Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
I looked at some of it. Some pages contain lotsa of raw data so its a 'draw your own conclusions' thing on those.

Personally, I found the Players page helpful for following the he said she said news reports.


Players https://qmap.pub/players

Global themes https://qmap.pub/themes?pg=1

Network graph https://qmap.pub/analytics/network

Resignations https://qmap.pub/resignations

Executive orders https://qmap.pub/docs

Human trafficking https://qmap.pub/kids

Sealed indictments https://qmap.pub/indictments

Analytics https://qmap.pub/analytics

Site info https://qmap.pub/info
 
...and now reading the Global themes page, I see how combining it with the Players page helps to better connect some dots, for anyone interested in more study of the silly fantasies of those wacky kooky deluded Q followers. The more we know, the more we can ridicule them.

Players https://qmap.pub/players

Global themes https://qmap.pub/themes?pg=1
 
LSSBB said:
Funny, I googled around and saw other comments on parallels between QAnon and Church of the Subgenius. One thing that is missing is the whole weird pedophilia obsession of QAnon doesn't exist in Subgenius.

ETA: there is this, though.

http://subgenius.wikia.com/wiki/The_Big_Willy_Show
Click to expand...

LOL. So funny.

Who else back in the day heard of Church of the Subgenius, and the like, (Loompanics comes to mind)..? That stuff was wild.
 
Bubba said:
LOL. So funny.

Who else back in the day heard of Church of the Subgenius, and the like, (Loompanics comes to mind)..? That stuff was wild.
Click to expand...

I first heard of them in 1984, when I saw J.R. "Bob" Dobbs faces stenciled on columns on the Washington Ave. pedestrian bridge in Minneapolis. I asked a friend who seemed hip to all weirdness and he told me about Church of the Subgenius.
 
any scholars available to weigh in on this ?


Q says

- the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages now on the record are not a conspiracy theory.

- they will be indicted

- the Strzok/Page emails reveal a plot to frame potus

- corruption at highest levels of FBI and Justice Dept is being investigated.

- FBI counsel James Baker has flipped and is testifying.

- James Comey will be indicted.
Click to expand...
 
ooopsie, sorry, I forgot to include:

Q implied scholars should watch this brief video before weighing in on my recent post #169 (pasted below the video link, for your convenience)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOwr9PX05p4


Q says

- the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages now on the record are not a conspiracy theory.

- they will be indicted

- the Strzok/Page emails reveal a plot to frame potus

- corruption at highest levels of FBI and Justice Dept is being investigated.

- FBI counsel James Baker has flipped and is testifying.

- James Comey will be indicted.
Click to expand...
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Wild conjecture is pretty much your stock-in-trade. Do you have any evidence for this, and for its claimed significance, or is this just yet more drive-by bilgeburgers?
Click to expand...


Dont take my word for the 4,500% increase in sealed documents.

Dont take the anons word for it. They say this is where those wishing to debunk the 4,500% increase in sealed documents can find the raw data.

Public Access to Court Electronic Records

https://www.pacer.gov/



If there are indictments for Comey and Strzok etc, presumably they are in there somewhere.
 
Bubba said:
Dont take my word for the 4,500% increase in sealed documents.

Dont take the anons word for it. They say this is where those wishing to debunk the 4,500% increase in sealed documents can find the raw data.

Public Access to Court Electronic Records

https://www.pacer.gov/



If there are indictments for Comey and Strzok etc, presumably they are in there somewhere.
Click to expand...

Again, your claim, your burden of proof. If you think there's something in this conspiraspam you keep posting, say so, and back it up with evidence. If you seriously think I'm going to wade through thousands of court records trying to prove something I have neither belief nor interest in, you should think again.
I'm not taking your word for anything, btw. I'm waiting for you to post some evidence, and make some kind of point beyond "some people said stuff, do my homework for me and check it out".
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Again, your claim, your burden of proof. If you think there's something in this conspiraspam you keep posting, say so, and back it up with evidence. If you seriously think I'm going to wade through thousands of court records trying to prove something I have neither belief nor interest in, you should think again.
I'm not taking your word for anything, btw. I'm waiting for you to post some evidence, and make some kind of point beyond "some people said stuff, do my homework for me and check it out".
Click to expand...

Oh, thank you for taking the time to say that. I get all :boggled: trying to figure out where to even begin with such conspiraspam.
 
If there was/is the level of corruption and consequences the Q anons are touting, (and resignations, firings, sealed indictments etc) the whole Q thing makes sense, lending credence to "they never thought she would lose so they risked going too far over the line against Bernie and Trump".

If Q anons claims are true and if Hillary had won, there probably would be no investigation, no Grand Jury, no declassification etc

Those are very big 'ifs'. We cannot yet know that all of it is false. Time will tell.

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts ~ Bertrand Russell
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
If there was/is the level of corruption and consequences the Q anons are touting, (and resignations, firings, sealed indictments etc) the whole Q thing makes sense, lending credence to "they never thought she would lose so they risked going too far over the line against Bernie and Trump".

If Q anons claims are true and if Hillary had won, there probably would be no investigation, no Grand Jury, no declassification etc

Those are very big 'ifs'. We cannot yet know that all of it is false. Time will tell.
Click to expand...

What about Trump colluding with the Russkies? Why don't you investigate that one? Too main stream for you? What are you afraid of, Bubba?
 
Elagabalus said:
What about Trump colluding with the Russkies? Why don't you investigate that one? Too main stream for you? What are you afraid of, Bubba?
Click to expand...


I've seen everything I could find from both sides of that crucial issue.
Click to expand...


...ie you assume too much. Which is great to know. Thanks !
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom