RecoveringYuppy
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2006
- Messages
- 14,185
The real breakthrough will be inventing the next excuse. Any ideas markie?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3
- Thread starter Darat
- Start date
- Status
The real breakthrough will be inventing the next excuse. Any ideas markie?
At least ten minutes or just ten minutes?
Why is it limited to 10 minutes if it is a self sustaining, energy producing reaction?
One does of course have to remember Myriad's over-unity wood burning wood stove.
If we go from past experience it is finding some way of taking that heat and generating electrical power. That step has apparently stymied them in the past. Not surprising really, I mean can you imagine the technological ramifications if someone could find a way of using a heat source to generate electricity?!
jrhowell
Muse
I am trying to decide how to parse this information given that the BLP has a tendency to say one thing and mean another. My best guess at the actual meaning is:
Brilliant Light has successfully developed the technology that if proven to work when actually tested will run long duration continuous hydrino reaction power at very high power levels and power gain.
Continuous plasma: red in seconds so it does get hot when heated, status at 10 minute duration and doesn't immediately burn out. But of course that is all before we actually try to produce any hydrinos. Who knows what will happen then?
(my bold)
It's hard, Darat, really really hard.
I mean, some of the best minds over the last century or two have tried, tried, and tried again, only to fail due to a) subcontractors messing up, b) conversion efficiencies far too low to be commercially viable, c) vessels melting,
Last edited:
You are probably correct - I suspect that they are still yet to engineer out that pesky "ignition" energy.... but it's only a matter of a few (more) months to get that sorted out and then they'll be able to get into full swing of testing!
Squeegee Beckenheim
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 32,124
The question for me is why is a cube more structurally sound than a sphere?
Hellbound
Merchant of Doom
Perhaps it's a...time cube?
Mike!
Official Ponylandistanian National Treasure. Re
Last edited:
Red Baron Farms
Philosopher
wombat poo?
FYI, no it does not. Hydrogen transitioning to the hydrino state does not create a spectral line. It creates a spectral continua, analogous to what one gets when one accelerates an electrical charge. This continua appears as a hump with a certain energy cutoff which is a multiple of 27.2 eV. Also, hydrino does not revert directly to hydrogen.
The energy difference is discrete ; however the transitioning electron does not release this energy as one photon but as a collection of photons of distributed energy.
Au contraire, mon ami, au contraire!
The response has been very rational: show me the objective, quantitative, independently verified evidence.
Several - truly independent - teams tried to replicate Mills' reported results, and failed. And yes, they published their results, in relevant peer-reviewed journals.
Now you're making things up. Or maybe you're referring to the Dutch experiments on plasmas and misremembering that the results were mixed.
Because dihydrino is a smaller and more inert version of hydrogen gas of course. And yes I noticed that you didn't answer the question about the environmental impact of hydrogen gas.
If you have not penetrated how Mills can successfully calculate the ionization energies of the outer from 1 to 20 electrons in any atomic element, you are not equipped to properly judge Mills' theory. Quite relevant.Wow, talk about diversion and irrelevancy!
You say that, yet even the 1993 experiment had a university doing an analysis on the nickel tubing and finding a fingerprint that could not be explained apart from hydrino. And that is just the beginning.
You could check out this:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Publications-010118.pdf
I know of two potential flaws in two of Mills earlier experiments. The problem for pseudoskeptics is that these supposed flaws are in isolation. There are many other unaddressed aspects to the same 'flawed' experiments that confirm hydrino. In other words, pointing out particular flaw in a particular experiment provides very little weight in trying to bulldoze away a mountain of evidence.
Like JT, you are making things up. Is this a characteristic of pseudoskeptics?
How exactly is hydrogen embrittlement of metals similar to what is observed in hydrino experiments? Large anomalous heat? Continuum eUV radiation? Fast hydrogen? The necessity of particular catalysts? The detection of dihydrino and hydrino hydride? Get specific.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Delusion that an electronic transition between orbitals produces a"spectral continua"
We have an electron with a given energy in an orbital. The electron gains or loses energy and jumps to another orbital. That change in energy only depends in the difference in orbital energy. The electron emits or absorbs a photon with that energy. This gives a spectral line.
That applies even to Mills delusions. His delusion of an electron jumping from the ground state to a lower energy state still produces a spectral line. His "orbitsphere" insanity still has to produce the spectral lines that we observe.
What this is analogous to is an instant acceleration of an electron from one velocity to another.
Spectral continuum come when electrons escape or join atoms, are accelerated, or when the spectral lines are so close together that they cannot be resolved.
markie is suggesting that Mills is even more deluded than his book and scam tells us! I may have missed Mills insanely denying the fact the hydrogen emits light at discrete energies
.
I suspect that this is markie being ignorant about Mills delusions. Mills should know that his fantasy will produce easily detected spectral lines. So Mills probably invokes some magic to hide them. My guess is it is the stupidity of his "catalysts" which in his imagination would carry away a part of the energy turning a line into a blurred peak. Add enough imaginary blur and there is no line or peak.
21 November 2018 markie: Delusion that an electronic transition between orbitals produces a"spectral continua".
We have an electron with a given energy in an orbital. The electron gains or loses energy and jumps to another orbital. That change in energy only depends in the difference in orbital energy. The electron emits or absorbs a photon with that energy. This gives a spectral line.
That applies even to Mills delusions. His delusion of an electron jumping from the ground state to a lower energy state still produces a spectral line. His "orbitsphere" insanity still has to produce the spectral lines that we observe.
What this is analogous to is an instant acceleration of an electron from one velocity to another.
Spectral continuum come when electrons escape or join atoms, are accelerated, or when the spectral lines are so close together that they cannot be resolved.
markie is suggesting that Mills is even more deluded than his book and scam tells us! I may have missed Mills insanely denying the fact the hydrogen emits light at discrete energies
.I suspect that this is markie being ignorant about Mills delusions. Mills should know that his fantasy will produce easily detected spectral lines. So Mills probably invokes some magic to hide them. My guess is it is the stupidity of his "catalysts" which in his imagination would carry away a part of the energy turning a line into a blurred peak. Add enough imaginary blur and there is no line or peak.
Doesn't seem to show dozens and dozens.
- Status