• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Lessons to be learned from the Kavanaugh Hearing

Here is a great example. If you were in this car, would you stop? Or would you advance? Leftist mobs are out of control. If the moderates on the left do not start speaking out against it, they're about to face it themselves.


Also, do you feel those assaulting the car are "protestors" or do they need to be arrested? (do you consider their actions legal?)

Oh, dear! You're really not very good at this, are you?

Do you realize that's another angle of the Lexus? Conveniently missing is the part where he drove forward with a protester hanging off the front of his car.

Conveniently missing from your discussions, so I'll ask again..... Are You Aware That Pedestrians in an Intersection in Portland Have the Right of Way?

Conveniently missing is the red herring defense that he has a right to protect his family, 'cuz there ain't no family there.

It's. The. Same. Guy. (Now you can pretend you knew that all along but I suspect you didn't. You were just looking for some graphic evidence to support your reprehensible statement that running down pedestrians is a proper thing to do. As I said, you can easily just retract the statement and get two Be A Man points. Or you can continue digging your hole.)

He decided he needed to turn and he wasn't going to take anything from the protesters so he turned INTO pedestrians walk straight across the crosswalk.


P.S. You might want to notice that the walk light is in favor of the pedestrians. :jaw-dropp Look closely. Your upstanding citizen, the one with the guy hanging off the hood of his car in the other video, is turning right into a bunch of pedestrians who have the light in their favor!!!
 
Those protestors should be arrested. It's okay to go up right to the point of breaking a law as long as you don't go over. The protestors clearly broke the law.

Look at BOTH videos. In the first one (which started this discussion) he can clearly be seen to be driving deliberately, albeit slowly, through the protesters. There's a guy hanging off the front of the car. HIS ACTIONS ARE ILLEGAL.

The second video that River posted is from another angle and you can't see the guy draped across the hood of the car. But you can clearly see the walk light in favor of the pedestrians.

Minor infraction for taking vigilante action, but they weren't out to "get him" in spite of the lying headlines and comments in the video River linked to. They were chasing him down to get pictures of him and if he was actually in fear why did he stop his car and get out? Seems to be idiots on both sides. They shouldn't have hit his car with whatever those sticks were. He shouldn't have driven his car illegally through pedestrians (in the guise of protesters).
 
Here is a great example. If you were in this car, would you stop? Or would you advance? Leftist mobs are out of control. If the moderates on the left do not start speaking out against it, they're about to face it themselves.

Also, do you feel those assaulting the car are "protestors" or do they need to be arrested? (do you consider their actions legal?)


"Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
-- Maxine Waters (June 23, 2018)

"My call to action, please get up in the face of some congress people."
-- Cory Booker (July 25, 2018)

"Michelle Obama always says, 'When they go low, we go high.' No. When they go low, we kick 'em. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.”
-- Eric Holder (Oct 7, 2018)

"You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again."
-- Hillary Clinton (Oct 9, 2018)

"The Second Amendment should now be self-explanatory to all citizens. Weasels like Holder are inciting the Democrat Mob and conservatives must defend themselves."
-- James Woods (Oct 10, 2018)

Concealed carry -- don't leave home without it.
 
Last edited:
"Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
-- Maxine Waters (June 23, 2018)

"My call to action, please get up in the face of some congress people."
-- Corey Booker (July 25, 2018)

"Michelle Obama always says, 'When they go low, we go high.' No. When they go low, we kick 'em. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.”
-- Eric Holder (Oct 7, 2018)

"You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again."
-- Hillary Clinton (Oct 9, 2018)

"The Second Amendment should now be self-explanatory to all citizens. Weasels like Holder are inciting the Democrat Mob and conservatives must defend themselves."
-- James Woods (Oct 10, 2018)

Concealed carry -- don't leave home without it.

You know it. Unlike some of the liberals here, I will defend myself and my family.
 
Look at BOTH videos. In the first one (which started this discussion) he can clearly be seen to be driving deliberately, albeit slowly, through the protesters. There's a guy hanging off the front of the car. HIS ACTIONS ARE ILLEGAL.

The second video that River posted is from another angle and you can't see the guy draped across the hood of the car. But you can clearly see the walk light in favor of the pedestrians.

Minor infraction for taking vigilante action, but they weren't out to "get him" in spite of the lying headlines and comments in the video River linked to. They were chasing him down to get pictures of him and if he was actually in fear why did he stop his car and get out? Seems to be idiots on both sides. They shouldn't have hit his car with whatever those sticks were. He shouldn't have driven his car illegally through pedestrians (in the guise of protesters).



Have fun being a victim. I refuse.
 
You know it. Unlike some of the liberals here, I will defend myself and my family.
Do you realize what you're signing onto here? S&A lists things that liberals have said that s/he views as physical threats, then concludes with the "conceal carry" nonsense, as if it's necessary to be armed to protect oneself from the liberal mobs.
 
Have fun being a victim. I refuse.

That makes no sense. You're portraying the perp in this instance as a victim and using cheap emotional tricks to garner sympathy for the noble citizen "defending his hearth and home".

What you mean, obviously, is no, you had no idea that you were showing another angle of the incident in question. You just went looking for some friendly rightwing sites showing justified attempted homicide, not realizing you'd already shot your load and missed on this same topic.

Carry on with your fantasy. Glad to know we can count on your "innocent" vote when they finally catch up with the guy who socked Richard Spencer. I mean, apparently disagreeing with someone is sufficient cause to cause them bodily harm in Riverworld.
 
Do you realize what you're signing onto here? S&A lists things that liberals have said that s/he views as physical threats, then concludes with the "conceal carry" nonsense, as if it's necessary to be armed to protect oneself from the liberal mobs.


Reporters telling people to not use the word "mob," intermixed with video of the angry "liberal mobs": [Here]
 
A simple look at FBI statistics will show you that right-wing violence outnumbers left-wing violence big a large margin.

for any left-wing act of domestic terrorism, I can give you three right-wing ones.

republicans are worried that democrats might start to catch up to them in terms of accepting violence as a legitimate power move.
 
Last edited:
A simple look at FBI statistics will show you that right-wing violence outnumbers left-wing violence big a large margin.

for any left-wing act of domestic terrorism, I can give you three right-wing ones.

republicans are worried that democrats might start to catch up to them.

I wasn't aware they checked for left-right leaning when arresting criminals.
 
Call me insensitive, but I don't care what happens to lefties who are intentionally blocking the road so they can bully, intimidate, and attack the people they stop. Stay on the sidewalk and mind your own business and you won't have to worry about being run down.
 
Call me insensitive, but I don't care what happens to lefties who are intentionally blocking the road so they can bully, intimidate, and attack the people they stop. Stay on the sidewalk and mind your own business and you won't have to worry about being run down.

Are you saying they deserved to be run down?
 
Are you saying they deserved to be run down?

I said I don't care what happens to liberal mobs blocking roads and trapping people in their cars. It is an aggressive act, and don't be surprised if it is met by an aggressive response, perhaps not at the Czar Nicholas level, though.
 
I said I don't care what happens to liberal mobs blocking roads and trapping people in their cars. It is an aggressive act, and don't be surprised if it is met by an aggressive response, perhaps not at the Czar Nicholas level, though.

It's still assault and you're still wrong if you run people over.

Also, do you have evidence that they attacked the driver?
 
Reporters telling people to not use the word "mob," intermixed with video of the angry "liberal mobs": [Here]
I have no idea what this means in the context of the discussion. Is this in some way a justification for a concealed gun in order to defend yourself from the "liberal mobs"?

paging Jabberwocky to the red courtesy phone
 
It's still assault and you're still wrong if you run people over.

Also, do you have evidence that they attacked the driver?

They bullied the driver and when you bully someone in a car, don't be surprised if they try to get away from you any way they can.

Years ago I moved back to Texas and had to take the written driver's test, even though I previously had a Texas driver's license and had an active license from another state. In any case, I missed one question on that test, which concerned a pedestrian in the middle of a street who wasn't at an intersection or in a walkway, and whether or not he had the right-of-way. I said yes, he had the right-of-way, and it was incorrect.
 
They bullied the driver and when you bully someone in a car, don't be surprised if they try to get away from you any way they can.

Years ago I moved back to Texas and had to take the written driver's test, even though I previously had a Texas driver's license and had an active license from another state. In any case, I missed one question on that test, which concerned a pedestrian in the middle of a street who wasn't at an intersection or in a walkway, and whether or not he had the right-of-way. I said yes, he had the right-of-way, and it was incorrect.

Was the video from Texas?

Were the pedestrians in the video near a corner?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom