Cont: The Trump Presidency 11: Insert something funny

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm thoroughly convinced of this. This is a perfect example why the emoluments clause is in the Constitution. Trump is clearly a captive of foreign interests. He sold out and now can be threatened by those interests. He stopped representing America and now is owned by Russia and the Saudis. There cannot be another explanation.
If he has, and it sure looks like he has, then he deliberately lied with malice aforethought taking the oath of office in 2016. Given that, how should the USA respond?
 
So, the voters of Michigan voted for Trumpenfueher because he said he would bring their jobs back. Instead they are losing more manufacturing plants.
 
I'm going to share something with you that will come as a surprise to nobody here save for an emoji pusher or two. TBD's presentation in this thread -- in virtually every thread in which s/he participates -- is 200 proof evasion, infantile neenering, and flat-out lies. This particular evasion, like most of them, is comically transparent. Yawn, another weekday at ISF I say. The only question I have -- does TBD not realize that s/he is a laughing stock?
So why do you all keep responding? If you must, at least start every response with "So, ..."
 
By sanctioning the 17 Saudis involved with the Kashoggi murder, Trump is doing exactly what MbinS did; punishing scapegoats in an effort to look like he's taking action while allowing the man who ordered the murder to go unpunished.

:eye-poppi

The people that did the actual murder are scapegoats

wowsers....
 
I'm going to share something with you that will come as a surprise to nobody here save for an emoji pusher or two. TBD's presentation in this thread -- in virtually every thread in which s/he participates -- is 200 proof evasion, infantile neenering, and flat-out lies. This particular evasion, like most of them, is comically transparent. Yawn, another weekday at ISF I say. The only question I have -- does TBD not realize that s/he is a laughing stock?

:eek:

Looks like President Trump isn't the only one who broke the Left.
 
I worked with rats in Skinner boxes as my High School Science Fair project.

When I stopped giving them Rice Crispies for pushing the bar, before long the conditioned response diminished and was eventually extinguished.

Just sayin’.


Did you do one where the rats push the bar for each other, and when they do the supply of Rice Crispies is unlimited?
 
:eek:

Looks like President Trump isn't the only one who broke the Left.

My ass.

What he did was break the Republican party. See the loss of 38 to 40 seats in the House.

The Big Dog is whistling past the grave yard. With Trump turd running the show, the party resembles the Titanic.
 
Nice pick up! Keep trawling posts for any slip you can fire a cheap shot off at. Small victories while getting spanked. :thumbsup:

spanked.... Oh dear, are the posters in this thread declaring victory? (makes note that pointing out that referring to the actual ******* murderers as "scapaegoats" is now an, ahem, "cheapshot".... hooboy...)

Seems premature, given that virtually all of them have run from the simple question that I have asked.

What do you think Trump should do?
 
Last edited:
:eye-poppi

The people that did the actual murder are scapegoats

wowsers....

Yep.

Are you so stupid that you think that a dozen operatives of the Saudi Intelligence Agency lured to Turkey and then murdered and dismembered a Washington Post reporter that has been critical of the Saudi government and the Prince on their own?

Wowser is right.

I guess Seal Team Six took it on their own to kill Osama Bin Laden and weren't ordered to do the deed by Obama. Silly me.
 
spanked.... Oh dear, are the posters in this thread declaring victory? (makes note that pointing out that referring to the actual ******* murderers as "scapaegoats" is now an, ahem, "cheapshot".... hooboy...)

Seems premature, given that virtually all of them have run from the simple question that I have asked.

What do you think Trump should do?

We told you a dozen times what we think Trump should do. For one, stop being such a pussy. Show some support of the American Intelligence Services and the Press. Demand that reparations be paid. Threaten and impose sanctions.

Stand up for the God Damn country.
 
Trump tweets:

“On the ten-year anniversary of the Mumbai terror attack, the U.S. stands with the people of India in their quest for justice. The attack killed 166 innocents, including six Americans. We will never let terrorists win, or even come close to winning!”

Thanks Mr. President
 
We told you a dozen times what we think Trump should do. For one, stop being such a pussy. Show some support of the American Intelligence Services and the Press. Demand that reparations be paid. Threaten and impose sanctions.

Stand up for the God Damn country.


Why should he do that? What's the country ever done for him?

He's dancing with the ones who brought him to the ball.
 
spanked.... Oh dear, are the posters in this thread declaring victory? (makes note that pointing out that referring to the actual ******* murderers as "scapaegoats" is now an, ahem, "cheapshot".... hooboy...)

Seems premature, given that virtually all of them have run from the simple question that I have asked.

What do you think Trump should do?

What are the odds that the designated scapegoats are the actual murderers?
Not good is my guess.
 
We told you a dozen times what we think Trump should do. For one, stop being such a pussy. Show some support of the American Intelligence Services and the Press. Demand that reparations be paid. Threaten and impose sanctions.

Stand up for the God Damn country.

He probably has everyone who responded on ignore. It's an awesome way to set up declaring victory.
 
What are the odds that the designated scapegoats are the actual murderers?
Not good is my guess.

Interesting conspiracy theory, however, the Turks have actually identified them based on their passport records.

So we are really doing this, or can we just agree that calling the actual murderers scapegoats was really silly?
 
Interesting conspiracy theory, however, the Turks have actually identified them based on their passport records.

So we are really doing this, or can we just agree that calling the actual murderers scapegoats was really silly?

I got the impression also that at least some of these apparent perpetrators are going to pay a price for failure of mission secrecy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom