by Q and Trump on a singe topic, sometimes matching words or a matching typo 17 seconds apart (a general example).

They measure Q authenticity in terms of how they can link Q to Trump since they believe Q either is;

* a person or a team working with Trump,

* or Trump himself (maybe with someone taking dictation?)



Lets ask the (now troubled) google for a list of Q proofs:
Search term:
list "proofs" of Q authenticity.

Well my goodness...apparently that number 17 thing is just one of many other types of so called 'proofs'.



Here are #1 and #2 search results...looks like a lot. I haven't read them.


#QANON PROOFS | Archive of Q Proofs, Maps and Graphics
https://qanonproofs.com/

This website serves to archive the best proofs and graphics to establish the authenticity of #QANON. Should the Lights Go Out – We Are In Control – Q Proof.
Click to expand...


What if #Q, #QAnon and #TheGreatAwakening are Real? - Heroes ...
https://www.heroesmediagroup.com/what-if-q-qanon-and-thegreatawakening-are-real/

Jul 28, 2018 - Pub , a site that lists every single “data dump” that Q has posted since ... Qmap.pub , check out this “Q Proofs” video by Praying Medic on YouTube (the same .... but they've never come out to say the emails were not authentic.
Click to expand...


Surely some will be sillier than others. All are coincidences. This will be fun.
 
Last edited:
Finally!
Incontrovertible proof that Q is for real:



Earth is Not Flat
2622
Q
!!
Anonymous
12 Dec 2018 - 2:10:19 PM
>>4281410
Just to shut the Flat Earthers up Q,
Is the Earth flat?
Click to expand...
>>4281479
No.
Q
Click to expand...


Kidding aside....

Several posts dated 12 Dec addressed some interesting topics...sorta like a Q&A session. Much less cryptic than those which some here claim to have difficulty comprehending...Go weigh them for yourselves...


https://qmap.pub/
 
By the way.....


Originally Posted by Axxman300 View Post
Nobody cares what the free-range mentally ill are posting online.

It is now December 11. Where are all of those indictments that were supposed to drain the swamp last week?
Click to expand...


Not even close.


posted by cosmic yak

Posted by Bubba View Post
Ooopsie


Who else incorrectly assumed the meaning of Q's D5?
Click to expand...

Just the people you've been quoting in your posts.
The ones Axxman300 was talking about.
Other than that, absolutely no-one, because no-one cares what the idiots you keep quoting say. They are delusional simpleton s, and not worth the effort.
Click to expand...


:dl:


BStrong said:
Posted by Bubba View Post
Someone is thinking, at least.


Thats a very good guess....Makes sense. Try again. Its fairly common, and most appropriate in Q's game.


Q's coding does encourage thinking.
Click to expand...

My bet is that it's a reference to this:

https://www.cat.com/en_US/products/n...000001276.html

At least that's what comes to mind for me when the term "D5" is mentioned.
Click to expand...


Thinking, anyway.

Years ago a friend let me drive his D9 on old lava, ripping it up for homesites, with the one tooth claw in back. Awesome power.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The D5 thing was not Dec 5.

D5 referred to a chess move.

At that time Trump was 'playing chess' with some deep state parties.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
D5 referred to a chess move.

At that time Trump was 'playing chess' with some deep state parties.
Click to expand...

So which piece moved to D5? Normally it would be indicated, unless perhaps it was the only piece capable of moving there.
 
Bubba said:
snipped associated nonsense

The D5 thing was not Dec 5.

D5 referred to a chess move.

At that time Trump was 'playing chess' with some deep state parties.
Click to expand...

The D5 is a reference to the mechanical device needed to move the pile of ******** this character has created.

I doubt the Commandante knows how to play checkers, let alone chess.
 
BStrong said:
The D5 is a reference to the mechanical device needed to move the pile of ******** this character has created.

I doubt the Commandante knows how to play checkers, let alone chess.
Click to expand...

You forget, he's the smartest person anywhere. Just ask him. He knows how to play chess, he just plays with his gut. He always takes their Pointy guy with his Horsie. And then gets a chance to spin the wheel to start the Mouse Trap.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom