• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: The Trump Presidency X: 10-10 'til we do it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shalamar said:
Perhaps since the Democratic Party has the house, he thinks that all borders are now open?

That or his toddler-like attention span has moved onto something else.
Click to expand...

Or the whole "invasion" thing was just to rile up his base, and now that the election is over it's no longer needed.

He does constantly assume everyone else has the intelligence of a 3 year old and can't see through his deceptions.
 
Shalamar said:
Perhaps since the Democratic Party has the house, he thinks that all borders are now open?

That or his toddler-like attention span has moved onto something else.
Click to expand...

Or it was a great lie for the purpose of winning votes. The news cycle has moved on and it is buried.
 
This is America. Almost half of us think God created the universe thousand of years after the Mesopotamians learned how to brew beer, make glue, and create the first sex toys.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
They make the impeachment charges though I'm not sure that's the plan especially given we don't yet know what Mueller has.

They can subpoena people and charge contempt of Congress. I believe you can be jailed for that.
Click to expand...

Sure but they can only do that for things like refusal to answer questions or appear. They can't bring criminal charges.
 
Bob001 said:
Meet our new Acting Attorney General:

Whitaker is a perfect example of the change. A former U.S. attorney, he has spent the past few years as a far-right activist, starting an organization to hound Democrats with ethics complaints and oppose Democratic judicial nominees after an unsuccessful run for Senate in Iowa in 2014. That year, he ran to the right of the extremely conservative eventual victor Joni Ernst; in one debate, he was asked what his criteria for evaluating judicial nominees would be, and he said, “Are they people of faith? Do they have a biblical view of justice?”
Click to expand...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...oodletting-will-get-much-worse/?noredirect=on
Click to expand...

Are we to expect being stoned to death as punishment now?

What a putz. Leave it to Trump to make such a lousy and clearly self-benefiting choice.
 
We can forget about the Russian probe now that President Trump is running it, I bet somehow they will tag the blame to Hillary, or Obama. Yeah, according to The Hill, the acting attorney general is turning the investigation over to President Trump, which is in line with how rich folks do things. The can make the impeachment charge, but it wont stick with President Trump running both the FBI and the Supreme court. I suggest they try it anyway.
 
Last edited:
Trump repeatedly asserts Obama, not Putin, responsible for Russia's annexation of Crimea

Asked about a possible upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump referred to his July summit in Helsinki with the Russian leader.

"I had a very, very good meeting -- a very, very good meeting with President Putin, and a lot was discussed about security, about Syria, about Ukraine, about the fact that President Obama allowed a very large part of Ukraine to be taken," Trump said.

When the reporter pointed out that "was President Putin who annexed Crimea, sir," Trump insisted on his version of history.

"That was President Obama's regime. That was during President Obama. Right?" Trump said. "That was not during me. No, that was President Obama."

"But it was President Putin who did the annexation," the reporter said.

"No, no. It was President Obama that allowed it to happen," Trump said. "It had nothing to do with me."
Click to expand...
 
Hellbound said:
He does constantly assume everyone else has the intelligence of a 3 year old and can't see through his deceptions.
Click to expand...
Well, in the case of 46% of Americans (Trump's share of the popular vote) that is probably a valid assumption.
Click to expand...
Eh, I'd say 20% or so. The other ~26% just don't care, as long as it's anti-liberal.
Click to expand...
The people still decided to vote for him. Even if you're "Anti-liberal" you should recognize that picking someone as particularly unqualified as Trump would be bad for your political beliefs.
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh dear, are you deliberately rewriuting the very posts at issue to avoid trying to score an own goal? that is charming.

Read the actual posts, k?
Click to expand...

Ok, done....

...and I was right! The quote was specifically referencing Acosta's treatment.

And then you engaged in Whataboutism!

Now, are you going to provide any actual evidence that I rewrote anyone's posts?
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh man! Infowars and NBC are in cahoots?

That is some new folks!

Let us all thank skeptic ginger for bring the fact that the clip directly from NBC was edited!

Thanks SG!

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

FOREARM CHOP!!!
Click to expand...

So, lemme get this straight:

You think that if a third party (such as Infowars) takes NBC footage, alters it of their own accord with no[/i] input from NBC, that, somehow, establishes that Infowars and NBC are in cahoots???

Man, the desperate attempts to spin are mind-bogglingly asinine.
 
Segnosaur said:
The people still decided to vote for him. Even if you're "Anti-liberal" you should recognize that picking someone as particularly unqualified as Trump would be bad for your political beliefs.
Click to expand...

What most amazes me is the enthusiasm with which so many Trump supporters greet anything he does that can be considered "anti-liberal" no matter the dreadful effect it has on them, or the county as a whole. "Hey, did you see how Trump is going to nuke the entire USA?? Hah, hah, that's really going to show those liberals a thing or too!! Snort, chuckle, snort! I can't wait to see that!" We see a lot of that same sentiment expressed by several of our own Forum members, often just to get a rise from the liberal contingent here, although ultimately it still is, well, pretty silly.
 
Cabbage said:
So, lemme get this straight:

You think that if a third party (such as Infowars) takes NBC footage, alters it of their own accord with no[/i] input from NBC, that, somehow, establishes that Infowars and NBC are in cahoots???

Man, the desperate attempts to spin are mind-bogglingly asinine.
Click to expand...


Mmmmhhmmm, that right there is some fine, I mean FINE rule of so.

warms the belly!

Hi! Cabbage! I posted a link to the NBC news feed. the allegedly modified feed was from c-span.

Cottoning to the facts yet? In other words, the post that suggested I posted a link to the infowars feed was part and parcel of the series of monstrous lies from the leftists.

I get that you fell for it, don't feel bad, TBD is here to clean up those obfuscations.
 
The Big Dog said:
Mmmmhhmmm, that right there is some fine, I mean FINE rule of so.

warms the belly!

Hi! Cabbage! I posted a link to the NBC news feed. the allegedly modified feed was from c-span.

Cottoning to the facts yet? In other words, the post that suggested I posted a link to the infowars feed was part and parcel of the series of monstrous lies from the leftists.

I get that you fell for it, don't feel bad, TBD is here to clean up those obfuscations.
Click to expand...

How would I be expected to know that? Your links are never worth clicking on, therefore I never click them. Fact is, in jest or not, you posted speculation that NBC and Infowars are in cahoots.

I merely wanted to disabuse you of that asinine notion, in case it was serious.

I notice, however, you no longer defend yourself on the Whataboutism charge.

Good choice, Hypocrite.
 
Cabbage said:
How would I be expected to know that? Your links are never worth clicking on, therefore I never click them. Fact is, in jest or not, you posted speculation that NBC and Infowars are in cahoots.

I merely wanted to disabuse you of that asinine notion, in case it was serious.

I notice, however, you no longer defend yourself on the Whataboutism charge.

Good choice, Hypocrite.
Click to expand...

No, I did not post speculation, I was deliberately mocking a grossly improper suggestion that the link i posted was somehow doctored, which was utterly and unalterably false, albeit par for the course among the leftists. perhaps you will wish to revisit the subject with the individual who misled you?

As far as "defending' the whataboutism charge? I nuked that claim from orbit hours ago, and now you are essentially asking why the champion does not come to the hospital and "defend" the incoherent mumbling of the defeated challenger from deep inside his coma?

Hardly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom