Qanon Conspiracy theories

Horatius · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
We can know that trump is pointing to Q fans in rally seats, then drawing the letter Q in air with his finger, and then applauding toward them. Its on video.

Proving he is the most deluded of all, of course.

Well, A) Yes, he's pretty ******* deluded. He is an actual conspiracy theorist himself, after all. And, B) Big ******* surprise, he's exploiting CTs as another means to bamboozle his hordes of idiots. He did actually appear on Alex Jones' show, after all.

It's been almost two years. He's had control of both the Executive and Legislative branches for almost two years. So why has literally nothing happened yet? How long does a purge take?

carlitos · Nov 7, 2018

"Pointing and laughing" isn't the way I "express discomfort."

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

sts60 said:
Answer the question.

Try saying please, please. Try being a tad more polite. Not to mention logical.

Although seemingly one of the less compromised cognitively, you persist in attempting to frame it as if I am in charge of scheduling arrests of your beloved swamp critters.

Posted by sts60
So you get to drag out your fantasy forever? Or is there some definite time limit to which you will commit?

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Horatius said:
Well.....

(snip....boring opinions...)

.................".................

.................".................

It's been almost two years. He's had control of both the Executive and Legislative branches for almost two years. So why has literally nothing happened yet? How long does a purge take?

Good question ! Lotsa people ask him. He answered. Its in post 317

Lotsa firings there (maybe indicted?) does not resemble "...literally nothing happened yet..."

for yer convenience:

Qanon posted:

JayUtah · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
None of us including you can know for sure that Qanon is gibberish.

Speak for yourself. I've contracted for years for the Dept. of Energy, with appropriate clearances. I know what Q clearance is -- and more importantly what Q clearance is not. It is most certainly not the gibberish issuing forth under the QAnon banner. You have a history of not informing yourself appropriately on the subjects you discuss. That's as it may be, and perhaps as you like it. But you don't get to project onto others your limitations or negligence.

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Cosmic Yak said:
If there really was a "media blackout" (as opposed to, say, indifference), and the media is owned by friends of the Bilderbergers, how and why was this "blackout" ended?
Has this made any discernable difference to anything- either to us (the general public), or to the Bilderbergers?
As for the type that owns the media, your attempt to shift the burden of proof is noted and rejected. Hitchens' Razor, old bean. If you can't support your points, I see no need to consider them.

While its good to see you seem to be thinking, I cant help but notice your questions always require the most unpacking and spoonfeeding.

Please work on that.

example:

how and why was this "blackout" ended?

Outing by Estulin and others ended blackout. Explained earlier. Thrice. Or more.

Belz... · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
While its good to see you seem to be thinking (snip)

What's your excuse?

Halcyon Dayz · Nov 7, 2018

Bilderberg takes its name from the hotel in Holland

This one always annoys me to no end: Hotel de Bilderberg is in Gelderland, one of the Netherlands, not Holland.

carlitos · Nov 7, 2018

Halcyon Dayz said:
This one always annoys me to no end: Hotel de Bilderberg is in Gelderland, one of the Netherlands, not Holland.

Thank you for posting this. It led me to the most useful illustration of the Netherlands that I have found to date.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_the_Netherlands#/media/File:EulerDiagramEnglish.png

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Uh-oh.

Wigley's back.

Cosmic Yak · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
Outing by Estulin and others ended blackout. Explained earlier. Thrice. Or more.

Estulin published his book in 2007.
The BBC ran an article in 2004.
Try again.

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Cosmic Yak said:
Estulin published his book in 2007.
The BBC ran an article in 2004.
Try again.

there you go again

So you looked up estulin and thought you had a 'gotcha'. Whoopdeedoo for you !

As if his outing of them began when he published his book.

As if he was the only one. How many of the other early Bberg whistleblowers can you name?

There were groups protesting Bberg long before your beloved Bberg-friendly media began admitting Bberg existed.

Which real journalists/publications were interviewing Estulin and reporting on his work long before he published?

Did you find the earliest 'serious' Bberg article yet, not including the whisper gossip pieces from the early days....?

See what I mean about unpacking and spoonfeeding ? Its a tedious thankless job.

Why this deny/protect abusive parent position? A statist?

phiwum · Nov 7, 2018

Halcyon Dayz said:
This one always annoys me to no end: Hotel de Bilderberg is in Gelderland, one of the Netherlands, not Holland.

Oh, be fair. Americans use the two names interchangeably. Perhaps they shouldn't, but I often referred to my domicile as Holland rather than Gelderland or the Netherlands back when I lived there.

It's an innocent mistake.

sts60 · Nov 7, 2018

sts60 said:
So you get to drag out your fantasy forever? Or is there some definite time limit to which you will commit?

sts60 said:
Answer the question.

Bubba said:
Try saying please, please. Try being a tad more polite.

Evasion noted. I am not interested in lectures on manners from someone with your passive-aggressive posting style.

Why won’t you answer the question? Are you afraid to commit to a reality check?

Bubba said:
Not to mention logical.

Diversionary. What exactly is illogical about asking you to stipulate a timeframe for acknowledging you were wrong? Are you afraid to commit to a reality check?

Bubba said:
Although seemingly one of the less compromised cognitively, you persist in attempting to frame it as if I am in charge of scheduling arrests of your beloved swamp critters.

Nope. Passive-aggressive framing aside, you don’t get to project your cartoon view of the world onto me.

Quit stalling. Answer the question, or simply admit, by refusing to do so, that you intend to prolong your fantasy without limit, and that you will never acknowledge your error.

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

they love to say "gibberish" while nothing Qanon posts fits the definition.

As if Qanon's topics have much, if anything to do with atomic energy secrets.

Oh well, a chance to wave one's big wig around the room mustn't be wasted

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Quit stalling. Answer the question, or simply admit, by refusing to do so, that you intend to prolong your fantasy without limit, and that you will never acknowledge your error.

Fer gawdsakes Jets,

You're asking when I will admit I was wrong about believing (hoping, actually, as I've said I, like you, can not know for sure that Q is for real or not) there will be arrests, right?

As if you missed it....Its not my call, so I'll give trump all the time he needs, (there's the logic), while he's in office, to indict/arrest them, (and you, if you dont say please next time).

sts60 · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
None of us including you can know for sure that Qanon is gibberish.

JayUtah said:
Speak for yourself. I've contracted for years for the Dept. of Energy, with appropriate clearances. I know what Q clearance is -- and more importantly what Q clearance is not. It is most certainly not the gibberish issuing forth under the QAnon banner. You have a history of not informing yourself appropriately on the subjects you discuss. That's as it may be, and perhaps as you like it. But you don't get to project onto others your limitations or negligence.

Seconded, from direct experience. If the huckster posing as ‘Q’ really took his/their handle from that clearance, it was to bamboozle the suckers with a mysterious-sounding term of which they were ignorant. Seems to be a habit, but his determinedly ignorant followers keep lapping it up and regurgitating it.

sts60 · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
<blather snipped> so I'll give trump all the time he needs, while he's in office <more blather snipped>

So that’s your timeframe: while Trump is in office.

Why didn’t you just say so, rather than the dog-and-pony show? (That’s a rhetorical question; no need to answer.)

Well, you certainly gave yourself plenty of time to drag this out (unless Trump resigns, dies, or is removed from office before then). If you’re still on the board when Trump leaves office, I’ll remind you.

Belz... · Nov 7, 2018

Bubba said:
they love to say "gibberish" while nothing Qanon posts fits the definition.

There's no discernible meaning or logic. How would you call it?

Bubba · Nov 7, 2018

Is that a 2x4 or a 4x4 you got up there?...it must really hurt, because

sts60 said:
Evasion noted. I am not interested in lectures on manners from someone with your passive-aggressive posting style.

Why won’t you answer the question? Are you afraid to commit to a reality check?

Diversionary. What exactly is illogical about asking you to stipulate a timeframe for acknowledging you were wrong? Are you afraid to commit to a reality check?

Nope. Passive-aggressive framing aside, you don’t get to project your cartoon view of the world onto me.

Quit stalling. Answer the question, or simply admit, by refusing to do so, that you intend to prolong your fantasy without limit, and that you will never acknowledge your error.

Qanon Conspiracy theories

NWO Kitty Wrangler

"más divertido"

Banned

Banned

Penultimate Amazing

Banned

Fiend God

Critical Thinker

"más divertido"

Banned

Philosopher

Banned

Penultimate Amazing

Illuminator

Banned

Banned

Illuminator

Illuminator

Fiend God

Banned