Cont: The Trump Presidency 11: Insert something funny

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tsukasa Buddha said:
Ivanka Trump sent hundreds of emails last year to White House aides, Cabinet officials and her assistants using a personal account, many of them in violation of federal records rules, according to people familiar with a White House examination of her correspondence.
White House ethics officials learned of Trump’s repeated use of personal email when reviewing emails gathered last fall by five Cabinet agencies to respond to a public records lawsuit. That review revealed that throughout much of 2017, she often discussed or relayed official White House business using a private email account with a domain that she shares with her husband, Jared Kushner.

The discovery alarmed some advisers to President Trump, who feared that his daughter’s practices bore similarities to the personal email use of Hillary Clinton, an issue he made a focus of his 2016 campaign. Trump attacked his Democratic challenger as untrustworthy and dubbed her “Crooked Hillary” for using a personal email account as secretary of state.

Linky.
Click to expand...

LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!

Will Daddy Trump start referring to her as 'Illegal Ivanka' now?

Irony at its finest.
 
Tsukasa Buddha said:
Linky.
Click to expand...

"But her e-mails!"
"Her? Ivanka's?"
"No, silly, Hillary's. Ivanka's hot and a Republican, she can do no wrong. An investigation into her email usage would just be a political ploy. I know I would use it as one if I were the Dems."

In other news... Trump administration discussed sharing Census responses with law enforcement for those that don't feel like a link directly to WaPo. Yeah... I think that the fact that Trump Administration wanted to use census data to identify illegal immigrants was pretty friggin' obvious, despite previous rulings against that being allowed because other concerns were much more significant. This is just further confirmation of the obvious.
 
Last edited:
dudalb said:
Just read about Trump's attack on Admiral MCRaven

As a veteran, all I can say is FU Donald.
Mcraven served for 37 years in the Navy, most of it as a Navy SEAL..one of the most dangerous branches of the Military. Trump ,despite his rhetoric,does not give a damn about the military except as a photo op.
Click to expand...

He also seems not to be getting the how all these agencies work together thing. Even if Mcraven knew about OBL's location before the CIA brought him in, he still would have to wait for a go ahead, so I'm not sure why Donny is blaming him for not going after OBL sooner.
 
On Monday, Trump again returned to the issue of bin Laden, claiming the intelligence community should have read his 2000 book, "The America We Deserve," in which he mentioned bin Laden and, separately, predicted a major terror attack.
Click to expand...

"Of course we should have captured Osama Bin Laden long before we did," Trump tweeted. "I pointed him out in my book just BEFORE the attack on the World Trade Center. President Clinton famously missed his shot. We paid Pakistan Billions of Dollars & they never told us he was living there. Fools!"
Click to expand...

Right, Donnie Boy, you predicted it all right. Here's what you actually wrote in that book "you" wrote:

One day we’re told that a shadowy figure with no fixed address named Osama bin-Laden is public enemy number one, and U.S. jetfighters lay waste to his camp in Afghanistan. He escapes back under some rock, and a few news cycles later it’s on to a new enemy and new crisis …
Click to expand...

That's it, you ******** liar. That's all the mention of Bin Laden in 'your' book.
 
Truth died in the culture wars, setting us free to run off at the mouth and say anything thst suits us.
 
In the ho-hum who didn't know that was coming category, the Secretary of Disinformation has announced that they have decided to reinstate Jim Acosta's press credentials...... but he better watch his ass! Supposedly the new rule to be put in place is "One Question. Follow-up only allowed if the podium so allows."

"Uh, Mr. Acosta, CNN."
"Mr. President, yesterday you made yet another unproven claim that was immediately disproven by three separate departments in your own administration. Do you actually have anything to support your claim that SODDI and mismanaged the press coverage of your yugely successful visit to France?
"Because I said so."
"But.... Mr. Pre-"
"Next question. Neener neener neener!"
 
"Our administration just doesn't seem arrogant enough, and we would really like to seem more cowardly."
 
Limiting questions to just one per reporter is clearly a method to limit the amount of verbal damage the Marmalade Shartcannon can do in one presser.

Of course, at the very next presser, as soon as a Fox or Breitbart reporter gets a follow-up or second question, the place will erupt.

Hilarity will ensue!
 
Foolmewunz said:
In the ho-hum who didn't know that was coming category, the Secretary of Disinformation has announced that they have decided to reinstate Jim Acosta's press credentials...... but he better watch his ass! Supposedly the new rule to be put in place is "One Question. Follow-up only allowed if the podium so allows."

"Uh, Mr. Acosta, CNN."
"Mr. President, yesterday you made yet another unproven claim that was immediately disproven by three separate departments in your own administration. Do you actually have anything to support your claim that SODDI and mismanaged the press coverage of your yugely successful visit to France?
"Because I said so."
"But.... Mr. Pre-"
"Next question. Neener neener neener!"
Click to expand...
When Trump can't play by the rules and win, he changes the rules so he does win. Pigeon, chess, tantrum, ******** on the board...
 
Norman Alexander said:
Limiting questions to just one per reporter is clearly a method to limit the amount of verbal damage the Marmalade Shartcannon can do in one presser.

Of course, at the very next presser, as soon as a Fox or Breitbart reporter gets a follow-up or second question, the place will erupt.

Hilarity will ensue!
Click to expand...

I doubt that conclusion given the rarity of trump having press conferences. These rules will apply to most Sanders briefings? It seems to me to mostly be rules to lay down the reasons they said they expelled him.
 
Tsukasa Buddha said:
...

I still don't know exactly what the angle is here, other than never letting a crisis go to waste for attacking his political enemies.
Click to expand...
Really? Trump is ecstatic to blame environmentalists and liberals. That was a given as soon as he opened his mouth about people stopping logging. (He used other words).
 
Stacyhs said:
Right, Donnie Boy, you predicted it all right. Here's what you actually wrote in that book "you" wrote:



That's it, you ******** liar. That's all the mention of Bin Laden in 'your' book.
Click to expand...
Wow. He has no clue we can see that stuff.
 
Foolmewunz said:
In the ho-hum who didn't know that was coming category, the Secretary of Disinformation has announced that they have decided to reinstate Jim Acosta's press credentials...... but he better watch his ass! Supposedly the new rule to be put in place is "One Question. Follow-up only allowed if the podium so allows."

"Uh, Mr. Acosta, CNN."
"Mr. President, yesterday you made yet another unproven claim that was immediately disproven by three separate departments in your own administration. Do you actually have anything to support your claim that SODDI and mismanaged the press coverage of your yugely successful visit to France?
"Because I said so."
"But.... Mr. Pre-"
"Next question. Neener neener neener!"
Click to expand...
Not dramatic and snitty enough. The gloves are off now that the midterms are over

Do you actually have anything to support your claim that SODDI and mismanaged the press coverage of your yugely successful visit to France?
"Because I said so." "That's an ******* question and you're an *******."
"But.... Mr. Pre-"
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
What a copout.

People expect funny, the TV audience will turn off.
Click to expand...

Well, Fox will cover it. I'm sure they can book the rollicking laughs of Jessie Watters and Norm MacDonald. (sic and sic - I don't know how either name is spelled)

They'll do ninety minutes of Trump-approved humor... making fun of all the people he's axed in his first two years. Unfortunately, it'll be like a memorial service and in ninety minutes all they'll have time for is to read the names.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Well, Fox will cover it. I'm sure they can book the rollicking laughs of Jessie Watters and Norm MacDonald. (sic and sic - I don't know how either name is spelled)

They'll do ninety minutes of Trump-approved humor... making fun of all the people he's axed in his first two years. Unfortunately, it'll be like a memorial service and in ninety minutes all they'll have time for is to read the names.
Click to expand...
I was going to say, ninety minutes won't be enough! Because there will be a couple more in the time it takes to read out the list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom