Ladewig
I lost an avatar bet.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Messages
- 28,828
Not really. 45's a bully. He hits down, or at least in the direction that he perceives as down, because striking at a peer or superior is potentially going to get him hurt.
I cannot think of a single person that the president would consider a superior.
Exactly. He spent time at one rally making fun of G.H.W.Bush’s “Thousand points of light” which described the country being made better through volunteerism. Of course he’s going to mock it: volunteerism is beyond his comprehension.Most democratically elected leaders do what they can to maintain at least a statesman-like appearance and don't resort to childish name-calling and attempted strong-arm tactics as their first choice of how to deal with people. While 45 seems to look on it as a way to put his "opponent" off balance so he can "win" the exchange. He's the person who looks at the person not responding to the catcalls as weak, rather than as someone with the strength of character to ignore the petty stuff in order to get what needs doing done.
Contrasted with the people he sucks up to (MBS, Putin, etc) who take steps to emphasize their apparent strength all the time. Essentially, they put out the appearance that if you tangle with the bear, you're going to get mauled, and 45 believes it, because that's how he operates.
And it probably doesn't hurt that he is financially beholden to the Saudis and Russian oligarchs.
45's also incredibly shallow. His actions very clearly indicate that if something isn't "in your face" apparent, then it isn't true, because he cannot perceive what lies beneath. It's why he goes for the furnishings that would make Louis XIV go, "You should try to be less ostentatious." It's why he chose Mattis to be his SecDef, or keeps changing wives for younger and hotter models.
And he certainly doesn't get the idea of altruism - if its not to his benefit, then he doesn't care, or worse, sees it as a threat to be beaten back.
It would have taken effort to pick a worse person to be POTUS.
Indeed. He has neither the intellect, the temperament, the maturity, the breadth of knowledge, the ability to compromise, the moral compass, the critical thinking skills, or the understanding of US civics necessary to be a good president.
And I think a good case can be made that he does not have an understanding of the nature of reality. He seems to lack the ability to recognize that recording devices are able to document what he said - he often denies he said something that everyone heard. Facts that disagree with his world view are considered disinformation presented by his enemies and can be dismissed by shouting “fake news.”