Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

[aleCcowaN]

Originally Posted by Nay_Sayer
Every thread is, disagreeing and demonstrating his numerous errors = hate speech. You gotta get yourself that new websters Cambridge edition: 'Victim mentality dictionary'.

Bwhahahah! Oh man, we needed that humor break.

Nay sayer? Hi, you do know that I have not been claiming that it is hate speech, rather it has been the atheist snowflakes that have been making that preposterous and beyond hypocritical claim.

I guess the atheists have been studying the “victim mentality dictionary.”

Outstanding!

Better wait until the meaning of his post decants in your mind. Then come again ,

 

[The Big Dog]

One can understand the logic behind a horror without agreeing with that logic.

Well in this case you are affirmatively defending it, so...

I hope there are a few skeptics who are embarrassed with these apologetics on behalf of China’s abusive regime as I am.

“Maybe the Chinese apologists should try reading books rather than explaining the “logic” behind burning them.”

-Indiana Jones

 

[The Big Dog]

Better wait until the meaning of his post decants in your mind. Then come again ,

Decant, yeah, our correspondent does not realize that you are the one playing victim with your ludicrous hate speech claims.

Although, I do find this part of the discussion hilarious!

 

[Nay_Sayer]

Better wait until the meaning of his post decants in your mind. Then come again ,

He seems quite upset. Ask him if he needs a calming tea.

 

[Mycroft]

Exactly; in the same way that that "National Socialist" party in the late '30s and into the '40s was anything but "socialist."

It's like you're discovering for the first time that names of things sometimes do not describe what the entities in question actually do.

Except I think they really though of themselves as Marxist, and you're engaging in a common fallacy.

https://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/no-true-scotsman/

 

[aleCcowaN]

He seems quite upset. Ask him if he needs a calming tea.

I'd rather offer him a large glass of communion wine. That'll do the trick.

 

[The Big Dog]

He seems quite upset. Ask him if he needs a calming tea.

Hee hee! You are asking the person who is calling my posts “hate speech” if he thinks I need calming tea?

Dream thread

 

[aleCcowaN]

Hee hee! You are asking the person who is calling my posts “hate speech” if he thinks I need calming tea?

Dream thread

Are you asking him if he thinks that you think that I think that you are a master in verbal pancakes flipping?

 

[The Norseman]

Except I think they really though of themselves as Marxist, and you're engaging in a common fallacy.

https://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/no-true-scotsman/

No, I'm really not. There are actually true Marxists out there. China is not that. That's pretty much all there is to it.

And don't forget that we're not talking about China fifty years ago, or a hundred or even ten really. We're talking about 21st century China and it is not Marxist in its actions.

 

[sylvan8798]

Golly, except for the fact your understanding is not correct,

Sure, Jan

 

[The Big Dog]

Sure, Jan

Oh, well if it is your understanding, I will certainly get right in with Jesus and tell him to forget all that render unto Caesar stuff.

Interestingly, you cut out the part of my post where I pointed out you were making making excuses to justify human rights abuses. Oh, not interesting, I meant obviously and cowardly.

Bye, Felicia

 

[sylvan8798]

Oh, well if it is your understanding, I will certainly get right in with Jesus and tell him to forget all that render unto Caesar stuff.

Seriously? Render under to Caesar stuff? That's what you've got? Good Lord. Have you read the book? Are you following AT ALL?

 

[The Big Dog]

Seriously? Render under to Caesar stuff? That's what you've got? Good Lord. Have you read the book? Are you following AT ALL?

Read the Book? Absolutely, in between apologizing for human rights abuses, do us a solid and quote the “book” where it says that Christians should create a theocracy.

“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. ...”

Start deleting here

(It is actually more work to cut out the part of my post where I pointed out that you are actively making excuses for human rights abuses, which is hilarious)

Stop deleting here.

Did you here that the atheist got killed at the Chinese re-education camp for Muslims? Yeah, she fell out of the guard tower.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

Read the Book? Absolutely, in between apologizing for human rights abuses, do us a solid and quote the “book” where it says that Christians should create a theocracy.

“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. ...”

Start deleting here

(It is actually more work to cut out the part of my post where I pointed out that you are actively making excuses for human rights abuses, which is hilarious)

Stop deleting here.

Did you here that the atheist got killed at the Chinese re-education camp for Muslims? Yeah, she fell out of the guard tower.

k.

 

[sylvan8798]

Read the Book? Absolutely, in between apologizing for human rights abuses, do us a solid and quote the “book” where it says that Christians should create a theocracy.

“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. ...”

Speechless. Just speechless. Do you read this stuff, or just vomit it up?

 

[The Big Dog]

Speechless. Just speechless. Do you read this stuff, or just vomit it up?

Hey folks, I bet ya a nickel that our poster is going to support her claim, any minute.

And a dollar that if our poster replies, she will cut out the part where I mention that our poster is actively and aggressively defending brutal human rights abuses.

 

[sylvan8798]

Hey folks, I bet ya a nickel that our poster is going to support her claim, any minute.

And a dollar that if our poster replies, she will cut out the part where I mention that our poster is actively and aggressively defending brutal human rights abuses.

Which claim was that? That Christians want to establish a theocracy? You are quoting the wrong bible passages and you know that damn well. But that's the beauty of the bible, isn't it? That you can support ANY ****** THING?

BTW, I have little sympathy for evil B vs evil A. And by little I mean the limit as delta x approaches zero.

 

[The Big Dog]

Which claim was that? That Christians want to establish a theocracy? You are quoting the wrong bible passages and you know that damn well. But that's the beauty of the bible, isn't it? That you can support ANY ****** THING?

BTW, I have little sympathy for evil B vs evil A. And by little I mean the limit as delta x approaches zero.

Actual human rights abuses and putting 1 million Muslims in re-education camps: “little sympathy.”

And there it is folks.

 

[arthwollipot]

Dream thread

Is this you admitting that your only purpose is to stir up outrage, and that you consider this thread to be an ideal execution of that plan?

 

[Dabop]

Which claim was that? That Christians want to establish a theocracy? You are quoting the wrong bible passages and you know that damn well. But that's the beauty of the bible, isn't it? That you can support ANY ****** THING?

BTW, I have little sympathy for evil B vs evil A. And by little I mean the limit as delta x approaches zero.

Actual human rights abuses and putting 1 million Muslims in re-education camps: “little sympathy.”

And there it is folks.

And there it is folks
TBD supports evil- as long as its his side doing the evil...