I am not wrong ... at least to the extent that there is a phenomenon called the spiritual world. While hey, there may in fact be a way of reproducing some of these things, but I can assure you, it's not going to happen (any time soon) by you having me submit to a full proctol examination in front of everyone.
Everything that we experience about reality is due to the "signals" that the brain receives. We do not in fact know anything outside of this phenomenon, which is called "consciousness."
And perhaps you should desist from all your "blind" assertions? Because it comes across as a big "zilch" in my book.
And perhaps you should desist from all your "blind" assertions? Because it comes across as a big zilch in my book.
That is funny, because that exactly describes how we perceive you.And perhaps you should desist from all your "blind" assertions? Because it comes across as a big "zilch" in my book.
If you pick up on my post to Mercutio, I begin with the notion that everything is "predescribed," that in fact it was "set up" beforehand. So basically you have the same effect, the appearance of change, just that you acknowledge it was "guided," rather than have everything come about by random (with no apparent means).
Which is to say, you really have no grounds for discussing this with me. Because I can assure you, I'm not going to show you my sphincter ... at least not on our first date anyway!
Which is to say, you really have no grounds for discussing this with me. Because I can assure you, I'm not going to show you my sphincter ... at least not on our first date anyway!
Which is to say, you really have no grounds for discussing this with me. Because I can assure you, I'm not going to show you my sphincter ... at least not on our first date anyway!
So, will tomorrow unfold any differently than the way tomorrow unfolds? Yet is it not wholly contingent upon what happens today? So, where are the "missing ingredients" that tell us tomorrow should unfold any differently? The fact is, it's all here, today, "prior" to what happens tomorrow. Now please don't bother trying to explain how what I'm saying here is "illogical." Okay?
About all I can say, is at least one us knows what we're talking about.
About all I can say, is at least one us knows what we're talking about.
Well, about all I can say is, at least one us knows what we're talking about.
I'm saying that nothing new happens tomorrow -- which, in fact is all tomorrow is, something "new"
--which is not a direct result of what happened today.
And there's a difference between believing in something in "blindly," and actually standing witness to something. And if it was just a one shot deal, for example, if I saw a hit and run accident, and there was no way of tracking the driver down, it still doesn't change the fact that somebody was injured and their life was affected as result. Now, for you to ask me to reproduce the whole thing as I if were the one responsible for the accident (albeit I may have been the one who got hit by the car), what do you expect? I am not a magician, and I don't pull rabbits out of my hat just to satisfy somebody else's whim. I'm afraid it doesn't work that way.