CapelDodger
Penultimate Amazing
Isn't it great?Someone is peeing-in-his-pants scared.
Isn't it great?Someone is peeing-in-his-pants scared.
Trump Tweets a huge (for him) statement on the investigation.
Robert Mueller and Leakin’ Lyin’ James Comey are Best Friends, just one of many Mueller Conflicts of Interest. And bye the way, wasn’t the woman in charge of prosecuting Jerome Corsi (who I do not know) in charge of “legal” at the corrupt Clinton Foundation? A total Witch Hunt...
....Will Robert Mueller’s big time conflicts of interest be listed at the top of his Republicans only Report. Will Andrew Weissman’s horrible and vicious prosecutorial past be listed in the Report. He wrongly destroyed people’s lives, took down great companies, only to be........
.....overturned, 9-0, in the United States Supreme Court. Doing same thing to people now. Will all of the substantial & many contributions made by the 17 Angry Democrats to the Campaign of Crooked Hillary be listed in top of Report. Will the people that worked for the Clinton....
....Foundation be listed at the top of the Report? Will the scathing document written about Lyin’ James Comey, by the man in charge of the case, Rod Rosenstein (who also signed the FISA Warrant), be a big part of the Report? Isn’t Rod therefore totally conflicted? Will all of....
...the lying and leaking by the people doing the Report, & also Bruce Ohr (and his lovely wife Molly), Comey, Brennan, Clapper, & all of the many fired people of the FBI, be listed in the Report? Will the corruption within the DNC & Clinton Campaign be exposed?..And so much more!
Yes, and there's another important factor that should cause us to doubt Meadow's claim: there is no detail behind his claim. What type of evidence does he have? How did he get it?Saying there is evidence of X is of course a massive exaggeration. What there is a wild statement from a single very partisan representative. Critical thinkers and skeptics heads do not ******* explode, they merely say, 'is that all you got?' And maybe, 'provide more or move the **** on.'
Time to go back to school TBD.
I'd just like to point out that by the standards TBD is using, a single partisan claim that evidence exists of altering 302s constitutes evidence
Well, there is more evidence than a single claim, including the several statements regarding the fact that the original people who interviewed did not think he was lying, the fact that the FBI under these two mutts has admitted to modifying other 302s, etc.
Will you provide citations, please?
already did.
Trump has “repeatedly asked” if Barr would recuse himself from overseeing Mueller because he wants a “loyalist” managing the investigation, according to @nytimes.
This is corruption, pure and simple. Congress should investigate communications with Barr about the investigation.
Robert Mueller and Leakin’ Lyin’ James Comey are Best Friends, just one of many Mueller Conflicts of Interest. And bye the way, wasn’t the woman in charge of prosecuting Jerome Corsi (who I do not know) in charge of “legal” at the corrupt Clinton Foundation? A total Witch Hunt...
I realize this is the equivalent of fact-checking a Tourette’s outburst, but: Neither of these things are true.
By all accounts, Mueller & Comey had a friendly, collegial relationship at DOJ, but not much of a social relationship outside of work. They’ve had dinner together exactly twice.
Jeannie Rhee represented the Clinton Foundation in one lawsuit when she was a partner at Wilmer Hale. She was not “head of legal at the Clinton Foundation”.
The suit in question, by the way, was one of many, many frivolous lawsuits, quickly dismissed, that Larry Klayman has filed against the Clintons over the years. Rhee probably could’ve let the interns handle it.
My recollection is that the raw data that a bunch of other conclusions went beyond was that the FBI agents merely said that his physical characteristics did not indicate he was lying. Correct me if I'm wrong.Well, there is more evidence than a single claim, including the several statements regarding the fact that the original people who interviewed did not think he was lying
Do you have a citation or a link for this? This is a new one, to my memory.. . .the fact that the FBI under these two mutts has admitted to modifying other 302s, etc.
They just need to look at how he allowed Bush the greater to pardon his way out of the Iran-Contra affair.
"Also, is Andy good with F 302?"
"Fyi, have wrap at 345. Done at 430"
"Launch on f 302."
"K thank you."
So we know that Strzok and the crew monkeyed with 302s sent to Congress.
https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/978038232280481792
And even more curiously, on the very day that Flynn resigned, we see this exchange between the star crossed lovers:
Strzok is asking his gal pal to ask Andy McCabe if he approves Strzok's 302 (why, was Andy in the ******* meeting?) and Lisa page tells her sleazy **** buddy that Andy says it is a launch:
Page 5-6
What a pack of scumbos....
So we know that Strzok and the crew monkeyed with 302s sent to Congress.
https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/978038232280481792
[...]there are VERY inflammatory things in the 302s we didn't turn over to Congress[...]
I want to go read through the ones we didn't produce[...]
I will go review the 302s we didn't turn over[...]