• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: The Trump Presidency X: 10-10 'til we do it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree. What I find utterly bizarre is how so many people are apparently incapable of picking up simple social cues. To me, it's obvious (in the freakish extreme) how utterly phony he is. The degree of phony, self righteous sanctimony is simply phenomenal. Yet people watch this sorry clown show and admire how "genuine" he is. It makes my brain want to hurl.

Several political commentators have tried to make sense out of how it is possible for someone who provably and objectively lies with the consistency, frequency, and vigor that Trump does is so often heralded as his supporters as "being honest" or "genuine" or "keeping it real."

The best explanation for this is that "being honest" and all those other ways of phrasing it are actually trying to say I think is what many of them are trying to say is something slightly but importantly different.

Listen to any mainstream politician talk. Do you ever within a rounding error hear a politician speak in a public setting that wasn't the most inhuman, inauthentic, sound-bite ready, pre-prepared statement ever? A politician can't say hello to a baby without you just hearing the dozen of focus groups it was run through, the edges sanded off by multiple speech writers, the tone and context sifted through again and again.

And when they are done and finally speaking it sounds good, it sounds right, it sounds correct, it sounds beautiful, hell it even sounds honest for certain meanings of honest. What it doesn't sound like is authentic. Human. Off-the-cuff. Unprepared. Unfiltered.

When you work that hard to make sure you saying something the "right way" it never feel natural.

And I do think on some level people have been desperate for this authenticity. Politicians, even the ones we like, have felt so fake and phony for so long that when someone came along with LITERALLY NO FILTER people did gravitate to him.
 
Several political commentators have tried to make sense out of how it is possible for someone who provably and objectively lies with the consistency, frequency, and vigor that Trump does is so often heralded as his supporters as "being honest" or "genuine" or "keeping it real."

The best explanation for this is that "being honest" and all those other ways of phrasing it are actually trying to say I think is what many of them are trying to say is something slightly but importantly different.

Listen to any mainstream politician talk. Do you ever within a rounding error hear a politician speak in a public setting that wasn't the most inhuman, inauthentic, sound-bite ready, pre-prepared statement ever? A politician can't say hello to a baby without you just hearing the dozen of focus groups it was run through, the edges sanded off by multiple speech writers, the tone and context sifted through again and again.

And when they are done and finally speaking it sounds good, it sounds right, it sounds correct, it sounds beautiful, hell it even sounds honest for certain meanings of honest. What it doesn't sound like is authentic. Human. Off-the-cuff. Unprepared. Unfiltered.

When you work that hard to make sure you saying something the "right way" it never feel natural.

And I do think on some level people have been desperate for this authenticity. Politicians, even the ones we like, have felt so fake and phony for so long that when someone came along with LITERALLY NO FILTER people did gravitate to him.


His dishonesty is earnest.
 
.....
Listen to any mainstream politician talk. Do you ever within a rounding error hear a politician speak in a public setting that wasn't the most inhuman, inauthentic, sound-bite ready, pre-prepared statement ever? A politician can't say hello to a baby without you just hearing the dozen of focus groups it was run through, the edges sanded off by multiple speech writers, the tone and context sifted through again and again.
.....

That certainly an exaggeration, but I get your point. But one of the factors behind the appeal of newcomers like Beto O'Rourke, Stacey Abrams, Andrew Gillum etc., and even old-timers like Bernie Sanders is that they do take specific positions and defend them vigorously. The difference between them and Trump is that they are rational, responsible public servants, not vicious, ignorant haters. Trump's appeal is to one segment of Americans, certainly not the majority.
 

Is the the one you're thinking of?

Nicholas Soames
They died with their face to the foe and that pathetic inadequate @realDonaldTrump couldn’t even defy the weather to pay his respects to The Fallen #hesnotfittorepresenthisgreatcountry


Then you'll have to forgive him! You already know that Trump can't handle complicated technology like umbrellas ...


ETA: Rincewind beat me to it.
 
Last edited:
I participated in a Veteran's Day fundraiser 5K for the VA this morning in 18° F weather. There were kids running in it.

Trump is a wimp.

Trudeau was there. It was on BBC news.
I didn't see any rain.
 
Several political commentators have tried to make sense out of how it is possible for someone who provably and objectively lies with the consistency, frequency, and vigor that Trump does is so often heralded as his supporters as "being honest" or "genuine" or "keeping it real."

The best explanation for this is that "being honest" and all those other ways of phrasing it are actually trying to say I think is what many of them are trying to say is something slightly but importantly different.

Listen to any mainstream politician talk. Do you ever within a rounding error hear a politician speak in a public setting that wasn't the most inhuman, inauthentic, sound-bite ready, pre-prepared statement ever? A politician can't say hello to a baby without you just hearing the dozen of focus groups it was run through, the edges sanded off by multiple speech writers, the tone and context sifted through again and again.

And when they are done and finally speaking it sounds good, it sounds right, it sounds correct, it sounds beautiful, hell it even sounds honest for certain meanings of honest. What it doesn't sound like is authentic. Human. Off-the-cuff. Unprepared. Unfiltered.

When you work that hard to make sure you saying something the "right way" it never feel natural.

And I do think on some level people have been desperate for this authenticity. Politicians, even the ones we like, have felt so fake and phony for so long that when someone came along with LITERALLY NO FILTER people did gravitate to him.
IOW, he is incaple of hiding his idiocy behind eloquence. Surprise, surprise.
Kind of a Bizarro-world Forrest Gump. A Forrest-Trump, if you will.
 
Last edited:
Theresa May, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and Justin Trudeau all paid respects, Trump's absence looks awkward.

EAT. oops looks like I am behind the curve on this :)
 
Justin Trudeau in August at the Dieppe Raid 75th Memorial

"It is an honour to be here with you at the National War Memorial and Tomb of the Unknown Soldier to mark the 75th anniversary of the raid on Dieppe... As we sit here in the rain, thinking how uncomfortable we must be these minutes as our suits get wet, and our hair gets wet, it’s all the more fitting that we remember on that day in Dieppe the rain wasn’t rain, it was bullets.”
 
Last edited:
Justin Trudeau

“As we sit here in the rain, thinking how uncomfortable we must be these minutes as our suits get wet, and our hair gets wet...it’s all the more fitting that we remember on that day in Dieppe the rain wasn’t rain, it was bullets.”

I still am not sure what the Dieppe raid was supposed to achieve.

Apart from inevitably giving the Germans early access to Churchill tanks - even if it went perfectly, the tanks wouldn't have made it back to the UK.

Although I do wonder if it did end up saving Allied lives in 1944 by helping persuade the Germans that the Channel ports would be targets. And convincing the Allies that that would be a bad idea.
 
Trump is now threatening to withhold disaster funding from California for the devastating fires there because of "Gross Mismanagment" ie; it's a Democratic State.
As a Californian I have to say it; F___ you, Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom