Status
Not open for further replies.
No, the aim of it was to go searching for a crime with no evidence of one. Much like the guilty until proven innocent tactic taken with Kavanaugh. Pelosi makes a good description of what they tried first. It didn't work so this is plan B to get rid of Trump. (but it won't work, and those that broke the law are being exposed on both sides of the fence, so I'm cool with all of that) I'm looking forward to seeing these FISA documents declassified.
First, your claims in this post are absurd.

Second, you should take a good look at the book I just finished, Gaslighting America, Why We Love It When Trump Lies to Us; by Carpenter, Amanda B.
It explains in great detail how Trump gets you to believe his lies.

Carpenter is a Republican, BTW.
 
No, the aim of it was to go searching for a crime with no evidence of one.

No.

All of the lies told by people in the Trump administration regarding Russian contacts gave probable cause.

Don't ignore that just because you find it convenient.
 
No.

All of the lies told by people in the Trump administration regarding Russian contacts gave probable cause.

Don't ignore that just because you find it convenient.

You have evidence Trump committed a crime? Can we see it please?

Probable cause is a reasonable belief that a person has committed or will commit a crime. For probable cause to exist, a police officer must have sufficient knowledge of facts to warrant a belief that a suspect is committing a crime. The belief must be based on factual evidence, not just on suspicion
 
Last edited:
You have evidence Trump committed a crime? Can we see it please?

Did you not read what I just posted?

Lies imply the liar feels a need to hide something implies that something just might be a crime.

Hence: Probable Cause. The investigation is to determine if, in fact, a crime was committed. That's how investigations work.

Are you simply unaware of all the lies told by the Trump administration team regarding Russian contacts?
 
Did you not read what I just posted?

Lies imply the liar feels a need to hide something implies that something just might be a crime.

Hence: Probable Cause. The investigation is to determine if, in fact, a crime was committed. That's how investigations work.

Are you simply unaware of all the lies told by the Trump administration team regarding Russian contacts?

Here, I'll include the definition for you of probable cause in a legal sense so you can perhaps understand, this requires evidence. Not just suspicion....


Probable cause is a reasonable belief that a person has committed or will commit a crime. For probable cause to exist, a police officer must have sufficient knowledge of facts to warrant a belief that a suspect is committing a crime. The belief must be based on factual evidence, not just on suspicion

Do you wish to change the definition to something more suited to your purpose?

So again, where is this evidence?
 
Here, I'll include the definition for you of probable cause in a legal sense so you can perhaps understand, this requires evidence. Not just suspicion....




Do you wish to change the definition to something more suited to your purpose?

So again, where is this evidence?

Not really sure why you're having a hard time with this:

It's a fact they lied. Hence, probable cause.

QED
 
They didn't find evidence or corroborating witnesses because they weren't allowed to.

It's interesting that Trumpers hate the FBI when it comes to the Mueller investigation but think they FBI are fine people when they "investigate" Bart. I don't blame the FBI, they were hamstrung by Trump in Bart's investigation.
 
Who is they? And proof? Show the evidence you speak of.

For one thing, the people that met with Russians in Trump Tower, having previously lied and said no such meeting occurred.

Have you not heard of this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom