• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

Which magistrate?

He means the defendant (who was previously a magistrate but had to resign after he was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated assault).

The way Baylor has written it makes it seem like it was the magistrate judging the case, but I'm sure that was a simple mistake on his part, and not in any way intended to confuse or deceive.
 
I'm still unclear as to how much time Baylor has spent in the UK and which parts of the country have been visited.
 
Contact chief inspector of constabulary Tom Winsor for further information. Just to warn you, he did say he didn't want to name the "won't go zones" due to UK's draconian "hate speech"/blasphemy laws.
Widespread public ridicule, more like.

ETA: I note the good Captain has clarified that Winsor didn't actually say that, anyway.
 
Last edited:
Had you actually looked at the data you'd see Muslims are extremely more likely to vote Labour while non-Muslims are not.

[imgw=640]https://i.imgur.com/FGIYii2.png[/imgw]

No, we didn't see the data, because you didn't post it. You claiming one thing and posting the wrong supporting data, is not a "win" for you.

In any case, Muslims make up less than 5% of the population, so they could all vote for the Monster Raving Looney Party, for all the difference it would make.
 
Last edited:
As I've said many times, apathy is a virtue in the UK. It's in British culture to put their head in the sand and pretend there is no problem, or simply "carry on," as they put it.

Abject ignorance of origin and meaning of reference duly noted.

When "skeptics" were confronted with a picture of British Police doing Jihadi hand gestures with a Muslim, the conditioning kicked in: deny, deny, deny.
That's on the level of saying people shouldn't shake hands anymore, because Hitler did that.

Also, the "racists" were right about grooming gangs.
Please show evidence of "racists" trying to highlight the issue before it was reported. They couldn't be "right," because they didn't know about them, either.

So it's not me who "has no interest in examining the truth." After reviewing the evidence, I believe Winsor over the tolerant, wordly, diversity-loving, Labour-voting "skeptics."
But only when you distort what he actually said to suit your agenda.
 
That's why I said "won't go zones." Effectively the same thing. They conceded territory to the immigrants.

Two brothers are having an argument. One of them punches the other in the face, breaking his jaw. Their father dries his injured son to the hospital, and they agree to say - if asked - that he fell and hit his head on a table. The police never get involved, and the family agree amongst themselves a suitable punishment for the brother who inflicted the injury.

By your logic, the police have, "conceded territory to the family."
 
I presume for the purpose of this thread, the 'no go zones' are defined as no go zones for the police. I can list plenty of no go zones for 12 year old girls, most of them having a kebab house on every corner, but for the police I offer you... traveller sites. Some of these are genuine police no go zones and I have heard many accounts of the police refusing to chase criminals onto sites, recover stolen property from sites or indeed enforce the law in any meaningful way. There was a story not long ago about someone being shot at from a traveller site, with a similar refusal to act by the police. A woman local to where I used to live had the contents of her farm repeatedly robbed by pikeys, who would turn up with axes and lump hammers and take what they wanted, and the police repeatedly refused to act. When she herself armed herself with a legally held shot gun and called the police, the police turned up... and arrested her.

Yeah, but they're not Muslims, so Baylor won't be interested.
 
Nice smear tactic. The video I linked to depicted video evidence without voice over narration or headlines telling you what to think. It's irrelevant if it a nutjob uploaded the video to his channel. Also, a lot of police shooting videos make it to nutty/conspiracy "police state" channels, so I suppose we should disregard them too.

None of the videos you have posted show what you - via the uploaders - claim they show.
 
As the US becomes "less white," whites are becoming more of a cohesive voting bloc. Blacks and Hispanics, who otherwise loathe each other, are aligning politically against the whites. Hillary Clinton ignored lily white Wisconsin and it cost her the election. Expect New England to turn from blue to red as whites become more disaffected, while Arizona and Georgia to turn red to blue as more and more mystery meat ethnics pile up in those states.

In time, you'll see the same effect in UK. Heck you're seeing it now as the graphs I linked to demonstrate.

You do know that the UK is 85% White? Your graphs don't show what you think they show, because they don't show the proportions of the different groups.
 
Brick Lane? According to Wikipedia “it is the heart of the city's Bangladeshi community”. ;)

Good call. Baylor is, of course, free to take a virtual walk down there on StreetView, in particular paying attention to the off licences at numbers 43 and 116, and the pubs at 60-62 and 149, which obviously can't exist in a "Muslim no-go area."
 
I do recall walking through Lewisham dressed as the Joker, drinking a bottle of Sol, accompanied by a man dressed as Jean Paul Gaultier and a somewhat unconvincing Uma Thurman. The discrepancy between actual and perceived distance travelled was considerable, although happily I did not encounter any hostile party (or Batman).
 

Back
Top Bottom