Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
Q has been saying watch D5.

December 5, December 5....say many Q followers, expecting something significant coming December 5
Click to expand...

Another swift kicking of the can down the road by "Q". It's like those cults that keep declaring the end of the world and sheepishly having to move the date back after there is no hellfire.

At what point is it totally hopeless? Any hard deadline on this Q nonsense? After Trump leaves office?
 
Q is obviously concerned that his predictions will affect their outcome, hence he has to keep them vague.
Time-Traveler Code, you know?
 
Axxman300 said:
Other side note: There are, in fact professional killers, er, Fixers in Hollywood.

Hastings had a drug problem. If someone wanted to kill him he would have OD'd. That's how that would be done. (Yes, I read too much James Elroy).

How did Jack Anderson die?
Why are James Bamford, Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and Seymour Hersch still alive?

Why kill a journalist over a war NOBODY seems to care about?
Click to expand...


Oversimplification. Strawman.

Wars are known to harbor huge scams. Corrupt brass and other agents dive in for fortunes and or power.

It (Hastings) easily could've been about some scam which he was going to expose.
 
Resume said:
http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/29...-creator-q-hoax-explains-dangerous-evolution/

Quote:
From Trolling To Fleecing: Co-Creator Of ‘Q’ Hoax Explains Its Scary Evolution
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Is it true? How did you measure it for its veracity rating?


LSSBB said:
No,

Since I am a Libertarian, I am by definition not a statist.

Since I am asking you for actual evidence to back up what appears to be pure CT garbage, I am a skeptic.
Click to expand...


Could you please help fellow skeptics everywhere by providing actual evidence to back up the above federalist article, which appears to be embraced by statists.


Show how it is not written by clowns (agents) paid to discredit Q and POTUS.

(this may require your proving the chans are not monitored and infiltrated by such agents).

Please proceed, skeptic.
 
Bubba said:
Is it true? How did you measure it for its veracity rating?





Could you please help fellow skeptics everywhere by providing actual evidence to back up the above federalist article, which appears to be embraced by statists.


Show how it is not written by clowns (agents) paid to discredit Q and POTUS.

(this may require your proving the chans are not monitored and infiltrated by such agents).

Please proceed, skeptic.
Click to expand...

That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
 
carlitos said:
That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
Click to expand...

Oh poor Carlitos. Simple, feeble minded Carlitos. I shall explain it to you so you may begin to understand. All you need to know is this:

- Q exists and will soon be vindicated
- Facts that can be twisted to confirm the existence of Q are true
- Facts that disprove the existence of Q are disinformation spread by the Deep State.
- The apparent overwhelming veracity of this negative evidence is itself evidence of the competency and power of the deep state conspiracy. Behold their might!
 
"The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion." Proverbs 28

So why does Q need to hide?
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
- Facts that disprove the existence of Q are disinformation spread by the Deep State.
Click to expand...

This reminds me of a fine piece of writing on this very forum. Q supporters are validating the inflationary model of conspiracy theories.

"A Good Theory can be distinguished from a Conspiracy Theory as follows: When repeatedly exposed to scrutiny, the Conspiracy Theory requires more and more people involved, and more and more extraordinary events in order to prevent self-contradiction. A Good Theory, in contrast, remains approximately static in complexity as it is refined."
Click to expand...
 
Bubba said:
Your words. Not mine.

Why do you try put words in others' mouth ?

I said the following in post 336.
Click to expand...

Typical Bubba passive-aggressive evasiveness.

In that post, you said:

“You're asking when I will admit I was wrong about believing ... there will be arrests, right?”

Your words, although you injected some parenthetical weaseling about “hoping, actually”.

When will you admit there won’t be “arrests”? If they don’t happen by the time Trump leaves office?

When will you admit the whole Q thing is bull byproduct? Under what circumstances
 
Bubba said:
Oversimplification. Strawman.

Wars are known to harbor huge scams. Corrupt brass and other agents dive in for fortunes and or power.

It (Hastings) easily could've been about some scam which he was going to expose.
Click to expand...

1. Show me where any military officers have profited from the war in Afghanistan.

2. Tell me why the long list of stories about PRIVATE MILITARY contracting companies actually ripping off American tax payers in Afghanistan and Iraq has generated zero reaction from the American public.

3. Name one CIA officer, or one DEA agent who has made a fortune in Afghanistan.

4. Show me where anybody is winning in Afghanistan.

The truth is if we really want to hose the Taliban we'll let them have it back.

So why kill a journalist over a war that nobody cares about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom