Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

[The Norseman]

lol. Thanks.

First observation is that a "Quarterly" report of interest to investors and the general public would be balance sheets and income statements. This is more like a propaganda screed not distant from Scientology and Hubbard.

It is fantastic as a source of bunkum, very complicated superficially and yet sleek in design for something that will move earth's orbit closer to the sun.

Plus it now looks as if Mills is officially tying his BS to dark matter which will be somewhat interesting to see it play out over the next few years (unless he hopefully goes to jail for fraud).

 

[markie]

2 things.

Firstly, how is deforming a circle into a sphere a product of "nature seek[ing] the low energy state"?

If a ball with a certain charge is brought near a thin light sheet with the opposite charge, the sheet will wrap around the ball. Static cling. Why does it do this? In order to achieve an energy minimum. 'Force' is the means to achieving this energy minimum.

Secondly, if "nature seeks the low energy state", then why is it so hard to start the production of hydrinos? Why aren't they more common than hydrogen atoms?

Given that hydrinos comprise most of what is called dark matter, hydrinos are much more common than normal hydrogen. If in outer space three hydrogen atoms collide near simultaneously, hydrino can form, and hydrino in turn can catalyze more hydrino formation. Given enough time, hydrino will accumulate in space, while space fills with the resultant UV and eUV light. This high energy light then ends up ionizing ordinary hydrogen in space. So one is left with anomalous amounts of both ionized hydrogen and UV in outer space, and there are not enough conventional sources to explain it.


From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...e-has-all-the-light-in-the-universe-gone.html

But, according to a new study in Astrophysical Journal Letters, the hydrogen tendrils suggest there is far more ultraviolet light around than is being emitted by galaxies and quasars.
An astonishing five times too much, in fact, and it is leading astrophysicists to speculate that the photons could be coming from an "exotic new source", or even decaying dark matter.
It means that 80 per cent of light in the universe is effectively missing.
...
“You know it’s a crisis when you start seriously talking about decaying dark matter,” Katz added.
“The great thing about a 400 per cent discrepancy is that you know something is really wrong,” said co-author David Weinberg of the Ohio State University.
“We still don’t know for sure what it is, but at least one thing we thought we knew about the present day universe isn’t true.”

 

[The Norseman]

Given that hydrinos comprise most of what is called dark matter...

hahahahahaha!!

 

[Darat]

I see this is a thread for science fiction and fantasy speculations wonder if anyone can help out.

With unicorns are the genes responsible for the horn dominate or recessive? If we examine the DNA of horses could we find the horn gene?

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

If a ball with a certain charge is brought near a thin light sheet with the opposite charge, the sheet will wrap around the ball. Static cling. Why does it do this? In order to achieve an energy minimum. 'Force' is the means to achieving this energy minimum.

It won't stretch and shrink to become a sphere, though. You do know it's physically impossible to flatten a sphere, don't you? The same applies to making a sphere out of something flat. It can't be done without deformation.

It also doesn't become a shell surrounding the ball.

Given that hydrinos comprise most of what is called dark matter, hydrinos are much more common than normal hydrogen.

There's still way too much hydrogen, and it's far too difficult to create hydrinos, if what Mills is claiming is true.

Oh, and can you explain what evidence there is that dark matter is made from hydrinos? I've seen it claimed a lot, but I've never once seen on what evidence it's based, other than Mills' assertion.

 

[markie]

I see this is a thread for science fiction and fantasy speculations wonder if anyone can help out.

With unicorns are the genes responsible for the horn dominate or recessive? If we examine the DNA of horses could we find the horn gene?

One suggestion for help. Let's face it ; the unicorn is elusive and almost impossible to find. But when the unicorn poop hits the fan and some gets splattered on certain faces, samples obtained thereon could always always be sent in for DNA analysis.

 

[markie]

It won't stretch and shrink to become a sphere, though. You do know it's physically impossible to flatten a sphere, don't you? The same applies to making a sphere out of something flat. It can't be done without deformation.

It also doesn't become a shell surrounding the ball.

Use your imagination. A flat soap bubble is stretched across a circular loop. You blow on it, and what do you know, it forms a bubble. Why? It is a low energy configuration.

There's still way too much hydrogen, and it's far too difficult to create hydrinos, if what Mills is claiming is true.

Oh, and can you explain what evidence there is that dark matter is made from hydrinos? I've seen it claimed a lot, but I've never once seen on what evidence it's based, other than Mills' assertion.

Hey maybe the reason that 'only' about ninety percent of all the hydrogen has not already been converted to hydrino - after even billions of years - is that it is difficult to form.

 

[Myriad]

One suggestion for help. Let's face it ; the unicorn is elusive and almost impossible to find. But when the unicorn poop hits the fan and some gets splattered on certain faces, samples obtained thereon could always always be sent in for DNA analysis.

That would be a shame, though. Because unicorn poop cures acne, prevents identity theft, removes stubborn stains, jump-starts stalled vehicles, counteracts global climate change, recharges your smart phone, repels termites, waterproofs your shoes, and lowers bad cholesterol. Not as amazing as hydrino, but you still wouldn't want to waste any.

 

[Darat]

That would be a shame, though. Because unicorn poop cures acne, prevents identity theft, removes stubborn stains, jump-starts stalled vehicles, counteracts global climate change, recharges your smart phone, repels termites, waterproofs your shoes, and lowers bad cholesterol. Not as amazing as hydrino, but you still wouldn't want to waste any.

Also it's anti-gravity so it would just float away

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Use your imagination. A flat soap bubble is stretched across a circular loop. You blow on it, and what do you know, it forms a bubble. Why? It is a low energy configuration.

Why? Because it has a force acting on the outside of it, and opposite forces acting on the edges. It's not comparable.

Hey maybe the reason that 'only' about ninety percent of all the hydrogen has not already been converted to hydrino - after even billions of years - is that it is difficult to form.

But how does it being difficult to form make sense, if "nature seeks the low energy state"?

 

[The Man]

It won't stretch and shrink to become a sphere, though. You do know it's physically impossible to flatten a sphere, don't you? The same applies to making a sphere out of something flat. It can't be done without deformation.

As far as I recall it can't be done with just deformation (Homeomorphism) either. Cutting and splicing would be required.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeomorphism


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold

For example, the surface of the sphere is not homeomorphic to the Euclidean plane, because (among other properties) it has the global topological property of compactness that Euclidean space lacks, but in a region it can be charted by means of map projections of the region into the Euclidean plane (in the context of manifolds they are called charts). When a region appears in two neighbouring charts, the two representations do not coincide exactly and a transformation is needed to pass from one to the other, called a transition map.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Here is slow-motion footage of bubbles being blown:



markie, is this what you're claiming the physics of electrons forming a shell around a nucleus to be?

 

[The Man]

Use your imagination. A flat soap bubble is stretched across a circular loop. You blow on it, and what do you know, it forms a bubble. Why? It is a low energy configuration.

Blowing on it would be doing work to it, whether the end state was of lower energy or not.

Hey maybe the reason that 'only' about ninety percent of all the hydrogen has not already been converted to hydrino - after even billions of years - is that it is difficult to form.

Or just impossible to form.

Form your previous post "three hydrogen atoms collide near simultaneously, hydrino can form", it don't sound all that hard.

 

[jsfisher]

Is markie still alleging the electron forms a solid ring (or sphere) around the nucleus? He's still got that pesky problem with the stability of a ring or sphere's orbit, but since facts never hindered Mills, markie shouldn't feel dissuaded, either.

 

[markie]

Also it's anti-gravity so it would just float away

Dihydrino gas does not have anti gravity properties. It would have the same buoyancy as normal hydrogen gas and escape into space.

 

[markie]

Why? Because it has a force acting on the outside of it, and opposite forces acting on the edges. It's not comparable.



But how does it being difficult to form make sense, if "nature seeks the low energy state"?

Thankfully nature also makes it difficult to achieve low energy states. If not, our Sun would have turned into a hydrogen bomb billions of years ago.
Similarly in chemistry one has 'activation energy' that is a barrier to exothermic reactions resulting in a lower energy state.

 

[markie]

Here is slow-motion footage of bubbles being blown:



markie, is this what you're claiming the physics of electrons forming a shell around a nucleus to be?

Huh? It's only an analogy that demonstrates the conversion of a 2D planar surface to a closed 2D surface.

 

[Red Baron Farms]

Dihydrino has does not have anti gravity properties. It would have the same buoyancy as normal hydrogen gas and escape into space.

How does dark matter have buoyancy?

 

[markie]

Blowing on it would be doing work to it, whether the end state was of lower energy or not.




Or just impossible to form.

Form your previous post "three hydrogen atoms collide near simultaneously, hydrino can form", it don't sound all that hard.

The probability drops way down going from a two body to a three body collision, especially in rarified media like outer space.

 

[markie]

Is markie still alleging the electron forms a solid ring (or sphere) around the nucleus? He's still got that pesky problem with the stability of a ring or sphere's orbit, but since facts never hindered Mills, markie shouldn't feel dissuaded, either.

No worries, the sphere membrane of precessing ring currents around the nucleus is quite stable.