Status
Not open for further replies.
Read a comment on Face (sadly usourced) that said Mueller was on jury duty in a different city when he was supposed to have been assaulting the nonexisting woman. Also the floor where the assault supposedly took plave houses not rooms but the hotel's gym.

I oughta make popcorn every time I check on this story. And I don't even like popcorn.

He was the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the investigation that put an innocent person behind bars for the Lockerbie bombing. Forum member Rolfe wrote a book about it. Mueller faked evidence in the case and he's the one who should be behind bars.
 
"The Special Counsel once again has abused his power. He ordered the FBI to investigate whether I paid a certain woman. The only problem is that this woman--Lorraine Parsons--doesn't exist. Mueller acted without doing the slightest bit of research. He has but one goal: deflect attention from him on to me. Well Bob, by week's end, our nation will know you as nothing but a sex offender."

-- Jack Burkman (Oct 30, 2018)

On the one hand, it's one more piece of nonsense from the right-wing. On the other, I have to admire the attempt to use the sex offender accusation on the right's enemies, just as they perceive, justifiably or not, that it's been done to them. Essentially what James Gunn got after Roseanne Barr's firing.
 
Last edited:
I know Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

Do you have a credible citation for that? I mean the last thing you were sure of was that a black poster was a white supremacist, so you'll forgive me if I don't take you at your word.
 
But let's set all that aside and assume that Jacob has been mainlining Mentats for a week straight and came up with a halfway sensible plan involving a modicum of misdirection. Why, then, would he have the scheme trace back to him in very obvious ways? Why would he make himself the one cheerleading the big story several days before it is exposed? Why would he put his own image (through an odd photoshop filter) on the Surefire Intelligence website? What about his own e-mail address? His mother's phone number? Why didn't it dawn on him that all of this is super illegal?

He's just an idiot. It's that simple.

It is by will alone I set my mind in motion?
 
Do you have a credible citation for that? I mean the last thing you were sure of was that a black poster was a white supremacist, so you'll forgive me if I don't take you at your word.

Ask Rolfe, she only wrote a book about it. She is widely considered an authority on the Lockerbie bombing. Mueller knew he was putting an innocent man behind bars.
 
"Their "managing partner" who "oversees all of the firm's operations globally" has a degree in Chemical Engineering from Harvard. Very interesting since Harvard doesn't have a chemical engineering department."


AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Jacob Wohl... the gift that keeps giving!!

I'm starting to like this guy. It's like a bad movie that turns hilarious in its badness.
 
Ask Rolfe, she only wrote a book about it. She is widely considered an authority on the Lockerbie bombing. Mueller knew he was putting an innocent man behind bars.

So you are citing a book that you haven't read as the evidence for your claim?

Good work.
 
This is interesting as it puts Rolf's book Adequately explained by Stupidty into the limelight https://www.amazon.com/Adequately-Explained-Stupidity-Morag-Kerr/dp/1783062509

Not sure if it's been brought up but Mueller was Assistant Attorney General in charge of the investigation of the Lockerbie bombing. I haven't looked too deeply into the Lockerbie investigation but I know Mueller was accused of faking evidence in order to convict an innocent person. I haven't read Rolfe's book so I don't know what her opinion is on Mueller but by all accounts, the man is a liar and a fraud and shouldn't be trusted.

He was accused and you don't know if the accusation is true but you think he shouldn't be trusted based on that? Gee, what does that remind me of?

I know Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

I'm not sure you're clear on what "know" means, given the above. If you haven't read the book and you don't know whether the accusation has any grounds, why do you think it's true?
 
Last edited:
I can't find the word Mueller anywhere in this article, please cite the relevant portion.

Sigh, at least try to follow along. I know you're relatively new to the forum. About ten years ago, Rolfe thoroughly proved Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was innocent of the Lockerie Bombing. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was put in prison in part by the fake evidence presented by Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller, who was in charge of the investigation.
 
Sigh, at least try to follow along. I know you're relatively new to the forum. About ten years ago, Rolfe thoroughly proved Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was innocent of the Lockerie Bombing. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was put in prison in part by the fake evidence presented by Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller, who was in charge of the investigation.
Specifics. What specifically did he, himself, fake or direct to be faked by a subordinate?

And don't just refer to the entire case discussion. I participated in and followed those threads. I looked into it as a refresher, and there was one single mention of Mueller - with regards to involvement by other countries such as Iran.
 
Ask Rolfe, she only wrote a book about it. She is widely considered an authority on the Lockerbie bombing. Mueller knew he was putting an innocent man behind bars.

I don't know what Rolfe's book says about Mueller. I haven't read it. You don't know what Rolfe's book says about Mueller. You've not read it either.

I'm asking you for a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

Perhaps you could link to the place where you got this information from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom