Qanon Conspiracy theories

[TurkeysGhost]

Regarding Qanon,

A coupla months back Q wrote a fair amount on how Sessions would go away after doing his part and how Trey Gowdy would replace him after Jan 1. Q referred to Gowdy's contentious dealings with Clintons & Co, and his history of being a tough prosecutor.

I will look for those Q posts for ya, as I know y'all crave and need more info.

Prophetic. Who else but Q could have known that Trump wanted Sessions gone?

 

[Bubba]

Thanks for the thread guidance. In that spirit:



I didn’t read it.

Good post !

 

[Bubba]

You're certain of this?

Another member at msm info level, I take it?

Nice town, Boston. All that higher education and history

Prophetic. Who else but Q could have known that Trump wanted Sessions gone?

 

[TurkeysGhost]

You're certain of this?

Another member at msm info level, I take it?

Nice town, Boston. All that higher education and history

Not sure what most of that means, but ok.

Trump has been loudly complaining about Sessions since he recused himself. Removal was a question of when, not if.

 

[carlitos]

Now this...

This one knows that 'media blackout' refers specifically to the major/mainstream media not covering the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time ie a decades long msm blackout on Bberg. Hence, this one now is seen playing word games. Why?

One way to ensure that folks know what you mean is to write, clearly and concisely, exactly what you mean. Unless you're just playing games, like this Q whatever is doing.

Various Characteristics Of Passive Aggressive Communication

Ambiguity is almost always part of the passive behavior or talk, because, by being ambiguous, the person can deny any kind of emotional upset. The message can usually be interpreted as benign, or indicating anger and hostility, and that's always the ambiguity.

 

[Bubba]

Not sure what most of that means, but ok.

It means your #361 sounds like a CNN etc info level outlook.

Trump has been loudly complaining about Sessions since he recused himself. Removal was a question of when, not if.

You assume Trump's histrionics about Sessions are sincere? Maybe his complaining about Sessions is not so sincere ie maybe it is part of a plan.

 

[Axxman300]

You assume Trump's histrionics about Sessions are sincere? Maybe his complaining about Sessions is not so sincere ie maybe it is part of a plan.

1. The leaks about Trump's displeasure of Sessions have been consistent for the past 18 months.

2. Trump has no plan.

 

[Whip]

Now this...

This one knows that 'media blackout' refers specifically to the major/mainstream media not covering the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time ie a decades long msm blackout on Bberg. Hence, this one now is seen playing word games. Why?

what is 'this one'? and why didn't you attribute the alleged quote to whoever wrote it?

 

[carlitos]

what is 'this one'? and why didn't you attribute the alleged quote to whoever wrote it?

See my quote above for an explanation. Intentionally vague speech is a feature of a certain kind of communication. The sort who might also admire some rando on the internet typing fake jargony-sounding telegrams on chan boards.

 

[Imhotep]

Where are the conspiracy theories?

 

[sts60]

See my quote above for an explanation. Intentionally vague speech is a feature of a certain kind of communication. The sort who might also admire some rando on the internet typing fake jargony-sounding telegrams on chan boards.

And the sort who like to play passive-aggressive games and avoid taking responsibility for their claims, second- and third-hand as they are. QED (not you, carlitos).

 

[Belz...]

Good post !

I think at this point the game is obvious.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

One way to ensure that folks know what you mean is to write, clearly and concisely, exactly what you mean. Unless you're just playing games, like this Q whatever is doing.

No, carlitos, constant backpedalling and shiftiness make you look good. Didn't you know that?

 

[Cosmic Yak]

I think at this point the game is obvious.

Indeed.

"Ha! I got a reaction!"

Yes. It's an internet forum. That's what it's for, and that's why we're here.
malbec fancied himself as a puppet-master as well, and just as credibly.

 

[sts60]

I don’t think it’s conviction-free trolling, like with the late unlamented Anders. I think Bubba really believes, or wants to believe, a lot of the drivel he reposts. It’s just that (a) he doesn’t really understand how to support his secondhand claims, (b) he runs through a very predictable passive-aggressive state machine in each conspiracy thread, and (c) his source material is just crap, so he doesn’t really have much to work with in the first place.

 

[Belz...]

Indeed.

"Ha! I got a reaction!"

Yes. It's an internet forum. That's what it's for, and that's why we're here.
malbec fancied himself as a puppet-master as well, and just as credibly.

Yeah there's no prize here. The whole point of discussions is to get attention.

 

[Bubba]

Fortunately for us, we can maintain our position and say its mere coincidence should events unfold according to Qanon's various predictions. Whew.

 

[Elagabalus]

from a Qanon board:

Where did POTUS campaign?<<SNIP>> This is going as planned. POTUS had a choice, help win the house, or guarantee what he needs, THE SENATE.

I can't help but notice that this is not a prediction at all and is simply after the fact made up drivel.

 

[carlitos]

Post-diction.

 

[Bubba]

I assume by all this that you are now admitting that there was no media blackout on Bilderberg, and that there have been journalists, writers and protest groups focusing on it for a significant amount of time.

Progress then...

No progress seen on your end....
As if you didnt know the issue is major media's blackout. Pretending 'media' (in context) means major media ie mainstream, is specifically dishonest. Your word game.

Major media avoided covering Bberg and the whistleblowing journalists, writers and protest groups until after Bberg got outed.


Do tell please, when did msm such as NY Times, CBS, BBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, Time, Magazine, Wash Post etc first inform their audiences of Bberg's decades of secret meetings? (not counting the 4 or or 5 fluffy gossipy items from 1950s-1960s.?

Oops, should I have said 'secretive' instead of secret? After all, some people knew about Bberg, right? No. Secret is the operative term here because the general public was not informed by msm until after Bberg got outed by whistleblowers ie 'alternative media' ie actual journalism. Stop pretending it is the same media.

As for your claim that the media isn't covering the meetings, a quick Google revealed articles from the following:
cnbc
The Daily Mail.
The Independent.
The Express.
Business Insider.
The Daily Telegraph.
The Guardian.
The Sun.
wikileaks
National Post.
Britannica.
The BBC.
The Daily Star,
Euro News.
The Catholic Herald.
And many, many more.

Not the most effective media blackout I've seen.



Estulin published his book in 2007.
The BBC ran an article in 2004.
Try again.

Fail.

The question you seem to be avoiding is *when did they begin covering Bberg?*

What year, (meaning after the 1960 fluffy stuff)?

You dont know, or do you....? Or is it you dont wanna know or admit?


This question, and its correct answer (date) proves msm did not report on Bbrg and whistleblowers until after Bberg was outed. (probably was after Bberg let msm know it was time to report, and how to report).

Pretending 'media' (in this context) means major media ie mainstream, is like lying.

Will you be splitting more hairs, or telling us when msm began reporting?